
pixel skylines
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
Today's Document
Jules of Nature
No title available
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
YOU ARE THE REASON
RMH
tumblr dot com
Cosmic Funnies
$LAYYYTER

ellievsbear

tannertan36
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Doug Jones
No title available

titsay
cherry valley forever

No title available
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Switzerland
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from Austria

seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from United States
@foldresearch-blog
visual essay for Punkt Magazine
visual essay for Punkt Magazine
THERE is something faintly subversive about ''Fabric of Vision: Dress and Drapery in Painting,'' the new show at London's National Gallery. Instead of looking at whole paintings, you end up studying their component parts and, yes, the yards of cloth that for centuries provided the mise-en-scène of most figurative art. Indeed, from the Renaissance to the 18th century, more canvas was devoted to the depiction of fabric than to anything else. What better place to start than the fold? Early Renaissance painting was religious and, as such, portrayed people in flowing robes. The compositions were invariably static, yet the folds of the cloth added life. For inspiration, artists turned to Greek statuary, so remarkable in depicting even transparent fabric as it clings to the naked body. By the 15th century, painters had caught on. Flawless depiction of the fold became a testimony to virtuosity.