A Variety of Graphs from "Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics" by Christi Corbett (CLICK ON PERMALINK TO SEE ALL GRAPHS and INDIVIDUAL IMAGES TO VIEW CLOSE UP GRAPHIC).
These from Corbett's report on why there are so few women in in STEM fields reveal that there is an overall disparity in females that major in and pursue careers in engineering and computer science fields versus males, though the trend seems to be getting better.
Figure 6 reveals that women, while lacking in the bachelors degrees of STEM fields in the 1960's, are steadily making increases to their presence in these fields, especially in the biological and life sciences. However, in fields such as engineering, they are still presently only 20% of the population, and in computer science they have actually decreased their presence (Corbett, Figure 6). This relates to several other sources that I gathered, such as anecdotal evidence from SA4 interviews about there not being as many women in engineering as men, the graph of college major choice by Dickson (these are very similar), and what Roca Costa said in her interview with NPR about women feeling alone in engineering courses in college.
Figure 11 reveals reveals roughly the same trends as Figure 6, except this time in terms of STEM careers. It seems that even less women than before actually end up pursing jobs in these fields, even if they received degrees in them (Corbett, Figure 11).
Figure 4 is a graph revealing the advanced scores on AP tests in math and science subjects by gender in 2009. I thought that this was really interesting because it shows that girls are not performing as well as boys in standardized tests in the science fields, (except for computer science, which is interesting because there is actually a decrease in women in that field) (Corbett, Figure 4). However, this reminded me of what Debbie Sterling said in her Ted Talk (link HERE) about how "there was a study done very recently around 65 countries around the world where they tested boys and girls on the same science test. Around the world, girls outperformed the boys, but not in the US. What this study suggests is that it's not a biological thing, this is a cultural thing" (Sterling).
Figure 12a. shows workers with doctorates in computer science fields by gender and employment status. This graph not only shows that there are far greater amounts of men than women getting doctorates in the computer science field (Corbett, Figure 12a.). This relates back to what Debbie Sterling said in her TED talk (link HERE) (Sterling) and what Roca Castro said (link HERE) (Roca Castro) in her NPR interview about women just not fitting in in these fields due to the fact that they are usually the minority gender in these fields.
Overall, these graphs are very helpful as they give concrete, quantitative evidence regarding the topic that I am studying.
Since I am thinking of doing a audio file for my major project 2, I cannot actually use these graphs directly in my project. However, I will likely use my own voice to vocalize what these graphs say and utilize them in that way in order to bring concrete statistical evidence to my project. For example, if I wished to use information from figure six, I would narrate "Based on a report by Christi Corbett, in 2006 59% of biological and agricultural sciences degrees were awarded to women, whereas only 20.5% of computer science degrees were awarded to women in that same year."














