mod neil marshall’s comprehensive joe darke defense analysis
now, I know what you’re thinkin, pardner. joe darke? that serial killer from the ace attorney case famous for bein added on afterwards, bein Too Fuckin Long, and kinda retconning edgeworth’s character arc?
well if you’ll remember, rise from the ashes and the entire sl-9 incident hinges on the fact that most of the evidence was either forged or sent floatin down the river, and ain’t nobody found the body. of the evidence, that is. the forged evidence.
how, i gotta ask, did a team of detectives and prosecutors know, for a fact, that joe darke, famously described as the murderer in a case with no solid evidence against him (aside from his own confession – which don’t necessarily indicate guilt), was guilty? the answer? they didn’t
joe darke got put out to pasture based on forged ‘n concealed evidence and he never got a proper defense. now, am i sayin’ he definitely ain’t guilty? naw. he did confess, after all, and that’s gotta be taken into consideration, pardner. but all i’m sayin is he was convicted on falsified evidence and every cowpoke deserves a fair trial
anyway justice for joe darke i guess yeehaw
-mod neil marshall
so true pardner
-mod jake marshall (back from hiatus)
