I will never deny that a man and a woman are biologically different, but you are literally saying that women are biological caregivers and men are biological leaders and that is FALSE. So so false.
So much research has been done and time and time again scientists as well as historians cannot even find a scientific explaination for gender roles and the patriarchy.
There IS absolutely nothing wrong with adhering to certain roles, but it IS wrong to call these ârolesâ biological. Thatâs the lie men have told women and themselves for years, to justify them oppressing the female sex.
The patriarchy is a universal construct and therefore we cannot deny that itâs not by accident that men have always oppressed women, but what you are talking about, is merely a theory, which many modern scientists find very unconvincing, and itâs the patriarchal genes theory. The theory claims that men, fighting each other in their attempts at finding women to impregnate, developed more aggressive genes because the most aggressive men impregnated most women. Whereas the most caring women ended up conceiving the most and raising most children (therefore their dna and genes continued to the next generations). Itâs a surviving strategy that ended up making men more competitive and women more obedient.
But, as I said, itâs a theory, and it can easily be shred to pieces by using the examples of other animals, such as elephants, where the men fight for the ladies, while the ladies stick together and only need each other to raise the babies and stay safe⊠therefore the believe that women are naturally obedient and caring because else they wouldnât survive⊠is sexist and false. And no, itâs certainly not biologically engrained.
There are a dozen other theories out there, most famous one is the muscle power theory, which claims women are oppressed because men are physically strongerâŠ
Gender roles are not beautiful. Theyâre used to oppress and they hold people back in following their dreams, in achieving what lies within their abilities. They are used to make people feel bad because they donât fit into the roles society wants them to be in. They are a social construct. Theyâre problematic and we gotta get rid of them, for men and women both.
Ladies have to be graceful and beautiful for the world to be kind to them? FUCK THAT. They have to be happy, do whatever the hell they want, be brave, intelligent, kind, strong, independent and we shouldnât hold them back with stupid outdated shit like gender roles. We certainly shouldnât romanticise gender roles.
Women should compete with men at work, because currently, itâs pretty damn shocking how little women are represented in most work fields and politics. And if we wanna be cynical and stressed we gonna be pretty damn cynical and stressed. Women should compete a little more, actually, that way we might actually finally get that freaking equal pay we damnwell deserve!
And if men are being shit and trash, we WILL work agains them. Weâll protest and use our voice to fight for our basic human rights. Weâll protest and do all we can to stop them from doing the wrong thing.
And weâre not gonna support their gender roles, because theirs are as unhealthy as ours. Men can be helpers and caretakers and as beautiful as they like! Men cannot be feminised because there is not such thing as feminising. Feminising is as much a social construct as gender roles.
If you think gender roles are a fine line between chaos and order and the definition of teamwork you are a sexist dickhead and you have to shut the fuck up.
prguitarman
stormborns
yousharknotpass
blakekathryn
dailybridgerton
