The Impacts of the Alberta Oil Sands on Indigenous Subsistence Practices and Inflicted Cultural Harms
IntroductionÂ
Northern Alberta has a number of Indigenous communities, consisting of Cree, Dene and MĂ©tis peoples. These communities are increasingly impacted by the expansion of and extraction from the Alberta oil sands within their traditional territories (Baker & Westman, 2018). First Nations in northern Alberta have Treaty rights, and part of these include the right to practice traditional subsistence activities, including hunting, trapping, fishing, and gathering (Westman & Joly, 2019). These Treaty rights are affirmed in s. 35 of the Constitution (Baker, 2018) and MĂ©tis rights, as Aboriginal people, are also Constitutionally protected (Westman & Joly, 2019). Yet many people from Indigenous communities in northern Alberta have argued that their ability to practice their rights to subsistence are being infringed upon by the oil sands industry through the loss of land and resources to industrial activities and through the contamination of wild foods and medicines by the oil sands industrial processes (Baker, 2018; Westman & Joly, 2019). This is significant, considering Bakerâs (2018) ethnographic work, with the people from Chipewyan Lake, found that the majority of the community continue and prefer to eat wild foods, with some Elders having only consumed wild meat their entire lives. While the majority of research that examines the effects of the oil sands on Indigenous subsistence practices and wellbeing addresses access to land and resources and effects of pollutants on animals, plants, earth, air, and water, there is a deficiency of research which addresses the significant cultural harms caused when culturally significant foods and medicines are perceived to be unsafe due to the risk of contamination by the oil sands.Â
Figure 1Â Moose: An important source of wild meat
(Hagerty, n.d.)
Figure 2Â Low bush cranberry: An important food and medicine
(RĂžnning, 2009)
Impact: Decreased Access to Land
Figure 3Â Alberta oil sands mining map
(NormanEistein, 2006)
One way I believe the oil sands are impacting Indigenous subsistence practices is by physically occupying and expanding onto large tracts of land within their traditional territories. The oil sands have been named âthe most destructive project on Earth,â with over 370 km2 of land strip-mined (Willow, 2016) and with toxic tailing ponds covering over 50 km2, which are visible from space (Huseman & Short, 2012).Â
 Companies falsely conclude that the destruction of one particular habitat will not have a significant impact on traditional land users because there are other similar habitats within the Nationâs traditional territory. They fail to understand that certain familial groups hold harvesting rights to specific areas and when a family loses an area to development the entire family lineage loses rights and connection to that place. Oil sand companies also argue that the land can be restored, âreclaimedâ, and even improved. Companies have self-reported the reclamation of 65 km2, yet the Alberta Government has only certified 0.15% of oil sand land as reclaimed. Of this reclaimed land, it is no longer the same, with stunted trees and no successful restoration of peatland (Baker & Westman, 2018). Also, Indigenous beliefs about extraction of oil from land are not taken into consideration, where a number of people Baker and Westman (2018) spoke with have stated that the land is no longer the same once it has changed, where it has âlost its spirit and is considered contaminated and untrustworthyâ (p. 151). The extraction/ exploitation by oil companies is also seen as breaking the cycles of reciprocity humans have with the land and nonhumans (a form of negative reciprocity) (Baker, 2018).
 Furthermore, access to traditional land and resources has become increasingly challenging due to decreasing water levels in rivers, lakes and wetlands, caused by the water uptake necessary for oil sands extraction (Westman & Joly, 2019). Oil sands extraction requires three barrels of water to one barrel of oil, which is significantly more water needed than for the extraction of conventional oil (Huseman & Short, 2012). Waterways are how Indigenous Peoples access much of the land for subsistence in northern Alberta, and the dropping levels have made navigation more challenging and certain areas inaccessible by boat (Westman & Joly, 2019).
Impact: Contamination
Another way I think the oil sands are negatively impacting traditional subsistence practices is because people fear that water and air, as well as wild foods and medicines, have been contaminated by industrial processes, and so they perceive water, foods and medicines as unsafe to consume. Indigenous community members have observed changes to the water and air quality since oil industry development. Elder Elsie Fabian, who lives along the Athabasca River, described how the air is bad now, the water is brown when it used to be blue, and now no one can fish or drink from it (Huseman & Short, 2012). Fort McKay First Nations have frequently complained of the smell of sulphur and ammonia in the air (Westman & Joly, 2019). Ethnographic work has also revealed that community members from Bigstone Cree Nation and Fort McKay have observed changes in the animals and plants, including moose that are green inside and that have cysts and/or many parasites; fish with ulcers, growths, and/or deformed faces; beavers also green inside and with thin fur; birds covered in oil; and important food and medicine plants, such as berries and mint, dried up and dusty, and being perceived to have lost their medicinal power (Baker, 2018). Elders have often expressed concern for the wellbeing of these medicinal plants, recognizing them as âa portal to the spirit world and healingâ (Baker & Westman, 2018, p. 151). As well, Elder Albert Yellowknee of Bigstone Cree Nation talked about the significance of this contamination on culture, where âwhen you kill the land, you contaminate culture, language, spirit of the people. When you lose both, itâs completely goneâ (Baker, 2018, p. 39).Â
This perception of contamination is backed by evidence from scientific research and literature. Studies have shown that the oil sand industryâs extraction and processing releases carcinogens and other toxic pollutants (i.e., polycyclic aromatic compounds & heavy metals) in the ground, water and atmosphere, which are harmful to the ecosystem. The toxins from leaking tailing ponds have been linked to increased hormone levels and tumor growth in fish. The odours of sulphur and ammonia, in communities close to oil sand sites, have been found in the air exceeding odour and health thresholds defined by the government, and carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic compounds and aerosol emissions have been detected in the air from evaporating tailing ponds and upgrading facilities (Westman & Joly, 2019).Â
Figure 4Â Contamination by oil sands industrial activities
(Howl Art Collective, 2008)
Conclusion
It is because of the significant expansion of the oil sands resulting in limited access to land, which contain foods and medicines, and also because the foods and medicines people are able to access are often perceived to be unsafe to consume due to contamination, that I believe that the Alberta oil sands are having serious consequences for Indigenous traditional subsistence practices and are causing detrimental cultural harm to the Indigenous nations who live on their traditional territories which contain these oil sands. Some implications of these impacts may be that communities who have traditionally relied on wild foods might end up choosing to eat western foods because they are perceived to be safer, yet a shift to a western diet has been linked to an increased risk of high blood pressure, CVD, diabetes, and obesity (National Collaborative Centre for Aboriginal Health, 2012). Furthermore, Indigenous Peoples who no longer have access to their traditional land to hunt, fish, gather, and to visit important cultural and spiritual places, may not be able to maintain and transmit important traditional knowledge to the next generation (Westman & Joly, 2019), which may jeopardize their self-determination, language, and cultural identity (Huseman & Short, 2012). As Albert says âwhen you destroy the berry patch, you destroy the roots of the four-leggeds [animals], birds, culture and peopleâ (Baker, 2018, p. 40). In the future, I think more research needs to be done examining this topic, as I only found one dissertation with ethnographic work about this specific topic by Janelle Baker. I think it would be particularly valuable if research examined Dene and MĂ©tis peopleâs experiences of the impacts of the Alberta oil sands, where the research thus far has focused mainly on Cree communitiesâ experiences.
References
Baker, J. M. (2018). Eating in the oil sands: sĂąkawiyiniwak (Northern Bush Cree) experiences with wild food contamination in Albertaâs oil sands (Doctoral thesis, McGill University, MontrĂ©al, QuĂ©bec). https://escholarship.mcgill.ca/concern/theses/qv33rz827
Baker, J. M., & Westman, C. N. (2018). Extracting knowledge: Social science, environmental impact assessment, and Indigenous consultation in the oil sands of Alberta, Canada. The Extractive Industries and Society, 5(1), 144 -153. doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2017.12.008
Huseman, J. & Short, D. (2012). âA slow industrial genocideâ: Tar sands and the Indigenous Peoples of northern Alberta. The International Journal of Human Rights, 16(1), 216-237. dx.doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2011.649593
National Collaborative Centre for Aboriginal Health. (2012). State of knowledge of Aboriginal health: A review of Aboriginal public health in Canada . https://www.nccih.ca/495/State_of_knowledge_of_Aboriginal_health__A_review_of_Aboriginal_public_health_in_Canada.nccih?id=52Â
Westman, C. N, & Joly, T. L. (2019). Oil sands extraction in Alberta, Canada: A review of impacts and processes concerning Indigenous Peoples. Human Ecology, 47(2), 233-243. doi.org/10.1007/s10745-019-0059-6
Willow, A. J. (2016). Indigenous extrACTIVISM in boreal Canada: Colonial legacies, contemporary struggle and sovereign futures. Humanities (Basel), 5(3), 55. doi:10.3390/h5030055
Images
Hagerty, R. (n.d.). A bull moose animal mammal [Photograph]. Wikimedia Commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:A_bull_moose_animal_mammal.jpg
Howl Art Collective. (2008). Tar sands in Alberta 2008 [Photograph] .Wikimedia Commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tar_sands_in_alberta_2008.jpg
NormanEistein. (2006). Athabasca oil sand mining map [Digital image Wikimedia Commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Athabasca_Oil_Sands_map.png
RĂžnning, A. (2009). Vaccinium vitis-idaea 09 [Photograph]. Wikimedia Commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vaccinium_vitis-idaea_09.JPG













