How important is representation in [Franchaela's] love story?
RMH

@theartofmadeline
will byers stan first human second

shark vs the universe

No title available

No title available
Not today Justin

tannertan36

No title available

JBB: An Artblog!

Discoholic 🪩
ojovivo
almost home
hello vonnie

PR's Tumblrdome

⁂
dirt enthusiast
noise dept.
Game of Thrones Daily

#extradirty
seen from Germany

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Spain

seen from United States
seen from Hong Kong SAR China

seen from Türkiye
seen from Singapore

seen from Italy
seen from Türkiye

seen from Türkiye

seen from Türkiye

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Greece
seen from United Kingdom
@dykechaela
How important is representation in [Franchaela's] love story?
i think more men should die for the sake of lesbiansm actually
Somewhere in Mayfair…
franchaela in bridgerton s03 → s04 → s05
Bridgerton Season 5 ― 10 Burning Questions About the New Love Story (x)
"We're coming to this as very different characters. So, Francesca's not aware of what queerness even is, whereas Michaela is very familiar. Very familiar."
HANNAH DODD & MASALI BADUZA on BEING THE FIRST QUEER BRIDGERTON LEADS | A CONVERSATION WITH YOUR NEW BRIDGERTON SEASON FIVE LEADS (full interview)
H: We’re excited because we’re the first queer love story taking centre stage, but they’re both really interesting characters..."
M: I hope that fans, especially in the queer community, feel seen and heard and represented. And I hope that they feel celebrated because I think that every love-story is beautiful."
HANNAH DODD & MASALI BADUZA on BEING EXCITED TO TELL A QUEER STORY, THEIR CHARACTER'S QUEERNESS & WHAT THEY HOPE FANS TAKE FROM SEASON 5 | (full interview)
M: “I think Michaela like [the book guy] is very charming, you know, has a great mask up and she keeps people at bay with this pretense...
H: A lot of what we've done so far isn't in the books, so we've had quite a lot of license to play around...
HANNAH DODD & MASALI BADUZA on ADAPTING THEIR CHARACTERS FOR TELEVISION | A CONVERSATION WITH YOUR NEW BRIDGERTON SEASON FIVE LEADS (full interview)
MASALI BADUZA interviewed by Zainab Jiwa (x)
Fully taking into consideration Black women's concern over Michaela's writing (and the Bridgerton staff’s broader passivity when it comes to protecting their dark-skinned characters from racism and harassment), the backlash to Francesca being a lesbian in love with a dark-skinned Black woman, and the resistance to Eloise rejecting marriage are all symptoms of the same underlying problem. That being, that a fantasy concocted for straight white women cannot even contemplate Black women (especially if they’re lesbians) and celibate women.
“Eloise has a love interest in the book, so she cannot be queer, aroace, or celibate.”
The books themselves are a hot pile of garbage, filled to the brim with misogyny. The show has already changed countless elements, from characters’ races to major plotlines. It was their deliberate choice to emphasize Eloise’s desire for freedom outside of a marriage she does not want. f your modern-day perspective cannot comprehend why a woman in the Regency era might want to be recognized as a person in her own right, then you have no right to call yourself a feminist. In fact, that position is anti-woman.
Freedom of choice in a patriarchal society is a myth. Someone who had a choice, on the other hand, were the writers. They purposefully chose to write Eloise as a woman opposed to marriage. If they bring in the right man to make her change her mind, that's misogyny. Embellished with pink ribbons and a man who respects her is still misogyny. Just like them casting Black actors and South-Asian actors and East-Asian actors does not negate the racism they are still subjected to (by the press, by the fandom, and by the writing itself).
every tongue that raises against michaela stirling/franchaela shall fall
People are going to try to gaslight Michaela/Franchaela fans into thinking that the disproportionate hatred towards the character and the ship have nothing to do with lesbophobia or misogynoir and, if you're going to engage (ignoring and blocking them is perfectly valid and understandable), shut that shit down without entertaining any of their arguments.
Do not accept a single excuse. There is no legitimate reason for hating this character or the ship. None whatsoever.
BOOK V TV SHOW ADAPTATION #1
as someone who did read the book because i like to know my enemy for context, many so called fans aka the vile homophobes and racists who think they’re the only ones in the world entitled to seeing themselves portrayed onscreen, are either greatly exaggerating or straight up lying about certain aspects of the plot in order to justify their bigotry. especially when they whine about the show not ‘staying true’ to john presence, the dynamic between francesca & the male michaela, and fran’s so called infertility journey.
LIE 1# 'they diminished john on the show in order to 'push michaela/ a gay 'agenda'. WILDLY UNTRUE. (but even if so, who gives a fuck lol)
john is ONLY in chapter one of the book. which opens with male cousin's (MC) pov. john, fran, and MC are discussing fran and john’s anniversary and fran asks MC for ideas. he, being in love with her, isn't all that enthused. they move on to fran telling MC he should find a wife but MC and john ask her to stop and that he’ll find one when he’s ready. then MC and fran decide to go on a walk because john is unavailable. john then mentions a headache, goes upstairs and dies. these are the majority of his lines.
CH 2: mostly focuses on fan and MC’s flirty conversation during the walk. when they get back to the house, they discover that john is dead and the rest of the chapter is fran and MC processing that.
from the beginning, which opens on MC brooding about his love for fran and how he can't have her, it's obvious that the book is way more invested in establishing the flirty back and forth between MC and fran rather than depicting any so called passionate lovestory between fran and john. because the actually love story is between FRAN AND MC. (i get get reading comprehension that an all-time low, but this is crazy the author literally spoon feeds it to you 😭)
so the claims that john has this incredibly rich personality and backstory is a lie and a lazy one. he’s little more than a plot device to build up the second love trope in the book and not even an interesting one. literally for a dollar name something about john outside of his love for his wife. you can’t, because the book doesn’t give him anything to work with lol. and if the bigots were honest with themselves they’d admit that the show gave john more depth, care and personality, by fleshing out john as a kind and dignified man who loves his wife and cousin deeply. and was actually afforded the depth and screen-time needed to depict his relationship with fran as a sweet, trusting and fond connection between two people with similar personalities that truly feel safe with each other.
and to me, this only enriches the story for season five because now, not only does fran have to deal with the guilt of moving on with john’s cousin, but now she also has to process that that cousin is also a woman. and will have to confront her actual wants and desires versus just easily accepting the societal traditions she's been conditioned to idealize. and personally, a woman processing her romantic and sexual feelings for another woman in a time when that love wasn't even recognized as legitimate and there was no mainstream culture or language to help one understand those feeling within herself, is a far more compelling story than yet another ‘straight woman falls in love with a straight man' tale, of which there are millions. anyone losing their marbles over this change either needs to reread the book, watch literally any other show or see a psychiatrist because this level of bigotry and backlash is vile and rancid to a pathetic degree.
#RIP eloise bridgerton you would've loved having good writers
I hope everyone who signed petitions to get jess brownell fired for changing michael to michaela is having a terrible day and I hope that everyone who asked for michaela to have a twin brother named michael is having the worst day of their life and I hope that everyone who was nasty to masali for being cast as michaela dies. amen
Rahhh I’m so proud and happy for Masali. Seeing african talents shine on the global stage is the stuff of dreams
Hannah Dodd and Masali Baduza Beckon You Inside Bridgerton Season 5