Final display and evaluation
Here is a image which showcase the finished final display ready for the degree show, it consists of two Di-bond blueprints and three anatomical models of the heart.
I think that the work is very successful in terms of fulfilling the brief at the start of the project to discuss how technological advancements will effect the medical industry and the integration between technology inside the body.
I think that the prints are successful as they give the audience a deeper understanding of how the company that produces these hearts which I created (Biotech) operates in the future and they also give a better understanding of how the products work especially when they discuss what each part of the heart MK 2 does.
The display as a whole is good because it has enough space around the base for the audience to move around and interact with the models from all angles and is also at a good height and with to suit the needs of the public.
I have also added a spotlight above the plinth so that the models will be well lit meaning the viewer will be able to get a detailed look at the plinths even in low light.
The models in which I have created show a variety of different options when it comes to choosing what upgrade you want each has a specific purpose.
Which Model works best ?
In my opinion I find the model on the right to be the best in terms of finish because of its shape which is simple in comparison to the others it made it easier to apply paint to the Model.
I also really like the 3D printed one in the centre, however when getting a model 3D printed it leaves a lot of support material which is hard to remove fully therefore it leaves a rough edge on the bottom, if I were to remake these I would consider getting the 3D printed ones done by an external company that uses a more advanced 3D printer which will reduce the amount of support material present.
Overall as a collective they are highly successful as they help educate the public on what the heart transplants look like and work perfectly alongside the 2 dimensional works to strengthen the narrative and effectively communicate the futuristic body shop aesthetic.
The plinth also played a big part in terms of display, it uses its complex shape and colours to represent the medical future themes whilst still allowing the plinth to be functional.
Evaluation
As I mentioned earlier I think that the work is very successful in terms of fulfilling the brief at the start of the project to discuss how technological advancements will effect the medical industry and the integration between technology inside the body.
I will use this evaluation to discuss things that went well and things that didn’t within the project and how I would make changes if I were to repeat the process.
What went well :
* I really enjoyed using different forms of making and drawing techniques to develop ideas throughout the project, especially the digital forms of making like solidworks, photoshop, 2d design which are all programs which I am confident in and for me moving between the two dimensional and three dimensional forms is the way I like to make.
* I found that creating a narrative really helped to fully form my ideas, I created a narrative by creating a company, logo and Olympic event although If I had more time I think that I would expand on these a little bit more.
* Experimenting with different material processes when making models even low-fi helped to develop my ideas further through making and gave me an idea of the materials that worked in terms of my themes and skill set.
What could be improved upon :
* I found it was hard to mange my time in some aspects of the project like when making my three dimensional models and plinths, even though I started making them in advance the nature of the making with the models it took several bookable slots to get each section of a model cut. I tried to counter this by booking slots as soon as they became available on moodle and also booking slots at Parkside for when the Margret street workshop was full.
* Research during the project I have conducted a lot of research but I found that the subject of medical science was a very broad one and it was hard to narrow down to a specific aspect. If I were to re do the project I would pick a specific body part and medical advancement from the offset.
In-conclusion I think the modelling and generating of ideas, research went quite well but my time management and narrowing down my ideas to a specific subject could be refined in future projects.
During my three years at Margret street I have been able to develop my practice and I have been very happy with the final outcome of my project overall and I think that the final degree show will be an exciting one considering all of the work we have produced as a collective.









