Week 4 Prompt 3
Prompt 3 (extended): At Teufelsberg this week you will see a huge amount of graffiti. It's a cultural phenomenon here - highly skilled artists have been allowed to paint the walls of this defunct spy station. Some murals have lasted years, while others are painted over from one week to the next. As Ledingham tells us, “Public relations is best defined and practiced as the active attempt to restore and maintain a sense of community.” How is this graffiti a function of community building/maintenance? How might this space be different in the U.S.? Would the owners of this property or the federal government be likely to allow this long-term graffiti haven to continue untouched by anyone who isn't part of the community? Post a selection of murals to illustrate your post.
Teufelsberg is located on the ruble of what used to be Berlin. It started out as a spy post during the cold war, and later people tried to develop the land into high-end flats. This plan did not work and now there today there are old buildings covered in graffiti and a whole network of artists who come there to paint. The community that currently occupies that land has a contract with the owner to keep up with the land and essentially prevent squatters from overtaking the area. In return the owner allows for artists to come there and paint their work. This contract between the owner and artists creates a community as Ledingham talked about in his article. The artists look out for each other and promote each other’s work. Our tour guide told us we couldn’t take pictures of any artists working because of the legal ramifications. They even maintain the property so that they can work and people can tour there. This trust between the owner and artists, and between the artists gives the artists a sense of community.
The artist’s experience a sense of community, but I do not believe a space like this would be possible in the United States. The government in the United States would not allow for artists to work on old government buildings, however, I do believe our government would allow for a similar arrangement in different circumstances. I think they would allow for an owner of a property to promote art in this manner, but I don’t believe they would allow this to happen on former government grounds. If this were allowed, I believe we would see art from a different viewpoint. In Teufelsberg, a lot of the art was anti American and anti war. I think in America you would see a different form of art that is not as anti American.
The owners of Teufelsberg clearly have a unique agreement with the workers to allow for this to continue, but as our guide mentioned, graffiti is outlawed everywhere else. Our guide also talked about the reasoning behind the contract with the owner was to maintain the land as well keep up with some form of security. In return the owner allows for the workers to continue their artwork. I think the owners will continue to allow this agreement to continue as long as the property is not sold. Outside of the property though the government has placed restrictions on what the artists can and cannot do. Overall I believe the community put in place will allow for this artist’s haven to continue in the long run, but only to those a part of this community.









