i personally like to take this as john code for “stop being so attractive”
art blog(derogatory)
Not today Justin

oozey mess

#extradirty

★

PR's Tumblrdome
Stranger Things

JBB: An Artblog!

Andulka
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Misplaced Lens Cap
Acquired Stardust
DEAR READER
One Nice Bug Per Day
dirt enthusiast
YOU ARE THE REASON
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
i don't do bad sauce passes

izzy's playlists!
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
seen from Türkiye
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye
seen from Germany
seen from South Africa

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from Philippines

seen from Türkiye

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Sweden

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from United States
@distortedpineapple-blog
i personally like to take this as john code for “stop being so attractive”
This makes me inexplicably happy.
I smiled uncontrollably when it started playing, omg this needs to be everywhere on tumblr.
everyone who reblogs this, and i mean everyone, will get a song in their ask, that i think matches their blog and personality.
every single one.
You better be telling the truth.
YESTERDAY THIS GIRL WORE HEELIES TO SCHOOL AND SHE WAS HEELYING WITH HER LUNCH AND SHE FELL AND HER FACE LANDED IN MASH POTATOES AND WHEN SHE LEFT THE LUNCH ROOM SHE HEELIED OFF THE STEPS AND FELL AND NOW HEELIES ARE BANNED AT OUR SCHOOL
I WASN’T KIDDING
Superwhoavengepotterlock - All Violin [x]
hear the music of my people
EARGASM
—* TOLD YOU THERE WAS SUPERWHOAVENGERPOTTERLOCK.
BLESS THIS POST WITH ALL THE TUMBLR BLESSINGS THAT THERE ARE
Just imagine this motherfucker being the one playing it
…brb changing underwear
10knotes:
M&Ms Droplets
now that’s what photography should be about… not a black and white picture of someone’s shoes
The top picture is full of M&M’s. They’re bule, red, orange, green, yellow, and brown.
But in the bottom picture we clearly see there’s white, pink, and even purple candies in the bowl.
The bottom picture is of gumballs! This concludes that the bottom picture is not taken with that camera at all. I’d even go as far to say that it was edited in photoshop with a filter!
Yes the above image and the below image are not the same photograph being taken. This is rather obvious.
BUT Mr. Wright there is one thing you overlooked. Examine the droplets on the bottom image. None of them are from the same angle. This is a natural occurance when looking through water droplets.
Is it not possible that the photographer took the second image first?
Would it not be more probable that when asked HOW it was taken he/she took the above image of their setup Using M&Ms, something much more common in a household rather than many gumballs, something they may have just bought for the original photo?
So to claim it was not taken with the same camera is indeed a long shot Mr. Wright.
Thank you for your time.
Really Edgeworth, is that you’re argument.
Aren’t you overlooking the fact that there are no pink M&Ms. This proves undeniably that these are not, in fact M&Ms, but some other kind of candy.
And one other thing, I find it highly improbable that not one piece of candy is facing so the M logo is on the candy.
So in conclusion, there is no way these are possibly M&Ms.
hey mister I think you’re confuuuuuuused. Edgeworth agreed that they weren’t M&M’s. He was just refuting that there is a possibility there wasnt any photoshop used and that the above image was only depicting the method used in the bottom image.
I think someone might be getting a little senile hehehe
Everyone seems to be walking around the accusations by examining whether they are or aren’t M&Ms. That is not what’s important. What we should be looking at is instead, the so-called droplets, compared to the background image.
The angles within the droplets do not realistically coincide with one another! As well, I don’t spend much time staring at drops of water, but I can surely say I’ve never seen such clarity in any water droplet. Also, as in the former picture, there is an obvious fogging on the glass, surely caused by whichever process was used to spray the water. Where is the fog?
On top of all that, the drops are amazingly tiny compared to the anonymous-candy. One could argue the sheet is further away than in the ‘example’ pic, but the blurring of the candies definitely objects to that. We could also try to assume that the spray method used in the ‘original’ photo caused much tinier water spots, but are we to believe that the photographer was so careless that they couldn’t recreate the correct droplet size in the ‘example’? Surely, they should have been able to cause at least a closer resemblance.
Sure seems like they went out of their way to showcase the methodology of how the photograph was taken, yet neglected to go far enough to ensure it could be a like-comparison?
Rather unlikely!
Actually, Mr. Godot!!
Well, according to the properties of light and the way it’s refracted…
If you mirror it the right way, they line up just fine!
Hold on there, pups. You’re all going in completely different directions. Shih-na, if you will?
Lang Zi says: “The truth lies not at the exit, but rather, shines outside the maze itself.”
You need to see past the boundaries given to you in order to figure out the actual purpose and, as much as I’d hate to admit, both Mr. Prosecutor and the crow-girl have some pretty tame ground under their feet with those assumptions.
As said before, it’s logical to assume the photographer is merely depicting the method used in order to get the results shown in the second photo—and it can be just that.
But what if it’s something else entirely?
We’re all wolves who’ve been swindled by the coyote that has stolen our kill. How do we know if the photographer just isn’t using some clever ploy to get us all confused? He could have taken these pictures separately and simply put them together with getting us riled up in mind.
I think we all need to reconsider our options, here.
Casually brings it back.
My lovely followers, please follow this blog immediately!
Most in-character thing I’ve seen so far.
I just made the ugliest snort ever. Because it COULD happen like this.
Please let this happen.
Time to reblog this again…
It’s back
Fun fact: Cheetahs only attack pray that runs
jesus that is good to know.
Yup, that’s the point you just stay still and let it do whatever the fuck it wants that doesn’t involved you getting eaten.
REALLY FUN FACT for big cats cheetahs are fucking docile as shit
my grandfather ran a cheetah sanctuary in south africa and hed just lie with them and sleep among them and theyd rub against him and chirp at him theyre big fucking babies
my mom was like “nicole clean your room” so im like “ugh im going to kill myself” and she like stared at me and shes like “honey its okay you dont have to clean right now” and she came upstairs with tea and two cookies and kissed me on the cheek
i said that but my mom said “make sure you clean your room first”
There are two kinds of people in this world
can you imagine if tumblr just decided to shut down and you see all these confused teenagers coming out of their house squinting at the sun
moonspots:
TO TRASUR PLANET U SAY?!?!?!?!?
you are a jerk if you point out someone’s pimples
Unless they’re your best friend. Then its just funny.
no its never funny. it’s super rude and embarrassing and your friend could already be upset and self conscious about it so dont make it worse for them
WHY ARENT THERE ADULT-SIZED PLAYGROUNDS
LIKE EVERYTHING IS THE SAME AS A KIDS PLAYGROUND
BUT BIGGER
WHY DO WE NOT HAVE THOSE
theme parks. just. theme parks.
but u have to pay for theme parks
that’s the adult part
son of a bitch
ladies and gentlemen, behold
the St. Louis City Museum:
Playground for adults and children.
They even serve alcohol.
THE best place on the fucking planet!!
I am borderline crying at how sassy this person is
ROLL BACK THE ATTITUDE