hi um could you help me? i know that skinny-fying canonically fat characters is wrong but some ppl are defending it by saying it's the same as making a canonically skinny character fat. i know that this isn't the case and theyre not the same thing but idk how to explain it
Oh yeah you see people arguing that a lot. It's an argument that indicates how they're either completely ignorant of or willfully turning a blind eye to the current state of fat representation in both the media at large & in fandoms.
The essential points are as follows:
there is infinitely less, worse and more negative representation of fat bodies than there is of thin bodies right now
good representation is incredibly important to people who don't otherwise have much of it, usually marginalized groups. for a lot of reasons.
So because good fat representation is so rare, it's especially important to us that what little we have respected and preserved by fans and creators alike. When you can only maybe list 10 examples of positive fat characters off the top of your head, taking away even one of them is a big deal.
Meanwhile, thin characters that are portrayed as positive? Literally everywhere. Literally in everything, filling 99-100% of all casts. In everything. If I could write all the positive fat characters I can think of 2 squares of toilet paper, it would take me 10 entire rolls of toilet paper at least to list all the positive thin characters I can think of.
So when people draw thin characters as fat, they are taking away one tiny drop in a vast ocean of thin characters. And when people draw fat characters as thin, they're taking a big gulp out of the one water bottle you have, as a dehydrated person in the desert. If it sounds imbalanced to compare those two things, considering this, then you’re correct.
Also, in general, fat characters are drawn as thin A LOT more than thin characters are drawn as fat, in fandoms. For every chubby Lapis drawing there's probably 200 thin Rose Quartz drawings. I wish that was an exaggeration - if anything, I'm probably underestimating the number of thin Roses.
Also, there's the difference in fat vs thin representation even in fanart. Thin fanart is overwhelming positive, and portraying the new thin body the character has as normal, beautiful, pretty, sexy and good.
Meanwhile, a lot of fat fanart of thin characters in fandom is less than positive representation. A lot of it is either fatphobic (e.g. showing the newly fat character as being ugly and gross) or fat fetishistic (which is often unrealistic, sexualized, and not meant to show realistic fat bodies or be for real fat people). Very little fat fanart of thin characters is realistic, positive and just meant to make fat fans happy.
So basically, fat representation both in fandom and the media at large is still in a pretty scant & shitty place, and thin bodies are represented infinitely more & more positively to boot. And when I say “infinitely more,” that isn’t hyperbole. That’s pretty realistic.
Overall, anyone who equates drawing fat characters as thin with drawing thin characters as fat should probably be ignored, bc they just don't know what the fuck they're talking about. They literally haven't done even an iota of research or given a single fuck about the subject, or they'd realize what they're saying is laughable to anyone who's actually looked even a little bit at how both of those phenomena manifest in fandom spaces. and who care about fat representation in the slightest.