General Planning Theory
I found the article fascinating, as I continued to read more and more possibilities and permutations appeared. Not only in the argument of the article, but in the basis of that argument. Webber seems to be heading for a solution for the "Wicked" problems that he presents and then defines these problems as he sees them. The irony is that he seems to be approaching the "Wicked" problem from the angle of a scientist or engineer, when he states almost definitively that this does not solve these problems. Yet this does not mean that his definition of the problem is unclear or another problem in itself.
Would a communal approach do any better than traditional authority at solving these problems, or are our desires to be "right", follow authority, and remain most interested in our self-interest or group-interest allow a suitable answer for the whole? Interesting to ask, more interesting to try it out. (As there is no definite solution...)















