Trapped in our homes, with online poker still not available in much of the country, many of us have become more poker fan than poker player this spring. But luckily we fans are about to receive a much-needed gift straight from the Ghost of Poker Past.
In the summer of 2010, Dr. Bill Chen—math PhD, personal friend, and all-around genius (although he seems to lose his cash or his phone roughly every other day)—faced the great Phil Ivey heads-up for a bracelet in the $3k HORSE event at the World Series of Poker. Late in the match, the following hand came up during the Limit Hold ’Em round.
Bill raised from the small blind button and Phil called from the big blind. Phil led with a bet on the flop of As Th 2h and Bill called. Phil continued with a bet on the 9c turn, and then Bill raised. Phil called and checked the 7h river. Bill bet, Phil check-raised, and Bill folded. Action-packed hand, no? Don’t you wish you knew what they both had?
Well, now we will. Reliable sources tell me all hole cards will be revealed during Bill’s appearance on Jennifer Shahade’s The GRID podcast. We’re about to get a glimpse into the ten-year-old strategies of two of the top Limit Hold ‘Em players at the time, and rumor has it the results are more than a little surprising!
In advance of the podcast, I thought I’d do an analysis the usual way—without knowing the hands. While Limit Hold ’Em is my best game, I don’t have a ton of experience with heads-up play, so cut me some slack if I miss a trick!
Preflop, Bill will be raising his button with around 90 percent of hands, and Phil will be defending his big blind with at least that many. About all we can say so far is that Bill cannot have the very worst starting hands (72o, 93o, etc.), and that Phil is unlikely to hold a premium hand like a big pair or a big ace. Three-betting from the big blind is much more common heads-up than in a ring game, and Phil would want to build the pot with his best holdings, but we can’t completely rule out the possibility that he is slowplaying for deception.
Phil’s lead on the As Th 2h gives a hint of just how ahead of his time Mr. Ivey was. Limit players in 2010 (and indeed, most players in the $40-$80 games I play in today) were extremely reluctant to lead out from the big blind into a raiser, especially on an ace-high board. We now know from seeing solver solutions that this play should be a fairly normal part of the arsenal, but in 2010 this was the bet of a confident, world-class player bucking “standard” lines. That said, it’s hard to narrow Phil’s range very much based on this bet. He’s probably weighted toward weak aces, flush draws, and other one-pair hands, but he could have just about anything with at least some frequency. There are a relatively large number of hands in Bill’s button range that he simply has to fold to a bet on this flop (undercards to the ten, random queen-highs, suited jacks without the backdoor draw, etc.), so Phil potentially has good bluffing value with any two cards getting 4-1 on his money.
Bill’s call tells us nothing except that he doesn’t have one of the folding hands I mentioned above. Bill would likely slowplay his monsters here, as I know he subscribes to the (very solid) idea that it’s good to disguise information in the first two betting rounds before the bets double in a Limit game. Bill could have anything from queen-high to a set, and he could have any backdoor flush draw or gutshot straight draw or better draw.
The turn is where it gets interesting, and where we can finally start to narrow the ranges. Phil continues with another bet when the 9c falls, which means we can now pretty much rule out his total bluffs. But he can probably still have any gutshot, open-ender, flush draw, or any of the made hands he led the flop with.
When Bill raises, suddenly his range goes from very wide to quite narrow. His minimum value hand is probably a strong ace—say AQ—or better. With any worse one pair hands or hands with showdown value like king-high, Bill probably just calls. Any open-ender or flush draw could potentially be in his semibluff range (note that Js8s, a hand with which Bill would’ve peeled the flop, is now an open-ender, as is QJ). If he raises with all those possible bluffs he would be raising too many hands and Phil would likely show a profit calling down with anything. So Bill has to keep his frequencies in mind when picking his semibluffs. Whether he will assign those frequencies based on some predetermined, game theoretically sound method like looking at his watch, or whether he will decide based on game flow or opponent tendencies, or whether he will pick only certain hands to bluff with is something only Bill knows for sure. If Bill took the last approach, then he could, for example, choose not to semibluff QJ, and give himself a balanced-looking raising range of Js8s, flush draws with no showdown value, and his strong hands.
Phil calls the raise, which probably means we can rule out the very strongest hands from his range, as top two pair or better would like to three-bet for value on this draw-heavy board. How stubborn will Phil get with his calling range? He is probably hanging on to almost any pair getting 6-1 on his money, but he can safely fold his weakest draws like the 54 or 43 gutshots. If he did bet the turn with any low pocket pairs, he can probably fold those as well, since they often have only two outs.
The 7h on the river completes the flush draw, and also completes two straight draws—86 (which is an unlikely holding for either player) and J8, which either player can plausibly have. After Phil checks, Bill will likely show down with his one pair hands, and maybe even with his weakest two pair hands on such a scary river. With a good two pair or better, though, he’ll be compelled to bet for value. And since all his flush draws have now converted to value bets, he can probably go ahead and bluff with any busted straight draws in his range. But if he doesn’t raise the turn with QJ, he really doesn’t have any bluffs here! This is an example of why it’s usually better to tweak frequencies than to pick and choose specific hands to bluff with. As long as Bill threatens to have QJ, then he has a few bluffs to go with all his value on his river. Bill did say on Twitter recently (with no memory of what he had, by the way!—we’re relying on his friend Matt Hawrilenko to remember Bill’s cards for us), that “with QJ I may not bluff vs Ivey, just show down. That’s why it’s a little inconsistent.”
Indeed, if Bill would show down QJ here, then it’s even harder to find his bluffs, which means that when Ivey check-raises the river and Bill folds, Bill would’ve had to have a value hand! It’s rare in Limit Hold ’Em that you bet for value and then fold to a raise, but it is definitely correct to have this plan occasionally. Did Bill really make a thin value bet with something like AQ, only to fold it to Ivey’s raise? It seems hard to believe, knowing how much Bill hates folding.
Phil has some obvious value hands in his raising range (namely flushes and straights), which means he can and should have some bluffs to go with them. Like Bill, Phil’s most likely bluffing hand is QJ, but it’s at least possible to imagine him also holding Q8 with some small frequency.
Knowing that the results are going to be “fun”, as the insiders seem to be saying, I’ll risk looking very silly and make a guess as to what they both had. Bill: QJ, Phil: Q8.
Looking forward to listening to the big reveal on The GRID!
Matt Matros is a three-time World Series of Poker bracelet winner, poker instructor, and the author of the strategy/memoir The Making of a Poker Player. His new book, The Game Plan, is available now from Amazon. Want to see how the Game Plan would apply to a hand you’ve played? Write Matt at [email protected].
Sign up for Matt’s mailing list here.
andulkaphoto
izzy806
dailybridgerton
amandla
origamiaround
pixelskylines