On the whole "are masks constitutional" debate:
I'm pretty sure both sides are wrong. It is fully possible I'm remembering things wrong but I'm pretty sure it boils down to this:
Being forced to wear a mask does not violate the letter of the law.
It possibly violates the spirit of the law, but that argument does hinge on whether you judge the freedom of the people or the life of the people as being more important.
Seeing as how, traditionally, when it comes to constitutional law both the letter and the spirit of the law are equally important, both sides are wrong.
It is neither fully protected nor condemned by the constitution.
(The following rant is not intended for people with LEGITIMATE health concerns that make wearing a mask a serious health issue.)
But honestly, if you are so against wearing a mask that you feel the need to claim it violates the law set forth by the constitution, then you are part of the problem. You are part of the reason we are still dealing with the damn virus.
My right to throw a punch ends where your nose begins.
Your right to go without a mask ends when it endangers another person.
How the fuck can we claim America is the greatest nation when you fucktards don't give a flying fuck about your fellow citizens?
You are not protecting your rights and freedoms by protesting the masks.
You are being a spoiled, selfish child with no regard for the life of anyone else. Right now, we live in a world where a single cough or sneeze can literally end someone's life and we have no way of knowing exactly who is safe and who is infected.
Is being able to see your pretty face really worth more than the life of another human being?
If not wearing a mask is really more important to you than not killing someone else, then you need to take a long hard look at yourself because basic human compassion should not be this damn hard for anyone to understand.
discoholicmusic
titsay
stormborns
prguitarman
andulkaphoto
tangentwithtanner
ellievsbear