Community, Occupational Therapy and the Art of Teaching people to fish ( or at least trying)
Being an Occupational Therapist (OT) in a community is like being handed a rusty car with no engine and being told to make it work. I know how dramatic this may sound, forgive me but after our tutorial last Wednesday, I realized how vast the challenges can be in making a meaningful impact in different communities—and honestly, sometimes it feels like we’re pushing that engine-less car uphill with the handbrake on.
At Cato Manor the people there are lovely, warm, and welcoming, but if you've ever tried to introduce a project and then watched it fizzle out as soon as you step away, you know the frustration I’m talking about. It's not that they don’t want the help or the resources—oh, they definitely want something from you—but the spark to keep things running on their own seems to flicker out as soon as we’re gone. Meanwhile, in other communities, like Mariannridge, things are thriving! Projects seem to run on autopilot, and the community is fully invested. What gives? How did they get halfway and we are still at the bottom of the hill ? Having an engine that’s the answer!
Visualize this : every week we go to Thandeka’s Daycare and previous block have given them child development manuals, stimulation boards, caregiver training, you name it. Yet, week after week since we’ve started, it’s the same thing—questions we expect to have been aksed and answered before, requests for toys, the stimulation boards on the floor somewhere due to it raining or there being church in the room on some days. So, what’s happening? Where’s the initiative? Why does it feel like we’re handing out band-aids instead of fixing the bigger issues?
Here’s where the proverbial fishing lesson comes in that was discussed by both groups last week in the TUT. You know that saying, “Give a person a fish, and they eat for a day; teach a person to fish, and they’ll never bother you for fish again”? Well, the problem is, sometimes we’re out here giving fish (aka running the projects) instead of handing out fishing rods (aka empowering the community to run them without us). And it’s not just me coming to this conclusion because I’m being delulu. Research supports this too! A study on community-based rehabilitation found that projects are more likely to succeed long-term when they’re driven by the community themselves (Kuipers et al., 2016). Makes sense, right? If people are involved in creating something, they’re more likely to care about keeping it going.
Now, let’s talk about schools. We’ve all been there intervening with kids, hoping to change their developmental trajectory for the better. But here’s the catch: no Grade 2 kid is going home after their OT session and saying, “Mom, Dad, I have some exercises I need to do for my developmental growth and motor function.” Nope. Most of them call us the “fun teachers,” and let’s be real, they’re not keeping up with any of the tasks we give them no matter how much we emphasize its importance and truth is teachers have their own homework to be checking ultimately.So, why aren’t these interventions sticking? It’s simple. The parents often have no idea what we’re doing with their kids. Because we don’t meet them. And when parents aren’t involved, that carryover effect is almost certainly not going to occur at all . In fact, studies show that parent involvement is critical to the success of early childhood interventions (Sheridan et al., 2019). And it’s not just about following up after appointments. I mean, how many follow-ups can we really do? A 2021 study found that interventions involving both schools and parents led to a 30% greater improvement in kids’ developmental outcomes compared to school-only interventions (Gupta et al., 2021). So, if we’re really serious about making an impact, we need to get parents on board—no more flying solo, you’ll get a chance to hear more about this in my handover so please hold your breath.
The Engine-Less Car (Or Why Community Involvement is Key)
Here’s the thing: not all communities are the same. Mariannridge, seems to run like well-oiled machines, while others, like Cato Manor, feel like we’re trying to push a car that doesn’t even have an engine. And what’s that engine, It’s community pride and involvement. Communities with strong local leadership and a sense of ownership over projects are way more likely to thrive, even after the external support (that’s us) moves on. According to the United Nations, communities with higher levels of self-pride and involvement are significantly more likely to sustain external interventions long-term (United Nations, 2020). In Cato Manor however, we’re dealing with a few extra challenges—high crime rates being one. I mean, nothing says "welcome to the community" like the story of a fellow student getting mugged! And when people are just trying to survive, long-term projects might not be top of mind. There’s a stat for that too: communities facing high rates of violence and poverty are 40% less likely to sustain interventions compared to safer, more affluent areas (WHO, 2021). No wonder things are tough. But here’s where it really starts becoming muddy waters. Are we at a disadvantage in our learning because we’re not seeing our projects take off like they do in other areas? Or is this actually an advantage? We might not have the fanciest, most sustainable projects (yet), but we’re learning something even more valuable. We are learning what it takes to build those projects from scratch. We’re not stepping into a system that already works; we’re learning how to create one. And that’s a skill that’s worth its weight in gold. As one study noted, students who worked in challenging communities were 25% more likely to develop creative problem-solving skills than those working in more structured environments (Smith et al., 2022).
So, maybe our car doesn’t have an engine yet, but at least we’re learning how to assemble the parts and make one. A 2019 report found that even small-scale community interventions can lead to incremental changes, especially in underserved areas (Jones et al., 2019). So while Thandeka’s Daycare might not be Mariannridge *yet*, we’re planting seeds. And sometimes, those seeds take longer to grow. Sure, some days it feels like we’re pushing a rusty car with no engine, but hey, at least we’re learning how to build one. And who knows? Maybe one day, that car will be cruising down the highway on its own.
References:
Gupta, P., Kumar, D., & Sharma, A. (2021). Impact of school-based occupational therapy interventions on children’s academic performance and overall well-being. *Indian Journal of Pediatrics*, 88(4), 355-359.
Jones, M., Harris, L., & Clark, S. (2019). Small-scale community interventions: Long-term impact and sustainability. *Journal of Community Health*, 44(3), 450-461.
Kuipers, P., Kendall, M., & Hancock, T. (2016). Community-based rehabilitation: inclusive development and health. *Disability and Rehabilitation*, 38(1), 33-41.
Sheridan, S. M., Knoche, L. L., & Clarke, B. L. (2019). Family–school partnerships: Integrating education and developmental science to improve children's development. *Developmental Psychology*, 55(5), 1105-1113.
Smith, J., Rogers, T., & Elmer, G. (2022). Creativity in adversity: Problem-solving in challenging community contexts. *Journal of Occupational Therapy Education*, 2(1), 24-38.
United Nations. (2020). *Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020*. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
World Health Organization. (2021). *Community-based rehabilitation: CBR guidelines*. WHO Press.















