from the perspective of surface meanings: alternadic languages are sometimes difficult to distinguish from non-alternadic ones, although their grammars are usually many orders of magnitude larger, containing many seemingly redundant means of extrapolating, circulating, co-expressing and diverting meanings; it is replete with efficient means of notating recursive constructions, permitting intricate modalities of reference.
this superficial complexity however masks even stranger rules of construction — each word divides not only into semantic roots, but is capable of being analyzed according to alternadic roots — as curtainless can be sliced into two alternating sequences: utils and cranes; and lacerated can be cut into several strands by alternating between three sequences: let, are and cad. recursive alternadic languages permit abstraction over the alternation process, such that several distinct orders of alternation emerges: we are still at the highest level alternating between one or several sequences, but these sequences themselves are now in turn composed by alternation.
(some further complications await the curious xenolinguist, for while such things are not generally part of standard languages, real world usage of alternadic language often demands free permutation of sequences, or on the other hand complex encoding strategies and recursion patterns, permitting fine-grained negotiation of degrees of privacy or discretion.)
the opportunity to explicitly express multiple levels of meaning and subtext in itself opens up an entire range of communicative and cognitive possibilities, but the surface text is often entirely understandable despite our cognitive gulf with those who can speak these xenolanguages natively, and this attests to a cultural continuity, although the precise and distinct phrasing of a meaning certainly finds itself obscured and distorted when considered only in terms of its zero-level superficial signs
this zero of direct signification — ( )holey darkness — is immense, a site of infinite intensity and production — a creation whose scope is cosmic, and everything that may be given must be (re)produced — perhaps we can say here: even if the given must thereby be simulated, virtualized, only ever to be realized as memories and dreams
it might be noted that alternadic linguists are often confused by the “superficiality” of non-alternadic conceptions of the structure of language… that language might have the structure of an unconscious seems less distinct a proposition when a sentence is consciously constructed to extrude multiplicities at all levels of analysis and synthesis, capable of diversely assembling and variously participating in differing degrees to a virtual infinity of signs.