A NEW PROSPECTIVE ON BRIDGERTONâ¨
Part three:
Itâs clear: Bridgerton is not a masterpiece and also the representation she makes of sexuality is, after all, rigid, glossy, plastic, one could even venture graphic in its implicit performance; there is not a shred of truth at any time. This is inevitable - and has always been programmatic in Netflix productions - when you only show what you can bend to the caption, to a socially uplifting message. Human relationships are complex and not at all 'sanitized', but Netflix does not care about that relational complexity and that's okay: this duly stated, by Bridgerton, a mainstream product that, yes, puts too much meat on the fire without ever going deeper, you can certainly another to appreciate the desire to take a step towards the future, in overthrowing those who, even today, remain in our society as a clichĂŠ or, worse, taboo. If freeing the female representation from an erotic gaze and applying that same gaze to the masculine is neither a novelty nor a reason for merit, the same cannot be said of the narrative space dedicated, especially in the context of a period drama, to the 'blessing' and to the enhancement of the female determination to understand and experience a little more all the possibilities of access to her own sexuality.















