kat

archived blog, my new blog is @katep4d (:

[katep4d-art-archive]

emergency commissions!

i’m opening up commissions at a discount for the foreseeable future as i’ve been struggling to pay my bills lately. i’m happy to accommodate any budget as any income possible would really help right now

here are examples of my realistic work:

this would usually cost around £60-£100 but i’m happy to negotiate! no price is too little

here are examples of my stylised work:

this can cost anywhere between £25-£80, i am also happy to negotiate this

this is probably a shot in the dark but you’ve gotta try anything o: thank you for reading

[katep4d-art-archive]

i did some realism for the throwback

[katep4d-art-archive]

i changed my hair once again so it’s self portrait time !!!

[katep4d-art-archive]

i redrew the mommy ‼️‼️‼️‼️

[katep4d-art-archive]

art dump bc i’ve not been around

[katep4d-art-archive]

moon music

[katep4d-art-archive]

this has been in my drafts for over a month and i finally finished it i love u raiden mains

[katep4d-art-archive]

@strange-aeons reached one mil so i had to draw the myth, the legend, the goth (if you couldn’t tell) in respects

[katep4d-art-archive]

raquelle stans where are you

[katep4d-art-archive]

new pfp

[queen-boobcinda]

🤲🤲🤲

what silly little guys . they are so silly and goofy

[mariluphoto]

Why real artists NEED to be protected from AI.

Full article here.

[hellyeahheroes]

Now on some good news

Artstation protest against allowing AI-generated art on the platform, which took form of artists flooding the site with pictures saying NO AI ART, has utterly fucked up AI Art generators that were sampling art trending on artstation without permission. Thus proving that all these generators do indeed steal artwork.

-Admin

[katep4d-art-archive]

FINALLY she’s being punished for her crimes

[loish]

There’s a protest going on against AI art over on artstation, so I feel like now is the time for me to make a statement on this issue! 

I wholeheartedly support the ongoing protest against AI art. Why? Because my artwork is included in the datasets used to train these image generators without my consent. I get zero compensation for the use of my art, even though these image generators cost money to use, and are a commercial product. 

Musicians are not being treated the same way. Stability has a music generator that only uses royalty free music in their dataset. Their words: “Because diffusion models are prone to memorization and overfitting, releasing a model trained on copyrighted data could potentially result in legal issues.” Why is the work of visual artists being treated differently?

Many have compared image generators to human artists seeking out inspiration. Those two are not the same. My art is literally being fed into these generators through the datasets, and spat back out of a program that has no inherent sense of what is respectful to artists. As long as my art is literally integrated into the system used to create the images, it is commercial use of my art without my consent.

Until there is an ethically sourced database that compensates artists for the use of their images, I am against AI art. I also think platforms should do everything they can to prevent scraping of their content for these databases. 

Artists, speak out against this predatory practice! Our art should not be exploited without our consent, and we deserve to be compensated when our art is exploited for commercial use. 

[queen-boobcinda]

i create too much aphmau related content so it’s all going on a dedicated blog now

[katep4d-art-archive]

“this looks amazing! what program did you use to m—”