Crystal City

☀🌩 Court Jester, Trve Stacy, Radfem M*nhater, Sexual Sadist, Businesswoman, Virgin, Whore, Sorceress, Lizard Person, Archon, Femgineer, Ayahuasca Ceremony Priestess, Loosh Farmer ☀🌩 now permanently banned from reddit!! female solidarity is the only thing that matters ;3

[liberate-women-now]

Backwards answer.

[duckingretard]

It's sickening how the patriarchy has literally denied so many women the opportunity to experience normal human sexuality. Women deserve to enjoy sex beyond self voyeurism and performance. Free us from the shackles of autosexuality and arousal by proxy.

[duckingretard]

...🍷

[duckingretard]

which way modern woman?

[duckingretard]

"Men should be glad feminists was equality and not rev-" shut up, speak for yourself.

[swissjeez]

“Why does everyone think transwomen are predators????”

[duckingretard]

it's bleak

[duckingretard]

Having unfiltered access to men's thoughts online is ironically what's making young women fearful about having children btw.

Originally posted to r/natalism:

There are many posts here about how women's internet access/access to social media is one of the main things driving declining birthrates even in developing countries. I do believe this is true, however there seems to be confusion from men on exactly *what* online content is pushing women away from having children/partnering up with men (bc declining birth rates are directly correlated with declining marriage rates). Hint: it's not feminist content.

Most young women have grown up with complete unfiltered access to men's opinions on us. Most men who claim to be "pro-natalist" or "pro-family" online also openly use this to justify for female subjugation (or outright rape), this isn't a misrepresentation, this is a reality, I've personally witnessed this even on this sub. I don't think men realize that associating pregnancy (a natural biological process that is apolitical) with "traditional" right-wing patriarchal values is exactly the reason why women are rejecting it. A lot of young women I know personally do like children but don't want to have any because the risks are just so abundant. They fear losing their freedom or sense of identity, finding out a male partner holds misogynistic views, is abusive, cheats, etc, and not being able to leave, becoming a single mom, your husband no longer finding you attractive after you "hit the wall" or give birth, having a daughter just for her to be victimized by men later on, these are real fears women have, and rightly so, they've been taught BY men to not trust men.

Any woman who is young enough to have grown up with the internet has undoubtedly been exposed to a TON of violently misogynistic rhetoric from men online, viewpoints they wouldn't necessarily have been privy to in earlier generations. In 2025 the topic of family formation is unfortunately mostly presented online in the form of birth rate/great replacement hysteria from redpill/incel types. Women ARE seeing this content even if they don't engage with it, we also have the experiences and advice of older women in our families who went down the "traditional" route and were punished immensely for it. These things are constantly shaping our views on men whether you think this as unreasonable/unfair or not. I found the above post on tumblr with hundreds of likes from young women. Women have access to male spaces, we are witnessing firsthand men's opinions on women and motherhood, and we don't like what we see, it really is that simple. Women don't feel safe to form partnerships/have children with men because of the way men present themselves.

You can choose to be offended by this or deny it but I'm simply telling it like it is (as someone 19f who previously identified as anti-natalist/4b). The underlying beliefs of women in these communities are not incorrect or irrational, they are *constantly* reinforced by men. The only thing that has changed about my worldview between then and now (as someone who went from not wanting children to wanting a lot), is that I feel somewhat confident I'll be able to avoid the negative outcomes, many women are not this hopeful.

[duckingretard]

[duckingretard]

Just got banned from r/RadicalFeminism!!🥳🍾 The mod/(owner?) made a comment claiming it was bc of my "ai overview" which is already retarded, it would've taken about 25 seconds on my profile to see this is inaccurate, but the reason they gave me for the ban was "being a terf," which I also gave no indication of. Then I click on her profile to see the owner is an ACTIVE sex worker/dominatrix. I strongly dislike fetishists/sex workers co-opting this movement to attract male clients/create engagement. Truly the jokes write themselves atp.

[duckingretard]

[duckingretard]

Being "trans exclusionary" should just be the default belief of any radical feminist, feminism is a female liberation movement... for females. I dislike the term "terf" because it centers TIMs and brings trans "issues" to the forefront of thought in any individual who hears it, issues which are ultimately just not that important.

[duckingretard]

*cough cough* FGSJ

[duckingretard]

[duckingretard]

[drbased]

the concept of the whore is so comically absurd. like the primary, if only, trait of the whore is that she's forever hungry, she consumes. but what does she consume? not food, bc that's an actual resource. does she take up space? no, of course not, because men are supposed to be bigger and stronger than her. does she talk a lot? hell no. so what does she actually consume, what does she take? well she takes cock. consumes cum. does she have a desire to orgasm, to enjoy herself sexually? well, not even that, really. literally just cock, which like, isn't a resource to be consumed, it's just a body part. and sperm? sperm is literally what the man was going to excrete anyway. it's fascinating that men transfer their bottomless void of consumption onto women, but they can't conceptualise her having a hunger that exists outside of their own desires.

and pondering this lead me down a pattern of thought: men, in sex, literally give themselves to the woman. in putting your penis inside a woman, a physical body part of yours disappears from view. when ejaculating, you lose something your body has created. and if you ejaculate into a woman's vagina and that act becomes the catalyst for her building a baby inside of her, part of you has become absorbed and used by the woman. and all of this without her needing to ask, often with her explicitly not wanting it. men are transparently afraid of their own sexuality, and I think the existential terror of losing part of himself to her - mentally and emotionally in the form of sexual desire, then compounded by the physical reality - provides the framework of the conceptualisation of the whore. he feels a primal urge to give, and hates himself for that, so he assumes that she must need to take.

[duckingretard]

Male attempts to be "sexually dominant" have always come across as tacky and awkward to me, there's just a fundamental insecurity present that makes it unbelievable. This is why their attempts to flip our biological reality with cultural narrative (by describing sex as a violent act where women give and men take) are so over the top and corny. Sexual sadism, kink, rape, porn, purity culture, these are all desperate attempts to cope with the inherent fear men feel towards women, and by extension towards sensuality.

[duckingretard]

Man caught burying his face into a couch where a little girl was previously sitting.

Paraphilic behaviors need to be eliminated from the gene pool.