A video of our final performance
Game of Thrones Daily
trying on a metaphor
Jules of Nature
cherry valley forever
d e v o n
No title available
will byers stan first human second
One Nice Bug Per Day
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

bliss lane
almost home

titsay
EXPECTATIONS
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Stranger Things
𓃗
NASA

Product Placement
art blog(derogatory)
Monterey Bay Aquarium

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Thailand

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from Australia

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye

seen from Australia
seen from Spain
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Argentina

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany
seen from Argentina
@objectificationcbl-blog
A video of our final performance
Here is a video of one of our first rehearsals, incorporating sound, set and movement. Here we discovered the difficulties with timing the bucket movement at the end of the performance in relation to the audio. We later amended this by adding in an extra sound before the end of the track, indicating to Avra when to move.
Once we had constructed/found all the objects needed for the set, we set them up and began working out our movement sequence in relation to the audio we had created. In this photograph we were exploring the use of levels and how best to use water in our performance.
Experimenting with the coffin/box once constructed. We used polythene for the majority of the set and costume. We liked the translucency of the material and it's clinical feel. The aesthetic is futuristic, industrial and controlled.
Constructing the glass coffin/frame in the wood workshop
Let's Start Over...
So we had been working on the project for a couple of months, researching, developing ideas, experimenting with the mannequin and our own bodies. We had developed an idea that would present recorded sexually objectifying images on monitors with a live performance by 'human mannequins' using the text we had created. However, none of us felt happy with this idea. I think it felt too obvious, to run of the mill, to in your face. We had just been to see 'Blurred Lines' at The Shed, and it just made me feel like the subject of feminism had been done to death in the theatre by using cliches and offered no catharsis, no hope for the future. So we sat down and decided to start afresh. We wanted to use all of our research, but wanted to make our work more conceptual than direct in it's communication. I made a tally of the things we liked, and we decided to form our performance from these shared interests, as artists we have very different ways of working and aesthetics.
THINGS WE LIKE
Visually:
Box
Minimal, white
Room B105
Industrial/Mechanical
Plastic
In terms of performance:
Movement
Relationship between body and space
In regards to theme:
The human body
Perception- breaking down/deconstructing
Oppression
Hierarchy
Water Torture/Water as Life/Water as a cycle WATER
Feminism
SO from this, I devised this drawing:
We would create a performance about the cyclical nature of oppression. The characters we play will be uniform in appearance, veering away from human, and simply 'being'. The three positions of the structure present different ways in which a hierarchy oppresses everyone within it's structure. The person at the top of the ladder, pouring the water onto the person with the box, is in the position of high power. However, there is little stability to be found here, as the ladder has thin rungs to stand on and there is a vulnerability in having that much height above the rest. The idea of administering water on the head is inspired by the idea of Japanese Water Torture. There is an element of control in using the pipette, there is also something phallic about the shape of the pipette, perhaps lending to the idea of a patriarchal society.
The person in the box is trapped by the cycle. Where the person in the box can see the rest of the world clearly, those observing from the outside can only see a shadow, not the full nature of the being. This person is submissive to the oppressor above, unable to move from their position, yet aware of the nature of their entrapment. Inspired by the idea of the glass ceiling, and from Anita's interview when a man told her he would like to 'keep her in a glass coffin and look at her' as she was so beautiful. The person on the floor, dunking their own head in the bucket, drowning themselves, is a representation of how objectification, control and oppression can lead to self destruction. The way in which the three characters move shows that this cycle can be changed, that different positions can be assumed. Each performer moves in their own way in each position, demonstrating that we are all the equal yet at the same time we retain our individual essence. The climax of the performance is on the deconstruction of the cycle, the breaking of the mould. The oppressor climbs down the ladder to free the person in the glass coffin. Together they cut through the structure, and walk together as one towards the victim of the cycle. Slowly, they pull the victim from the water, and draw them up toward them, arms crossing, a symbol of the trinity, three, stability. The cycle is finally broken by the victim throwing the water out of the bucket. This a sign that anything is possible, change can come, and will.
Mannequin
Objectification Interviews
From my experience with being turned into a human mannequin, and whilst thinking about times where I have been sexually objectified, I carried out a series of interviews. I wanted to discover from my peers how they felt about sexual objectification, if they had ever experienced it and whether they found any correlation between the medias obsession with sexualisation and behaviour within their own interpersonal relationships.
I interviewed both men and women, the outcomes of these interviews were fascinating, so I noted down their dictation. I would like to create a script from these interviews and carry out more.
Here is the transcription, and above are the audio clips:
1
Well, there was this one time when my girlfriend asked me how tall I was. I told her, six foot three. She was pretty impressed by this, she said she found it super sexy. She told me how much she liked my body, how she finds my stature enticing and likes the way I use my strength. I felt pretty good abouy it. Then later she sent me a text which read “I’ve been thinking about what I said earlier, about your sexy body and all that, and I feel a bit bad. I don’t want you to feel objectified for your height. I think you have a great body, but I also love you for your amazing personality too. It’s like a nice tall bonus on to an already amazing person.” It was pretty hilarious.
But have I ever really felt objectified? No, I don’t think I have. I don’t really think about it to be honest. I just sort of go out and live my life. I mean, do girls… wait I guess yeah, girls must have to think about it a lot. It’s different isn’t it? It’s like, when they go out they have to deal with people making comments about their appearance and they have to experience a lot more prejudice towards them. It must be really hard come to think of it. I guess I’d never really considered it before because ‘ve never had to deal with it first hand.
2
I think so, but not in a bad way. It was actually in quite a flattering way, but mainly by gay people. It’s nice to know that they appreciate me as a human being. I got stopped my a massive bear of a human in a club and he was like ‘Oh my god, I love your hair’ and I was like ‘oh thanks!’ and he was like ‘oh, and your face too’ and I was like oh so like the entire head? He was like, yeah shame you’re not gay. And I was like, how do you know I’m not gay? He was like, ‘oh are you gay?’ and I said no and ran away. I keep my body out of the limelight, so I’ve never felt objectified in a physical way because I’m too much of a prude. Not really. Perhaps because of the way I dress and the way I look. People say ‘nice shoes, twat.’ I think that women actually have the control in sexual situations. Biologically, males have always fought and shown off to get the females attention. They need to push their genes into the next generation and women decide whether or not that happens.
3
Yes. Definitely. I’ve been mostly patronized about my age, for being younger and feeling like there wasn’t that much regard to my feelings to it at the time. It was basically a suggestion that I should follow and, well, I didn’t want to follow it and the person making the suggestion seemed to play it off like I was insecure. Like ‘oh it was just a joke’, kind of thing. Like ‘oh it was weird of you to think that I wanted that in the first place’ kind of thing. It’s mostly manifested awkward situations. I suppose it’s just a method of communication. The hardest bit is saying no without offending the other person, sometimes. And sometimes they get offended. Even if it’s subconsciously they realize that.
Yeah, yeah, mostly when I’ve been minding my own business dancing around. I’ve had people just persist, persist, persist. Wanting me to, wanting to come into MY personal space. Them wanting to cross my barriers. Even when I say no it’s like they don’t believe it. Or maybe they just, I don’t know. I don’t know I do remember feeling a bit belittled. It’s really annoying to have someone say that your mind isn’t accurate. Do you know what I mean? Like if you say no, I don’t want to come back to yours or whatever to do this, they kind of, they challenge you on that and you therefore have to explain yourself. No should be enough. It objectifies, it’s like your treated like a computer like ‘oh this button doesn’t work so I’ll press all the other buttons that it potentially could be!’.
That’s coming from the gay community side of things, I’ve mostly only dealt with older gay men. But er, I’ve never had a woman do that to me no. No, no. Maybe if she was really drunk and just being silly. Sort of as a joke so it wasn’t as persistent, I guess I haven’t had women do that to me. I have women sort of suggest it, as flirting but not nearly as annoyingly as prowlers.
Yeah definitely, all the time. Every time I go out I am aware of what I’m wearing and how people will interpret and react to that. Actually even if I’m not, even if I am
4
Once in my life, I was in the club, I saw this guy staring at me, at the bar. Suddenly he comes up to me, saying that he finds me really beautiful and he would love to lock me in a glass coffin and stare at me for the rest of his life. Sometimes but I don’t mind. I would call myself a sexual threat. No I never felt like that. I never experienced that in my life. I’m not truly offended but I am not comfortable with that. I think it’s like a lack of manners. You don’t talk to a woman like that. It’s kind of disrespectful in a way. That’s what I think. It’s just like coming back to the route and behaving like a cave man. You can come over to a woman and say you’re beautiful, but you don’t have to like, whistle or scream or whatever. Usually when they whistle they don’t say your gorgeous but they want to say your gorgeous but they say it in a very rude way. Hey bitch, I like you. It’s really disrespectful. I remember in this huge avenue in Athens, like two cars stopping, like they were friends or something, in the middle of the avenue. And I wanted to just cross, they stopped their cars, both of them, and they were like ‘come on princess- cross the street’ and I was like ‘woah take it easy’
I hate when people call me princess. It depends how someone calls you princess.
It’s just that idea of you not being able to do anything apart from be good looking.
My dad always called me princess when I didn’t want to do stuff. ‘Hey Princess, maybe you would like to help me?’ something like that, I was always so angry.
5
No not really. Not from my family background which was quite liberal and I was always quite accepted. It never really stressed me and never really mattered to me, like the whole situation.
A night out? Yeah I would say that can happen. I have to say, yeah. Yeah, I sometimes have but it’s mainly like from other ethnic groups. Where there is a strict sexuality. Especially with homosexuality where its not expected. Then you have the whole group dynamic if it’s a closed group, especially if you come with your own group with your own friends. Not being educated, completely different background and culture.
Let me think, no. Actually not. I can’t really. I think that’s just… maybe it’s just like a gender question. A natural gender thing. Once you start talking with a lot of people they can accept it. Usually it’s something they really cant identify with themselves. If they can’t face it, they can change it. Maybe it’s a fear as well?
I think yeah that, you have like ‘sex sells’ everywhere. But the thing is, if you look back when my parents where younger, like my mother, it was kind of like, not normal, or my grandparents I think they, and now, I have to say I’m so used to that. Sit in a tube or walk through the street and see all like this kind of images, and I think you get so careless. Its not only with that, in London you have so many different cultures and people get careless, they see so muc that they blind everything out. A lot of issues I think. They don’t bother them any more and it gets normalized. And I think that’s the same with sex advertisement. Maybe they can do really controversial stuff but there’s a point where it’s actually not controversial anymore because everyone has seen it before. I think people see that as ok even if it’s not. Everybody has seen a porno movie before and its, ok, yeah, it gets so normal. People don’t question the things anymore.
You really judge people. But you just put them in a kind of box. If you see a woman in a tshirt and a short skirt and you can see everything, you sort of just put them in a slutty box. Without like, asking yourself how this person is actually. You just put them in a box. Because you see every weekend, every night, you see these people, even if it’s snowing, wearing nothing. And of course you ask, why is she doing that? What does she actually want because she knows. But then you think, you know whats going to happen when you kind of wear like a really short skirt.
I think people like it, otherwise they wont wear it. Often, maybe it’s a group pressure, and image of what is beautiful and what is not. In most cases its an image in your head of what looks good on you and what not. Often this image is influenced by just trends, celebrities, media based things.
I think media pushed it really strong, because eit is a huge business. The whole sex sells is a really huge business. It reaches our desire. People wanted to see that and then people picked on that and pushed it really really forward.
Yeah I do consider it. I have two smaller brotehrs I don’t see a lot these last two years and its so crazy. They do such different stuff to what we used to do. They already are 6 and 8 years younger than me and when I talk to them now I already feel likes theres such a huge generation gap, and I think that’s only going to grow in the future.
Pornography, when I was this age, this kind of, forbidden. Now everbody has a smart hone and a computer and can download this stuff everywhere. We didn’t have that, you could text but you couldn’t be online, like in my kind of circles when I grew up. Maybe I had a computer at home but I think that’s something that influenced them really quite a lot. At one point of course, its over done, and maybe it will go in another direction, but I think young people are really influenced already.
Yeah I think it will or already does. I think a lot of things get more superficial, especially in like, inter human relations. A good example is how you talk to somebody in a chat room. You don’t see the person, every word has a short name, you use short lol and stuff to express yourself and you limit yourself so much. I even get it with facebook, you just use short cuts to say something, it’s a message but, often you feel much freer, you can just say something, and then it’s out there. There is a reaction but you don’t have to face it. You don’t have to face the reaction. You don’t have to kind of feel responsible because its just a future world. They get like, more and more superficial and I mean it’s hard to make a prognosis on that, or maybe it just depends on the person and the age as well, once you get educated how it woks you become a believer you so you just believe whats out there and don’t question it anymore. People get stupid. In a relationship you lose so much if it is just on the surface.
6
Well, I’m not really sure, sometimes I think it’s hard to say. We live in a really erm male dominated society anyway I think, and I think that, like, due to the fact that we live in a such a male dominated society, being a male, you don’t really experience so much prejudice as maybe females do. I think there are certain situations where, you know, like, as a more sensitive man you might be objectified by a more dominant man you know, but whether this is sexual objectification or whether it’s just dominance, male dominance actually. Otherwise no, I don’t think so.
I think it is very different for women because the society we live in is mainly a male dominated society for years and the fact it remains a male dominated society is what gives the problem to women. Because women they have to shoulder this, they get totally disrespected. It’s a real shame actually I think It’s a total shame. Because actually I don’t think it was always like this. Male dominated society is only a thing which developed with the strength of weapons, the strength of people at war, this sort of forced strength if you like. They real strength still lies with the women (laughs).
I think it was created very much as a controlling method. A violent controlling method. A woman dominated society, if you look at woman as a being, women have a womb they have the ability to look after a child, they have a nurturing ability, a caring ability. I think men could feel very threatened by this. In many ways like, it makes men feel like they are not powerful. I think men developed war to show how powerful they are when actually it’s a show of their weakness.
I think an equal society can only come when there is a nurturing balance. There needs to be on both sides a sense of respect nuture and importance of one another. Which is think is a more natural feminine quality. I think in a female driven society that would come more into play.
Well for me it’s quite difficult because I grew up in a family with a sister and a mother I have always been quite conscious and respectful of women and felt that women are very are worth a lot of respect you know. I spent the first the first few moments of my life in the womb of y mothr. If my mother didn’t get birth to me I wouldn’t be here. With that in mind I think women deserve the upmost respect you know? I can’t understand men who don’t understand women actually as they all have mothers.
I think sexual objectification is when someone, whether its male or female, makes prejudices of the other person due completely to their sex whether they are male of female you know. That’s what I would judge it as.
If you look at marketing, it is something that is very sexual in nature. Male dominated, like most other things, like I said it’s a male dominated society. I think that is also why the female form plays such a role in modern marketing, because the female form is something that attracts other men of power, you know because its an object. They objectify the female form to make it sellable, because it IS sellable you know, because most men are attracted to that. That, there is something very wrong about that too because when you start to see the female as just a sexual object, you totally misunderstand the feminine power. It’s not in the Venus adverts you know! Female power is nothing to do with any kind of marketing technique which they might use in female orientated advertising. Female power is seeing women as mothers, as the source actually. The source. The source of life.
I’m negative about the way things are developing at the moment because you know, the male dominated society is very very strong at the moment, you can see that in politics, the way war is going round and round and round, marketing, you can even see it in the skyline! Look at the skyline, all the towers are representative of penises, its like all these business men are sticking their penises up in the air you know? In such a society it’s hard to imagine how it could turn around. I think it’s just the more people open up, open their eyes and recognize again what is the female, what actually is the female, they see they have a mother and without their mother they wouldn’t be here. It would be a revolution of sorts for men to let go of their power. Because power is an addictive thing. When you get some you want more you know?
7
Yes (laughs) yes. A lot of times actually. I have had a lot of men where I have felt like an object.
No but I often felt before I met max, when I got to knew someone it was often like men were interested in me until they had sex and then afterwards not anymore so I was reduced to the sexual thing. I had the feeling that I was the object and they had pushed their ego and when they got what they wanted they said ‘ok, next one’.
Yeah, I think so for sure, if you wear a short skirt and a low t-shirt for sure it provokes men. They are more interested, but they are interested in your body more than you. I think it is sad that women cannot dress like this without men getting you know, cannot control themselves. Men have to learn to control themselves and not reduce a woman because she is attractive and shows her body. Not to make them a sexual object.
Not in a relationship, more like in the behviour, like how men behave, they were only intereste duntil they had what they wanted. They didn’t say something but I could tell from their behavior. You understand what I mean?
You know what, actually, I remembered, this is a good example. Once I spoke with a guy I thought like having a relationship about a different woman. He is not interested to have, can’t imagine to have just one woman because he doesn’t eat every day the same pizza. This is one good example. He is an idiot.
I think its ok to use the female body but why always this perfect thin body, why do they always have to show the ‘perfect’ woman you know? So a lot of woman get complexes, they think, oh im not slim enough, not tall enough or whatever, not a nice skin, because we see in advertising something that is non realistic. They all look the same actually. Show women in their personality. Different kind of woman, not the same woman. Don’t reduce them to their sexuality. Not only women can make nice sex or nice breast or legs or whatever you know?
Yeah I think sex sells, because it is the strongest energy we have. It is the basic instinct that we all have. Behind everything. Yeah actually, it’s behind most of the things we do, this strong energy, this strong sexual energy is there. Desires and stuff. It’s there for good.
I wish that this, one day, will develop in another direction. That men learn to control this ego, their ego, control and can accept woman as a strong part, men can accept women are strong people and that women also see themselves as strong beings.
I think there are some women who do this also but it’s much less, really much less. Something else. For women it’s more of an emotional thing, a uniting men where for men it’s like animals trying to spread their sperm. No really you know! They really identify with this animalistic instinct. To spread his sperm to as many women as possible. They are caring and more emotional. Sexuality of woman, a man enters a woman and the woman gets the man in her.
Women On The Market Images
A photo I took at The Smithfield Meat Market:
The work of Vanessa Beecroft VB47
Tight Sculptures by Sarah Lucas
Sketch of how I imagine the performance to look like:
Costume I created out of tights and cling film:
Women On The Market
For Unit 1, I created a performance proposal to take place at Smithfield Meat Market. The performance was inspired by Luce Irigaray's essay 'Women on The Market" Below is an extract from an essay I wrote about developing my practice, and a little bit about the proposal:
I have always been fascinated by and passionate about equality between the sexes, and Luce Irigaray’s writing is a great starting point to begin developing a deeper understanding of feminism. I discovered her writing soon after visiting Smithfield’s Meat Market[i], and this helped inform my performance proposal outcome for Unit One. Whilst at the market, I was subjected to some verbal sexist slurs by a few of the local vendors. This lead me to think about how Western Culture still has a way to go before true equality can be reached. I began thinking about the objectification of women, the way in which they are often presented in the media as sexual tools created to titillate men. I thought about the recent focus in popular culture of the VMA performance by Miley Cyrus and Robin Thicke[ii] [iii]. I read numerous articles and comments on the Internet in response to this performance that demeaned Cyrus for her ‘offensive’[iv] dance moves and revealing costume. What really disturbed and shocked me about these remarks, was the distinct lack of condemnation for her partner Thicke and the song which they performed, entitled ‘Blurred Lines’[v] which questions consensual sex and propagates rape culture. It seems to me that there are serious double standards that are deeply embedded into our society, and that these need to be deconstructed and exposed. I read Luce Irigaray’s essay ‘Women on the Market’[vi], which divides women into three categories, that of the mother, the virgin and the prostitute, and using Karl Marx’s theory of capital and commodities, explores the way in which women are circulated and exchanged exclusively between men. Irigaray writes ‘the circulation of women among men is what establishes the operations of society, at least of patriarchal society’[vii]. She also notes that ‘the society we know, our own culture, is based upon the exchange of women’[viii]. This essay enraged and inspired me. The realisation that women in my own culture are treated as useful commodities for the phallic economy is totally unethical and unjust. Mutual respect and understanding between the sexes is crucial to reaching true equality. Therefore, with this essay in mind, I decided to explore how I can draw attention to this issue through performance. As Perry mentioned, art can be seen as meaning making, and so I wanted to create a piece that would encourage an audience to engage with an issue that truly needs addressing.
I looked at the work of Sarah Lucas[ix], Vanessa Beecroft[x] and Orlan[xi]. I was particularly drawn to Lucas’ tights sculptures, which uses stuffed flesh coloured tights to create distorted female figures. The humor in her work and the bold statements they make about modern sexuality really inspired me. When looking into the work of Vanessa Beecroft, I was interested in the way in which she exploited her performers in order to make a point about exploitation. I find the ethics of her work questionable, and although I find the final outcomes powerful to behold, I am as of yet undecided as to how I really feel about her practice. I would like to explore the issues of her work further, as I think the relationship between the performers and the creator of the piece is incredibly important. I was particularly inspired the use of masks in VB47, which for me raised questions about the way in which women’s individual identities are regarded by patriarchal society.
Whilst looking at the work of Orlan, I found this quotation from her; ‘everything takes a different flavor when a woman does it’[xii]. I think that this is an interesting quotation to explore and reflect on as I progress in my practice. Is it true? If it is then how will this affect the reception and meaning of my work.
[i] http://www.smithfieldmarket.com
[ii] BBC News Website coverage of the story: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-23847366 (Note how not a single comment is made about Thicke’s part in the performance, or the lyrical content of the song)
[iii] Footage of the VMA performance as broadcast on TV http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TSPybJjPdE
[iv] See vi above for BBC News Website Article, and read comments section on the Youtube video cited in vii.
[v] Lyrics to ‘Blurred Lines’ http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/robinthicke/blurredlines.html
[vi] Luce Irigaray, Women on the Market (page 170), an essay found in The Sex Which is Not One, Translated by Catherine Porter, (1985) Cornell University Press, New York. Originally published in French under the title Ce Sexe qui n’en est pas un (1977) by Editions de Minuit
[vii] Page 184, Luce Irigaray, The Sex Which is Not One, Translated by Catherine Porter, (1985) Cornell University Press, New York. Originally published in French under the title Ce Sexe qui n’en est pas un (1977) by Editions de Minuit
[viii] Page 170, Luce Irigaray, The Sex Which is Not One, Translated by Catherine Porter, (1985) Cornell University Press, New York. Originally published in French under the title Ce Sexe qui n’en est pas un (1977) by Editions de Minuit
[ix] I saw Lucas’s work at The Whitechapel Gallery
[x] Link to Vanessa Beecroft’s website http://www.vanessabeecroft.com I was particularly inspired by VB61, VB55, VB47
[xi] Link to Orlan’s Website http://www.orlan.eu
[xii] Final sentence in this article by Stuart Jeffries for the Gaurdian Online Orlan’s Art of Sex and Surgery Published Wednesday 1st July 2009 http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2009/jul/01/orlan-performance-artist-carnal-art
I carried a lot of inspiration from this Unit 1 project into our Unit 3 performance.
Becoming A Mannequin
We booked out the photography studios and set about turning me into a human mannequin, using talcum powder and a swimming cap to make my body appear like that of a life size doll. The process was long, cold and miserable. Standing naked before a camera, being manipulated into different positions, controlled and seen solely as an object is not a pleasant experience. The worst thing about this experience was that the photos got lost during the shoot and so we had to start over, this time slowly removing the album powder with cold damp clothes. Tape was then ripped off of my nipples and from around my throat. I was bare and cold and shaking. It transpired that after this whole process, not a single photo was salvaged. The whole process had left us with no evidence, no documentation, only what the three of us had experienced in the moment. The experience reminded me somewhat of a scene from Harun Farocki's 1983 film 'An Image' in which a naked female model is photographed for a shoot for Playboy, and is subject to verbal abuse about her appearance and is contorted into uncomfortable positions as if she were a piece of meat. Below is a still from this scene:
The Life and Works of Jake & Dinos Chapman
The use of mannequins in their work really interests me, I was particularly struck by their piece 'Great Deeds Against the Dead'.
I took these photos of the mannequins torso, exploring how lighting can affect the qualities of an object, sometimes making it appear animate. I think the shots with the black back ground look like images from back stage at a catwalk show. The highly exposed photo makes the mannequin appear like a futuristic alien type barbie doll. I like the clean, cold almost other worldly aesthetic of this image.
The opening sequence to the TV program 'Nip/Tuck' was very inspiring for us as we explored how to make the human body appear to be like a mannequin or how to make the mannequin appear like a live human being.
Performance 1
Our initial performance idea was to create an installation with two mannequins, one representing a highly sexualised image of a woman and one presenting a very modest conservative woman. This would be created by projecting squares of these images onto the mannequins in a whit space, so the audience would see a snippet of a breast of a part of the face, and slowly this images would merge so that that mannequins had both the conservative and the sexualised images projected on to them. Over the top of this, two speakers would play two voices which would read out texts debating sexual objectification and prejudices made towards women. Below is a piece of text I wrote, for a character who is passionate about feminism and sexual liberation and condemnation for the abuse of women in the media. Avra wrote a speech which opposed this, and what was interesting to me was the grey areas of cross over where sometimes the characters had similar ideas.
This is the piece of text I wrote:
The sexual objectification of women in the media has to reach an end. My body is not the purpose of my being. I am not a piece of meat to be brought an sold to titilate men and feed their phallic economy. I am human, and I posses all the complexities that we share. The modern media is full of degrading imagery and misogynistic ideas. One only needs to flick through a magazine or watch a music channel to be inundated with highly sexualised and submissive images of women. Take the Dolce and Gabbana 'gang rape' advert, which sees a scantily clad woman being pinned to the ground with a look of distress on her face whilst a gang of wildly masculine men watch on and constrain her. There is an idea that 'sex sells'. Sexual images tap into the carnal, primitive 'let's reproduce let's reproduce' parts of our brains. But why has sex become about violence, dominance and humiliation? If sex sells, why do 87% of sexually objectifying adds only feature women? Surely advertisers would do better if they had a larger variety of models, rather than white, impossibly thin females. These are not representative of consumers and ostracises women, giving them complexes and insecurities. Surely it would be better still to create a retail economy which does not rely on sexual objectification, but on the strength of the products they are pushing. The reality is, there is a deep rooted issue running through western culture which encourages destructive behaviour in all genders. Little boys are brought up to 'be a man' and to never show 'weakness'. They are judged by their physical strength and the length of their penis. This embeds ego complexes in their minds. Therefore there is a constant drive and desire to prove their worth, prove their masculinity, and one of the ways in which this can be achieved is by subjugating women. Where does this phallic economy come from? Where did it originate? Well, let's look at it this way. Men and women are different. They are! Yes we are all human and therefore deserve the same rights as one another, regardless or gender, race, social status etc. but there are intrinsic differences. One of the main differences are that women can bear children. Without women their would be no future. Men are obviously equally required for this, but women are the ones who can carry the future, nurture it and bring it into the world. On top of that, despite not being (generally) as physically strong as men, women and men can achieve the same things. So where does this leave men? These women can bear children, raise them, cook for then, educate them, make homes for them, provide for them. Men are left with nothing but boredom and fear of not being man enough. Therefore, these poor men, rendered useless by their childbearing partners, procrastinate, and give themselves issues to think about. They create politics, wars, religions, and money. They create problems and debates to keep eachother busy, to massage their egos and prove their worth. Women don't have time for that. They've got important shit to get on with. So men created money, power, politics, and this just caused them to stress out a hell of a lot more. Guy X has more money than Guy Y, oh god! Oh no! That means he is a more successful man than me. Maybe everyone will think I have a small dick! Ok well, what can I do to make some more money? Who can I blame for this? You know what, I'm envious of my woman, she's got it easy, she just goes about her business and raises the kids awesomely. I'll just take it out on her. That makes sense. If I humiliate her and show everyone she's mine, my property, then maybe THEN they will take me seriously. I'll have some power! Good, great! So guy X makes woman Y his object, his possession. Domesticate, suppress, dominate, contain, trap, expose, dehumanise, destroy.
This is a sketch of how I imagine the performance to look:
The Mannequin
After our exploration of Oxford Street's presentation of women, we became interested in working with mannequins. Mannequins can be seen as a symbol of women as commodities to be brought and sold. Their form is that of a 'perfect' ideal for a woman's body, on which clothes can be displayed for purchase. The image of a mannequin is immediately associated with retail and perfection. We began to look into how to procure mannequins, as we thought that it would be interesting to explore using some in our performance. It turns out they are crazy expensive, sometimes going up to £3000! So we borrowed one from a friend, and before that Avra drew some sketches using her computer. We wanted to play with projection on the mannequin, to explore two opposing ideas on the way in which women present themselves and how people perceive them for that.
Article on American Apparel's 'mufftastic' mannequin: http://newsfeed.time.com/2014/01/17/american-apparels-mannequin-pubic-hair-more-stunt-than-statement/
Fashion is always more ambiguous... can you distinguish between art and pornography?