Specimen Preparation Gallery & Portfolio; All specimens salvaged, collected, and prepared with required federal and state permits in accordance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act
If you're interested in learning more about specimen prep or work at a wildlife education facility that wants to use specimens, here is a copy of my write-up on the benefits and considerations (including permitting, storage, and data) when starting to prepare a collection as well as a prep guide for creating avian round-skins, spread wings, and skeletal specimens. It is still a work in progress.
Spread Wings & Dead Things Educating with Avian Specimens Kit Ellsworth | CPBT-KA, IATCB Abstract — When using animal ambassadors in
we do submissions now?
Check out my two coolest preps from this last year, Laysan duck and ocellated turkey! Both were given to my museum from the wild from USFWS and were necropsy birds (already all chopped up) but they came out pretty cool!
Sure! Why not! I'm really enjoying seeing them
For now, I'll probably just post them as bonus content but if I get enough maybe I'll make a schedule.
They look great! And with necropsied birds too, really nice!!! I adore Turkeys, but I've only done a Wild Turkey (top of my list to track down those photos as he's one of my favorite preps). The wing is gorgeous! Definitely one of those species where it's a shame you can't see the back while pinned, would love to see those tail feathers.
And I wasn't familiar with Laysan Ducks; I love the mottling!
I DID IT! I found some of my first prep photos. I am so excited! I'd really like this blog to be a pretty much complete gallery of my preps, and it's so nice to look back on my early preps and see how fare I've come too. Though honestly the early ones aren't as terrible as I feared, but I took a great class with a lot of phenomenal TAs who made sure we didn't botch any birds too badly.
It's hard for me to know for certain because I didn't keep the best records and both my first wing/skeleton prep and my first wing/skin were Ring-billed Gulls, but I'm pretty sure that the wing yesterday was from my very first bird and this is my second bird which was my first skin.
Tuesday was my last prep day at the museum until sometime in September! So possible hiatus warning… possibly not!
I will be away for an internship related to my other interest: LIVE birds. Gasp!
I’m hoping to have a chance to go through my backlog of photos to find early prep photos and post more of those that I haven’t gotten to before, but I’m not sure exactly how quickly I’ll get to that with travel and new internship work.
I do have plenty of mammal photos I’m excited to share, so Mammal Mondays will continue! Honestly, possibly multiple mammal days a week… currently undetermined.
At the very latest, dead birds will return with the beginning of the fall quarter! And I’ll be presenting a poster at the AZA conference!!! So there may be some updates about that.
Black-tailed jackrabbits are locally endangered in Washington state so this lady was part of a telemetry program that tracks the population. The tag in her ear has her ID number #57 and tracked her location.
When she died they were able to use her location to find her body, so we know that she was predated by something (likely by a coyote based on the compound fracture on her hind leg and the puncture marks on her neck and haunches). Her body was cached for later where it was retrieved by the department of wildlife for necropsy. I feel a little bad that the predator lost their kill, but I’m glad I got to prepare her.
Tuesday was my last prep day at the museum until sometime in September! So possible hiatus warning… possibly not!
I will be away for an internship related to my other interest: LIVE birds. Gasp!
I’m hoping to have a chance to go through my backlog of photos to find early prep photos and post more of those that I haven’t gotten to before, but I’m not sure exactly how quickly I’ll get to that with travel and new internship work.
I do have plenty of mammal photos I’m excited to share, so Mammal Mondays will continue! Honestly, possibly multiple mammal days a week… currently undetermined.
At the very latest, dead birds will return with the beginning of the fall quarter! And I’ll be presenting a poster at the AZA conference!!! So there may be some updates about that.
Long answer and photos: below the cut (cw: bunny butts and genitalia?)
Subtitle: I’m going to fight the University of Edinburgh & A prize to anyone who sends me photos of a pika’s genital area
Thank you to @vasinvivian for bringing this up
After a recent mammal Monday, I was informed that pikas have a single psuedocloacal opening for reproduction and waste compared, which is very unique. Most other mammals that typically have at least two (urogenital for reproduction and urine, and an anus for feces). I was also asked whether this trait is shared by hares. This seems like it should have been a reasonably easy answer to determine (what did early naturalists like better than cutting up an animal and describing it???) but proved surprisingly challenging actually, with a lot of misinformation out there (looking at you the University of Edinburgh…). So please enjoy this overly long explanation with too many digs at the University of Edinburgh!
Alt text:
Screenshot from University of Edinburgh page on Lagomorphs with a list of “special adaptations to help obtain nutrients from a diet comprising large quantities of grasses.” The last bullet point is the relevant highlighted text “lagomorphs have only one opening – the cloaca – for both the anus and the urnio genital tract.”
First to make sure we’re all on the same page, what is a pika? What do they have to do with Hares?
Pikas are a small alpine lagomorph. Lagomorphs are the order of mammals that contain pikas, rabbits, and hares. None of these animals are rodents, though lagomorphs are closely related to rodents and together lagomorphs and rodents form the grandorder: Glires.
Alt text.
Diagram of a taxonomic tree showing three orders of mammals: Scandentia (treeshrews), Lagomorpha (rabbits, hares, pikas), and Rodentia (rodents). Also shows that Lagomorpha and Rodentia are sister taxa forming the grandorder: Glires.
Many probably learned the basic taxonomic levels in biology:
Kingdom (ex. Animalia)
Phylum (ex. Chordates or things with a notochord/precursor to spinal cords but basically vertebrates plus a few other things)
Class (ex. mammalia or mammals)
Order (ex. Lagomorpha)
Family (ex. Leporidae or rabbits and hares)
Genus (ex. Lepus or “true hares”)
Species (ex. L. californicus or Black-tailed jackrabbit)
But there are lots of extra levels like infraclasses, grandorders, and mirorders as scientists determine the more nuanced relationships between species (though classifications often bounce around and scientists argue about what goes where so make sure your taxonomy sources are up to date... yes... I typically use Wikipedia... sue me, but recommend birds of the world for bird species).
Second, what’s a cloaca and why is that interesting in a mammal?
Many vertebrates have one opening that serves for reproductive, digestive, and urinary tracts called a cloaca. This opening is called a cloaca and all amphibians, reptiles, birds, and cartilaginous fish have one. Notably most mammals do not have one, except for a few basal mammals (like monotremes: platypus and echidnas). So, it is at the very least wacky and fun that pikas have one (sort of…).
It’s important to note that they don’t have a true cloaca. There’s one external hole but this quickly divides into the urogenital opening (reproductive and urinary tracts) and anus (digestive tract) a couple millimeters inside the opening; so instead of a true cloaca this is typically referred to as a psuedocloacal opening in articles (except for the University of Edinburgh apparently…sorry, the University of Edinburgh has deeply disappointed me).
Description from the Mammalian Species Pages on the American Pika (Ochotona princeps)
Alt. Text
Males do not possess a scrotum or a baculum; females do not possess a vulva (Duke, 1951). In both sexes, the rectal canal and urogenital canal are separated by a septum terminating 2 or 3 mm from the single "pseudocloacal" oepning, which must be everted to expose the penis (long and pointed) or the clitoris (broad, with a shallow groove; Duke, 1951; Krear, 1965). Females have three... (next line cut off)
So, what about leporids (rabbits & hares)???
Well, domestic/European rabbits are very well documented to have two openings (urogenital and anus), but despite this there are a few websites out there that report that ALL lagomorphs have cloacas (see above... and a final FIGHT ME University of Edinburgh). This cannot be true since we know domestic rabbits do not, but what about other rabbits and what about hares?
Alt text
Image of urogenital opening and anus of a domestic rabbit from Medirabbit labels added by myself. The urogenital opening & expressed penis, anus, and two anal glands on either side are labeled with red arrows and text.
Well it was difficult to find sources that directly said that leporids in general DO NOT have pseudocloacal openings. However, I did find sources that didn’t mention that they did directly after stating that pikas did, like this article on lagomorphs as a model species. So I would assume that the lack of indication that leporids have one, implies to me that they DO NOT HAVE ONE.
Description from "Lagomorpha as a Model Morphological System"
Alt text.
[Text in image starts with irrelevant citation] Rabbits and hares have a short tail and lack or have minimal sexual dimorphism (e.g., Chapman and Ceballos, 1990; Fa and Bell, 1990; though see Orr, 1940 on sexual dimorphism in Sylvilagus); pikas lack an external tail and both sexes have a cloaca-like structure and lack sexual dimorphism (Graham, 2015). Most leporid males have testes located in a scrotum in front of the penis and females possess two to five pairs of mammary glands. Embryonically, the mammary glands develop from the mammary line (ridge), as is typical... (line is cut off)
But… we can also look at some dead animals!
That's what you're here for right?
So, I did a second Black-tailed Jackrabbit (which is a species of hare... because common names are stupid) this week and can confirm that she had two openings (a urogenital opening and an anus, not a psuedocloacal opening. Here’s a photo of the female jackrabbit’s multiple openings.
Alt text
Image of urogenital opening and anus of a female Black-tailed Jackrabbit. The urogenital opening, anus, and two anal glands on either side are labeled with red arrows and text.
Here’s a comparison image of the urogenital and anus openings on a male pygmy rabbit (Sylvilagus idahoensis, same genus as Cottontails).
Alt text
Image of urogenital opening and anus of a male Pygmy Rabbit. The urogenital opening, anus, and two anal glands on either side are labeled with red arrows and text.
Can we be sure that all leporids (rabbits & hares) don’t have a psuedocloacal opening?
(Warning: some speculation)
Well no… but we can probably assume that they don’t because parsimony (I am not a taxonomist and this is based on my understanding of what makes the most sense from college biodiversity courses and discussions with my mother the mink mammalogist). Parsimony is the concept that we can logically decide how species are related to each other by looking at the number of differences between groups, “the optimal tree will minimize the amount of homoplasy (i.e., convergent evolution, parallel evolution, and evolutionary reversals)” (Wikipedia). So in other words while these things happen (octopuses and vertebrates convergently evolved camera eyes; and many birds lost flight and reptiles lost limbs independently of each other), if there’s no convincing reason that two groups evolved something independently of each other, it’s probably best to assume they share a common ancestor that had this trait.
In this situation, the common ancestor of pikas (ochotonids) and rabbits/hares (leporids) had openings similar to rabbits/hares or maybe more similar to rodents, but pikas independently developed a pseudocloacal opening (this might be related to them being alpine and wanting to minimize heat loss?) while leporids didn’t. It would be less parsimonious to assume that the common lagomorph ancestor developed a psuedocloacal opening and then leporids (or some leporids) re-evolved two openings. So I would assume that all leporids have two openings until someone demonstrates otherwise (let me know if you dissect some cool bunnies!).
Side note: how different are rabbits and hares?
I also want to point out that while we say lagomorphs are pikas, rabbits, and hares, these are not three equally distinct groups. Pikas are their own family but hares are just part of the family leporids with rabbits. All leporids used to be classified in the genus Lepus with today’s “true hares” but rabbits have been split up more as biologists have better understood the nuanced relationships between different species. Today there are about 70-80 species of leporid across 11 genera: 1 genus is Lepus or hares, the other 10 genera are all considered “rabbits.” But these are not two distinct groups!!! Hares are nested in the middle of the leporid tree.
Alt text.
Taxonomic tree of Lagomorphs from Wikipedia. Added by myself are a box around the members of the family leporids, showing the distinction between them and pikas. Also added highlighting the hare genus Lepus to show how it's in the middle of the family rather than sister to all "rabbits."
So even though there’s a lot of sites out there that talk about the differences between “rabbits” and “hares” and treat them like too distinct groups, most of these sites are comparing between hares and well-studied rabbit species like Cottontails in the United States and European Rabbits (Why do you think this is? I'm guessing something to do with colonialism and the domination of western voices in science... but that's kind of outside of the scope of this post), so there’s a lot of REALLY different rabbits out there that are more poorly studied. Look at these cuties!
Alt text.
Four "rabbit" species [clockwise from top left] Volcano Rabbit (Romerolagus diazi), Sumatran Striped Rabbit (Nesolagus netscheri), Jameson’s Red Rock Hare (Pronolagus randensis, and not actually a true hare), and Amani Rabbit (Pentalagus furnessi)
So, I’d be willing to bet that a lot of these species have very different adaptations to better understood “rabbits.” Maybe I’ll go on a side quest to become a leporid expert… but anyways, this is just to point out that hares aren’t THAT special and distinct! They are special and cool but it would be very strange if they somehow had psuedocloacal openings and other leporids didn’t because to the best of our knowledge, they are smack dab in the middle of leporids.
CLOSING THOUGHT: If anyone works at a museum and can send me a picture of a pika’s psuedocloacal opening, I will be very grateful!!!
One of the data points we take during prep is skull ossification. Baby birds start out with a thin single layer skull and as they age they develop a thicker two layers skull. Most orders of birds have a fully ossified skull when they fledge from the nest but passerines take a bit longer, so it can give us a lot of information about how old a bird is.
This Fox Sparrow died by hitting a window in December, and from the outside appeared identical to an adult bird, but because of the presence of a bursa near the cloaca and this partially ossified skull, I know it was a first year bird.
Incredibly, banders can determine skull ossification on a live bird by looking through the thin skin. I'm not entirely sure how they pull that off, because I typically have to remove the brain and look through the skull in the light to feel confident that I'm actually looking at a partially ossified skull. I do so many non-passerines that I don't get enough practice.
In the first photo, I circled the window section that appears transparent compared to the rest of the skull. I also included a diagram of the skull ossification process under the break.
It’s always a lot harder to get mammals to look quite right because their entire skull is removed, but she’s got some shape to her so I consider that a win! Not just a tube lol.
A few more photos after putting a stitch between the ears and using some mesh to hold them in place and flat
Left to right: Rock Dove/Pigeon, Cedar Waxwing, Violet Green Swallow
The two pale ovals in each of these photos are the bird’s male gonads, tucked along the back wall of the internal organs right above the kidneys. Bird testes change size depending on breeding condition so they aren't always obvious, which is why it's taken me so long to share a photo, but now I’ve got a small collection of photos from breeding birds. The violet green swallow particularly was in great breeding condition…
The testes aren’t always the same size (I believe some species can lose one sort of like the fact that most female birds only have one ovary). Thus Brown Creeper had two very different sized testes.
