I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

izzy's playlists!
ojovivo
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
will byers stan first human second

JVL
noise dept.

Discoholic 🪩
Show & Tell
Today's Document

shark vs the universe
One Nice Bug Per Day
sheepfilms

Product Placement
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

@theartofmadeline
NASA

tannertan36

bliss lane
Claire Keane

seen from Italy
seen from Italy

seen from Türkiye

seen from Spain
seen from Venezuela

seen from Kuwait
seen from Malaysia

seen from Romania

seen from Germany

seen from Singapore

seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye
seen from Kenya
seen from South Africa
seen from United States
seen from France
seen from Japan

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
@hamishmacewan
“I think that we, up until at least the mid 70s, really felt that we were still living in the guise of a single and absolute created society. Where there were known truths and known lies and there was no kind of duplicity or pluralism about the things that we believed in. That started to break down rapidly in the 70s and the idea of a duality in the way that we live in. There are always two three four five sides to every question that the singularity disappeared and that I believe has produced such a medium as the Internet which absolutely establishes and shows us that we are living in total fragmentation”
ᴇᴍᴇʀᴀʟᴅ ɢʀᴀᴠᴇs
Based on the “Turning 65” life event as a convenient lens Department of Internal Affairs – Lab+ Service Innovation
“David Bowie as League One football teams: a thread. Burton Albion”
The purpose of a blockchain is to preserve a chain of custody in a hostile/non-cooperative environment, so that whatever it represents can stay permissionless, indiscriminate, inclusive, and peer-to-peer.
I keep seeing a lot of people talking about the merit of “blockchain-backed-XXX” without understanding the purpose of a blockchain. The purpose of a blockchain is to preserve a chain of custody in a hostile/non-cooperative environment, so that whatever it represents can stay permissionless, indiscriminate, inclusive, and peer-to-peer. Arguing the merits of taking some permission-granting *OR* permission-SEEKING entity [e.g. “blockchain-backed-USD” or “blockchain-backed-company”] is like arguing the merits of a horse-drawn automobile. It only works for people who don’t know what the point of an automobile is… The point of an automobile is to function without a horse and the point of a blockchain is to function without permission. This means any entity requiring permission from an authority to exist will find minimal utility from partitioning its value onto a blockchain beyond improving ease of transfer/custody. This is the heart of why there is so much discomfort around the “commodity” vs “security” regulation definitions that SEC is signaling. It exposes so many blockchains as functionally pointless, and so many altcoins as doomed.
“#BoxingDay Pro boxer Richard Lord taught Bowie how to spar in the 80's. Knowing how tough Bowie was, he once said, "I’m one of the few people that punched #DavidBowie in the face and didn’t get the shit beat out of me for it." Here is Lord sparring with Bowie:”
Your attention span sucks because our entire society has been trained to focus on nothing but a constant torrent of trivial data.
The root of this encouragement of fragmented attention is in the political ideal of equality.
Intellectual equality is impossible to establish. Given a mission to establish equality among students, schools adjust protocol to fudge a result that looks like limited success.
To achieve this, schools train students to be distracted and uncomfortable with the long periods of focus and daydreaming that otherwise arise in many people. This prevents individual students from pulling ahead of the herd unless they fall out of line.
If most of the students graduate with mediocre levels of knowledge and skill, that’s less important than if they are all within the same general range of mediocrity. Excellence in anything requires focused practice — when an athlete shows exceptional talent, schools may break some rules to accommodate their longer and more intensive practice hours.
Encouraging such deliberate practice, focus, and the sorting of the capable from the incapable necessarily undermines equality within the greater body of students. In a democracy which is supposed to encourage universal political participation with equal standing for all, this can only be tolerated to the extent to which it’s absolutely necessary.
Permitting this sort of specialization always causes serious ‘disparate impact’ to emerge: women and men will succeed in different areas, different racial groups pull ahead or behind, and some of the duller or more aggressive types are too useless for any responsibility whatsoever.
Training internally fragmented people creates a more similar populace which is less separated into the disparate specialties from which many of our surnames derive. With some help from scientific management, the baker can be interchangeable with the candlestick maker, and the son of the dentist can be encouraged to pursue his dreams to become a circus juggler. This emphasizes the larger political narrative that all people are interchangeable and that all people can determine their own fates if they have good school attendance and study hard enough.
https://twit.tv/shows/twit-bits/episodes/4742