Page 5
The coupons on Neptune.shop could be used at the Westridge store and at independent retailers that sell Neptune candy and accept those coupons.
No title available

★

JVL

Discoholic 🪩
Claire Keane

@theartofmadeline
No title available

if i look back, i am lost
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

tannertan36

izzy's playlists!
sheepfilms

titsay

shark vs the universe
Peter Solarz
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
No title available

No title available

roma★
🪼
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia

seen from Italy
seen from United States

seen from Pakistan

seen from Japan

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Singapore

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Türkiye

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Germany

seen from United States
@pointsforharley-blog
Page 5
The coupons on Neptune.shop could be used at the Westridge store and at independent retailers that sell Neptune candy and accept those coupons.
Page 5
Albert never called Neptune's customer service line.
Page 27
The concurrence said that Neptune argued that courts should not apply Title III to websites absent DOJ regulations but rejected that argument.
Page 21
The Thirteenth Circuit noted and rejected Neptune's argument that summary judgement was proper because Albert did not introduce evidence that any aspect of its website specifically linked to the Westridge store was inaccessible.
Page 23
The Thirteenth Circuit discusses Neptune's customer service line but states that it is a way to treat individuals with disabilities differently from individuals without disabilities.
Page 5
Albert was able to use her screen reader to access the address of the store, directions to the store, and the list of upcoming in-store events.
Page 16
The Thirteenth Circuit says that Neptune moved for summary judgement after discovery.
Page 29
The second question in the Order Granting Certiorari asks whether Title III of the ADA applies "to a website that has a nexus to a store that is a 'place of public accommodation.'"
Page 4
The Products page on Neptune.shop does not identify the products that are currently in stock at the Westridge store.
Page 10
Judge Harlan states that, "striving for accessibility without a clear standard is a losing battle."
Page 6
Ms. Albert sought a permanent injunction requiring Neptune.shop to "comply with Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0."
Page 17
The Thirteenth Circuit says its standard of review was de novo in reviewing the district court's grant of summary judgement.
Page 3
Approximately five percent of Neptune's annual revenue comes from the Westridge store.
Page 3
Albert has visited the Westridge store "at least four times."
Page 10
According to the district court, "the absence of clear standards, coupled with the fact that the ADA provides for payment of attorney's fees" has led to an increase in lawsuits "even among businesses who have made significant attempts at accessibility," in jurisdictions that have expanded the reach of Title III to allow suits due to inaccessible websites."
Pages 27-28
The concurrence gives these two reasons for criticizing the nexus approach the Thirteenth Circuit adopts: it has the perverse effect of leaving unregulated the websites where access is most critical, and it is in tension with the Supreme Court's Wayfair opinion.
Pages 17, 19
Two block quotes appear in the Thirteenth Circuit's opinion: a block quote from the ADA on what constitutes discrimination and one from a law review article advocating for the nexus doctrine.