NASA
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
Today's Document

tannertan36
Xuebing Du
sheepfilms

Product Placement

if i look back, i am lost
we're not kids anymore.
Show & Tell
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Keni
No title available

blake kathryn
Mike Driver
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
$LAYYYTER

Discoholic 🪩

pixel skylines

Andulka
seen from Malaysia
seen from Poland
seen from Netherlands

seen from Ireland

seen from United States

seen from Latvia
seen from Poland

seen from Ireland
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Germany

seen from Ireland

seen from Ireland
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from Poland
@midjourney-love
you’re engaging in truly brainless behavior. delete your account
Aw did a little piss baby get mad they liked an aesthetic post and it was AI? end it all fam
If you think judging people for using ai is helping anyone or actually a good take, read this please.
I understand where the anger comes from. When we see automation threatening livelihoods, the instinct is to push back hard. But we need to look at who we are actually fighting, because tearing each other down over using tools is not the win for the working class that people think it is.
There is a massive difference between a strategic boycott and rejecting a technological concept.
When we boycott Starbucks, we are targeting a specific corporation because of their specific actions—like union busting and mistreating workers. That is a tactical move to force a bad actor to change. But you cannot "boycott" machine learning. That is like trying to boycott the concept of automation or the internet.
Machine learning, in and of itself, is just a technology. It is a leap forward in how we process information. To be against the very concept of it isn't revolutionary; it’s actually a step backward. It’s ceding the future to the billionaires instead of fighting for the people to have a say in how that future looks.
The problem isn’t the technology; the problem is Capitalism.
The reason AI feels like a threat right now is that under our current economic system, efficiency benefits the owners, not the workers. When a machine can do a job, capitalism says "fire the worker," whereas a humane system would say "now the worker has to work fewer hours for the same pay."
This is where the idea of "No Ethical Consumption Under Late Capitalism" is important. It doesn't mean "everything is bad so nothing matters." It means that individual consumer choices cannot fix systemic exploitation.
When you attack a fellow worker—an artist, a writer, a student, or a small business owner—for using AI to help them survive in a gig economy that demands impossible output, you aren't hurting the tech giants. Google and OpenAI do not care if you bully a freelancer on Twitter.
All that does is divide us. It creates a purity test that turns potential allies into enemies.
If we want to actually help people, we shouldn't be screaming at individuals for using the tools available to them. We should be directing that energy upward. We need to be fighting for regulation, for fair compensation, for labor protections, and for a world where automation liberates us from drudgery rather than starving us.
Don't let them convince you that your enemy is the guy using ChatGPT to write an email. We are all stuck in this machine together. Let's focus on breaking the system, not the other people trying to survive it.
made with Google AI