I wrote an article responding to all the most common anti-Heard arguments, showing the same arguments can be used against Depp.
I wrote an article responding to common Anti-Heard arguments, showing that the same arguments can actually be used against Depp and sometimes don't apply to Amber at all. Here are each of the arguments I respond to:
A. Amber Heard has admitted to initiating violence. B. Amber Heard has admitted to violence, even if she did not admit to initiating it. C. There are witnesses of Heard being violent. D. Amber Heard does not deny being violent when accused of it in recordings. E. Amber Heard has a history of domestic violence. F. Amber Heard shamed Depp for walking away from arguments, which is a form of abuse. G. Amber Heard’s story has been inconsistent. H. If Amber Heard was being physically abused, why didn’t she document it and/or take more pictures? I. Amber Heard’s photographs are edited. J. Why doesn’t Amber Heard have medical reports? K. Amber Heard had more power in the relationship. L. A victim of domestic violence wouldn’t disparage and taunt their abuser to their face if they were afraid of them. M. A victim of domestic abuse wouldn’t be constantly angry and destructive while their abuser is calm. N. A victim of domestic violence would not be smirking in court and not taking it seriously. O. A victim of domestic violence would not pull a defecation prank on their abuser. P. A victim of domestic violence would never give their abuser a knife.
I would appreciate any feedback, any things I missed, glaring mistakes, etc. Thank you!
The most common arguments being used to discredit Amber Heard actually discredit Johnny Depp