OH YEAH I FORGOT TO PUT MY QUANTUM TAOISM YAP ON HERE UH HERE YOU GO BEHOLD SHITTY METAPHYSICS
binaries (i.e. systems consisting of a 1 or a 0) apply to reality (i.e. subjects and objects either existing or not existing) apply to statements (i.e. information that is either true or false). however, what of decimals (e.g. 0.5, 0.2, 0.314159, 0.9999999...)? what of numbers outside of 1 and 0 (e.g. 3, 4, 5, 6, etc.)? do they not also exist? and as such could they be applied towards reality and statements as binaries do? frankly i don't know but hey it works a fair analogy for what i'm talking about.
quantum taoism dictates as such: all of reality, psychology, mathematics, logic, information, consciousness, and a bunch of other stuff can be categorised into 4 forms (plus 1 paraform which i'll get into later trust)
the first two are the real forms, or the visible forms; forms that very apparent and present in the reality you and i experience
form 1: truth, 1, existence, etc. when an object proves to exist, or consist entirely of things that exist. an apple exists, in its entirety without any degree of not existing. when a statement is true and all of its contents are correct.
form 2: false, 0, nonexistence, etc. something that does not exist, is not true, or otherwise is not. a flongenheible does not, will not, and has never existed to any degree of sensibility with the set of qualities i imagine it to have.
the next two are the hypothetical forms, or the paradoxical forms; states of being/information that only exist in extreme states, universes and rules beyond our own, or in incredibly metaphysical states (such as quantum particles, the order of the universe, gods, etc.)
from 3: fuzzy, decimal, semi-real, etc. states of partial existence/nonexistence in a single subject simultaneously or states of partial truth or falsity in a given statement to each respective subject covered and described in the statement. describing the location of a quantum particle, e.g. particle J is 2 nanometres to the left of particle Q, though not incorrect, is also not correct. it is partially true as particle J exists in multiple locations at once due quantum fudgery and an uncollapsed wavelength (yes i know that's a lazy and badly explained example but i'm running off of a ciggie and half a bird skeleton okay give me a break).
form 4: okay this is weird(er) one. if 1 is existing. 0 is not. and fuzzy is decimals. what is 2? what is 34? what is -2390762? that's the fourth form. degrees of existence that go beyond simply existing or not existing. okay maybe the other numbers analogy is wrong since once could argue that's hyperreality but still. a state of being, or a degree of truth that is neither and both at once.
an example might make it easier:
let's look at the complex statement "more people have been to germany than i have" (i talk about complex forms later). the main aspect is the comparison of "the people who have been to germany". if that number is x and y is "than i have", the context of this comparison being in regards to the going to of germany (which we will call z), meaning the sentence can be broken does as within the context of z, x>y. but here's the issue, z is true, x is dependant on y, but then y? well y isn't true. it isn't false. and it certainly isn't a bit of both. it's paradoxical. it's some vague nonsensical set of logic that goes beyond the simple binary.
oh i just made it worse maybe i'm bad at explaining things uhhhhhh.
okay to put it simply the fourth form covers information and a state of being that is neither true nor false, existent nor nonexistent, etc.
and finally, the 5th para-form. complex statements. everything consists of a bunch of smaller things, and typically they consist of a homogenous set of these forms. a chair consists of a trillion trillion atoms, all of which definitely exist. furthermore, a magical globernshmipper is made of aspects that though might exist in other contexts and complex forms, do not exist in that context. so what if a statement/object consists of some aspects that are true, and some that are not? or godforbid an aspect is a third or fourth form? complex forms! some things consist of multiple conflicting aspects, which, when these aspects are true upon a counterpart being false, can be prone to "paradoxes" but not the kind i talked about earlier. (think "this statement is false", the two main aspects are that the statement refers to this statement, and that said self-referring statement is false, both rely upon the other being a certain way which violates the other, a complex statement of two conflicting forms)
now you might be confused since i've been using 1, real, or true interchangeably since the start and the reason why is as follows: quantum taoism is universal. it applies to logic, as it finds its roots in binaries and trues and falses, as it does to existence, as it can be directly compared to things existing, not existing, somewhat existing, or something else entirely. it is a categorisation of all things (and also consciousness but that's a whole other things that i'd need 2 maybe 3 monsters to break down fully).
think reality. everyone is constant argument as to whether reality is a sea of chaos, or an ordered system defined by rules and logic. quantum taoism dictates as such. it is both! all of reality can be explained by rules, arguing that the universe is a logical one (that's physics baby!), rules that will always have or be able to have outliers (think the cosmic fudgery that is quantum physics, with constant violations of otherwise followed rules), arguing that it is therefore a sea of chaos that happens to follow certain patterns at times. but at a wider scope those outliers too can be explained by newer and stranger rules (quantum physics baby!!!!), which in turn will eventually also have outliers, etc.etc.etc.
this is because, all chaos can be described with a rule, and all rules can be seen as rationalisations of a chaotic universe. if chaos is a sea and rules are a wall around the ocean, then all of everything is an infinite expanse of oceans around walls around oceans around walls etc. this is turn is also an order, which too is prone to chaos. a snake eating a snake eating a snake eating a snake each snake also eating its tail. a fractal! everything is a fractal! the order of the fractal also prone to chaos which in turn is part of a greater fractal! a fractal of fractals of fractals!
so now, let's categorise the universe into the quantum taoist forms. if order is 1, and chaos is 0, then the universe and all of everything is a paradoxical form, as it simultaneously is both ordered and chaotic and neither of them all at once.
the universe is a fourth form complex state of chaos and order.
even quantum taoism is prone to failings, its outliers in turn being an aspect of its greater rules! yes that makes it unfalsifiable i know but still!
