formerly Insane-Clown-Yaoi!!!!! changed it because i like this more
untitled
d e v o n
The Bowery Presents
almost home
taylor price

Andulka
Not today Justin
Misplaced Lens Cap

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

PR's Tumblrdome
NASA
Noah Kahan
Cosimo Galluzzi

titsay
Cosmic Funnies
todays bird
Keni

#extradirty

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
official daine visual archive
seen from Thailand

seen from T1
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Germany
seen from Poland

seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Kazakhstan
seen from France
seen from India

seen from United States

seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from Puerto Rico

seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
@disgusting-fucking-jester
formerly Insane-Clown-Yaoi!!!!! changed it because i like this more
I was skimming my copy of Gender Outlaws: TNG to find a different essay and got reminded of Julia Serano's contribution and the way it unabashedly opens with the same misconstrued hatred of Judith Butler's work (of course without naming Butler) and how much she hates the way nonbinary people talk about gender as a social construct while real transsexuals struggle and how actually nonbinary cissexuals are soooooo privileged compared to real transsexuals because nonbinary people are like white people who say they don't see race.
Everytime a contemporary binary trans person goes on and on about how nonbinary people have a "queerer than thou" attitude I blame Serano. Genuinely. With all of the theory and essays I've read she always seems to be the main source of this distrust and dislike of people who express genderfuckery and obviously socially ostracized nonbinary queerness by binary trans people. She's one of the biggest modern perpetuators of exorsexism in transfeminism of the last 2 decades and it makes me ill.
reblog if you like girls and/or pasta
by the way it's fine to like sexual content just for the sake of it. "we can't ban porn because other stuff will get banned" "sometimes nude art has value" "the government will classify queer people as sexual" this is all true but it's okay to just like porn. its okay to not want porn to be banned because you like it.
Big and huge fat yucky gagobingus
1855
1868
1874
1943
1934
i get praise for drawing fat bodies and I realized the bar is in hell drawing fat bodies that are also desirable and personalized to the person with the body.
I often see people make fat characters but it's always big boobs chubby belly (which is a valid body type) but at the same time we gotta start drawing characters with double chins and fat rolls and knee creases, etc. I recently got better at drawing fat distribution and it's been a pleasure watching it grow in my art.
transmisogyny isn't 'girl transphobia' but also transmascs can't use that term ever. transfems are hypervisible but also transmascs are the 'default' trans. transmascs are lazy whining children but they're also running every lgbtq+ society on earth. society is systematically transphobic but also sees trans men as men and gives them male privilege. people afab can fall back on their agab for privilege but people amab never can.
funny how my posts abt transphobia/homophobia etc get some traction but the second i post abt racism nada nothing
in my little pony universe youd go to a job interview and theyd be like so how does your cutiemark reflect your dedication to this position. And every time youd have to spew some bullshit about how your cutiemark of two tennis rackets actually means youre a team player and good at multitasking and view the market like a playing field. or whatever. and you wouldnt even get the job
Thanks to Equestria v Sugar Sprinkle, cutie mark interview questions are considered hiring discrimination, so if anypony asks you any cutiemark related questions or even alludes to any questions about your cutiemark such as "In your own words, describe your life purpose" you can and should refuse to answer. Know your rights, ponies.
i feel the need to reiterate this
the study that concluded trans women on average make less than trans men only took into account full-time jobs, meaning it ignored data from trans people in part time jobs. trans men are more than *twice* as likely as trans women to have part-time jobs, which basically by definition pay less than full-time jobs. from this study (sample size 27,000+ usamerican transgender people) which does include part-time jobs, trans men [in the united states on average] make about 30% less than trans women, which is a PRETTY BIG NUMBER to fuck up on a reporting decision don'tcha think
you know i dont think it counts as actual discourse when one side is going "all trans people are oppressed in sometimes unique sometimes overlapping ways and we all can have complicated relationships to gender and privilege and lack thereof" and the other side is making up a bunch of bullshit that was never said in the first place because theyre obsessed with finding the next marginalized group they can prop themselves up on to deal with the crushing reality we live in
"trans men are both men and targets of misogyny."
"so youre misgendering yourself and clinging to your agab."
"no, trans men are most often treated like broken women and are percieved and enforced by society as such."
"see? transandrobros love talking about how much trans women are male socialized with male privilege, so they can be innocent little babies with glass bones and paper skin"
"no, trans women at any stage of transition are also othered and treated as broken, no trans person has access to-"
"so youre misgendering yourself and clinging to your agab against the big scary trans women"
like this is not discourse. this is a carousel. it is a self-sustaining feedback loop for people who wish desperately to feed their own persecution complexes. no matter how many disclaimers or written out essays or olive branches offered. this crowd does not care about transgender liberation, only to use their own oppression as an excuse to take everyone else down with them.
imagine if we said lesbians are privileged because society rewards attraction to women. That's true, isn't it? It's catered to and expected, while attraction to men is looked down upon. Attraction to men can make you be seen as a threat (for men) while attraction to women gets attempts to convert you at worst.
That'd be ridiculous, right?