what?

mj, she/her, 20. Ao3: kublakola

[cherriielle]

bbc merlin you will ALWAYS be famous

[snowdazzle]

Dunk: what do you mean

[orientalld]

[weeping-six]

You know... like that one image... yeah

FNV having a perfect balance betwen gay and straight human companions makes me wonder if they were planing something but ran out of time. mmhhh

[bluvcy]

headrest 💤

[slowburnlover]

Mel and her ED friends, the two black cat coded sarcastic assholes that are softer with her and hate each other 🤝🏻 Trinity and her ED friends, the two blondes that look like victorian sickly children who can't catch a social cue or pop culture reference to save their lives

[deadclawshc]

he’s so cutie

[jennipond]

we are so close to seeing The Duo on screen

[everburningbutt]

:3

[kublakola]

knowing that Michaela is already canonically in love with Fran is soooo fucking buzzy... like when she's teasing Fran about her puzzles? she thinks that's adorable. when they're arguing? she thinks that's hot. when they're giggling together at the breakfast table? she has fucking butterflies, she's kicking herself for having such massive unwieldy feelings for someone so impossibly unavailable, she's giddy just to be in her company, she hates herself for desiring her cousin's wife, she is falling deeper and deeper in love with the sound of her laughter. and Fran's just there like Yay :) I made a new friend :) John will be so pleased! :)))

their confessions are going to blow every other couple's out of the waterrrr NOBODY is ready for what's about to be on our screens

[kublakola]

I literally can't believe we're getting a multi-season slow burn bickering-to-friends-to-lovers lesbian love story set in the 1800s with two of the most beautiful women I have ever seen before involved. We're not supposed to get this... like this is against the rules of TV or something idk it feels fucking surreal

[kublakola]

we might be getting this in 2027..... good lord.......... I'm getting dizzy just thinking about it

[unfunsized]

[kublakola]

Just watched Pride and Prejudice (2005) for the first time... you guys weren't kidding that really is the most romantic movie ever made

[kublakola]

"Francesca needs to have biological children so that she knows she's not broken" so you admit you think infertile women are broken. So you think that infertility is a character flaw or a personal failing instead of a completely uncontrollable and morally neutral state of being. I hope that Francesca and Michaela are able to build a family together, but if you think the only way to resolve an infertility plotline is to reward the woman with a magically functioning womb you're fucking crazy... she needs to learn that she is more than what society demands from her and that both Michaela AND John (before his passing) love her far beyond her ability to provide an heir. She is not broken!!!! She does not need a biological baby to have a happy ending!!!!!! You people are under SPELLLS!!!!

[griffnoir]

apples crisp, knighthood acquired, new house thriving, wife secured, heir on the way, business expanding, congratulations ser raymun of the green apple fossoway YOU are the winner

[maidenvault]

Not “Only my reading of canon is correct” or “Interpretations are subjective and all valid” but a secret third thing, “More than one interpretation can be valid but there’s a reason your English teacher had you cite quotes and examples in your papers, you have to have a strong argument that your interpretation is actually supported by the text or it is just wrong and I’m fine with telling you it’s wrong, actually.”

[mooncustafer]

If the text says the curtains are blue you can argue about what that means; but if you’re going to claim they’re actually yellow you’d better have a really good argument.

[xwilltruman]

i know the curtains better than the author. thank you for coming to my ted talk

[maidenvault]

Fandom has such unresolved mommy/daddy issues about authors. If you apply a little reading comprehension skills to my original post you’ll see I didn’t say anything at all about the author. You guys always make “interpretation” about your beef with the author. You’re all obsessed with the author. This post is just about deciphering what is there in canon. Figuring out what is being communicated by the canon itself with all the words and images and basic formal elements that are there in canon. That’s all it’s about. It really doesn’t matter if the author intentionally put all those things there in a pattern that might support the idea that this one character’s queer. That’s not what this is about. What matters is if you can compellingly argue there’s a pattern of evidence there. Or not. Everyone is conspiring together to make me go insane still adding shit about authorial intent on my post.

[kublakola]

my love for Lady Francesca Stirling Countess of Kilmartin is something so serious..... I don't fuck around about her at ALL that's literally the baby deer I found injured in the forest and raised as my own. that's my gentle quiet willowy occasionally bratty angel like you all don't get her like I do