Meeseeks Doctor
Kudos to polygon for making me realize how much doctor House has in common with a meeseeks:
https://www.polygon.com/tv/2017/9/25/16361150/rick-and-morty-season-3-episode-9-review-beth

shark vs the universe
taylor price
Cosimo Galluzzi

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
ojovivo

tannertan36
d e v o n

roma★
Today's Document
YOU ARE THE REASON
Sweet Seals For You, Always

bliss lane
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!

izzy's playlists!
tumblr dot com
No title available

oozey mess
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
sheepfilms

if i look back, i am lost

seen from United States

seen from Netherlands
seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia

seen from Canada
seen from Colombia

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Japan
seen from United States
seen from Vietnam
seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from Portugal
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from Uruguay
@rickandmortyandphilosophy
Meeseeks Doctor
Kudos to polygon for making me realize how much doctor House has in common with a meeseeks:
https://www.polygon.com/tv/2017/9/25/16361150/rick-and-morty-season-3-episode-9-review-beth
Traditionalism
“Almost always the men who achieve these fundamental inventions of a new paradigm have been either very young or very new to the field whose paradigm they change. And perhaps that point need not have been made explicit, for obviously these are the men who, being little committed by prior practice to the traditional rules of normal science, are particularly likely to see that those rules no longer define a playable game and to conceive another set that can replace them.” ― Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
No gods but men
Philosophy of the Multiverse
In my favorite episode, Rick and Morty “cronenberg” their entire planet, dooming everyone on it to become hideously deformed monsters. Faced with such a dire outcome, the show’s protagonists have no choice but to become post-apocalyptic scavengers constantly on the run. Except for Rick and Morty that is. They, unlike the rest of the Smith clan, have access to multiverse technology. What do you do when you’re a scientific genius who’s corrupted the whole world beyond recognition? Easy! Break out that portal gun and find a new Earth to live on.
Ah but what new Earth do you choose? Again that’s easy. You pick one where the world-altering cronernberg virus is contained, but also one in which your alternate self dies shortly thereafter. As Rick says of his choice, “We’re not skipping a beat Morty”.
Still, knowing that there are practically infinite versions of himself did not help Morty to calm down after seeing his alternate body in a bloody heap crumpled in the corner of the garage. The existence of nearly uncountable alternate Earths didn’t sooth Morty’s conscience at having destroyed his last planet. Upon seeing his lifeless corpse staring at him, Morty exclaims “what about the reality we left behind?!” . Rick, the veteran of inter-dimensional travel provides the only sufficient response. “What about the reality where Hitler cured cancer Morty. The answer is don’t think about it.”
The genius of Rick and Morty is that it is able to distill this profound nihilism, the only reasonable consequence of of multiverse theory, in about 60 seconds of screen time. I mean, what other show or piece of culture forces us to confront the strange, absurd, meaninglessness of existence outside of R+M? Albert Camus’ the Stranger made manifest absurdism. Sartre’s plays showed us the basis of his existentialism. Rick and Morty does just as much. Week in and week out it helps us to laugh and cry at the fact that existence is so staggering, so large and strange that we are less than flies to the gods. For if we lived in a reality governed by the many worlds interpretation of quantium physics ( and most physics as well as this humble blogger believe that we do), then a whole host of philosophical problems arise.
Rick and Morty go back to this well often. In one episode, Rick mentions “my access to infinite timelines precludes the necessity of attachment”. Here, Rick states one of many implications of the multiverse. Why care about any specific world if so many exist, especially if you can choose between them.
Another philosophical dilemma posed by this sort of reality is that of death. Even if you die in one timeline, there are many, many, many others where you did not. This may be part of the reason why so many Reddit posters are hoping they bring krombopulos Michael back soon. Though the idea that some version of all of us and our loved ones live on in other worlds may be comforting, it also raises some mind blowing philosophical thought experiments. Google “quantum immortality” for an example.
Finally, the idea that there are as many worlds as there are possibilities challenges the concept of free will. What do our choices mean if everything that can happen does happen? If we live in a version of the world where we chose to be a devoted family man like Jerry Smith, how would we feel if we saw a different timeline where we instead became a famous actor snorting coke off Kristen Stewart? The better question might be, how would we feel if we saw other real worlds that were so vastly different from ours that they defied all of our imagination. In the reality where hitler cured cancer, does death, free will, or morality even mean a damn thing?
Note: Dan Harmon does love to use hitler to illustrate this last point. See this clip of him talking about “peak hitler” or a universe in which an exxon-mobile like corporation extracts energy from the many hitlers of the multiverse.
Note++: See this primer on why there really are man, many, many, many worlds https://www.hedweb.com/manworld.htm
God is Dead
Morty Jr:
“My life has been a lie! God is dead, the government is lame, Thanksgiving’s about killing Indians, Jesus wasn’t born on Christmas; it was a pagan holiday”
Nietzsche:
God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?
Moral Nihilism II
http://www.philosophybasics.com/branch_moral_nihilism.html
Moral Nihilism
“Judgments, judgments of value, concerning life, for it or against it, can, in the end, never be true: they have value only as symptoms, they are worthy of consideration only as symptoms; in themselves such judgments are stupidities.
— Nietzsche, Twilight of the Idols
“I'm very discreet. I have no code of ethics. I will kill anyone, anywhere. Children, animals, old people, doesn't matter. I just love killing”
- Krombopulos Michael
Hello my name is Danny Austin Grayson and I'm the founder of the church of Schwiftology we recently launched our church and blew up. I really enjoy your Tumblr page and see you have a eye for philosophy. Would you be interested working with us.
Hey just saw this (I don’t usually catch the DMs in the mobile app). Sure I’d be happy to help. What’s the plan Stan?
Pascal’s Wager
They say there are no athiests in the foxhole and French philosopher Blaise Pascal gives us good reason for this. Even if we are 99.999999% certain that there is no God, the rewards for believing in Him are too great to ignore. If a benevolent God could spare your life or else give you eternal life, wouldn’t it be worth at least considering an appeal to Him. Even if the probability that He existed was 1 in a million, wouldn’t it be worth praying. When faced with certain death, even a genius like Rick Sanchez agrees.
“But there is an eternity of life and happiness. And this being so, if there were an infinity of chances, of which one only would be for you, you would still be right in wagering one to win two, and you would act stupidly, being obliged to play, by refusing to stake one life against three at a game in which out of an infinity of chances there is one for you, if there were an infinity of an infinitely happy life to gain. But there is here an infinity of an infinitely happy life to gain, a chance of gain against a finite number of chances of loss, and what you stake is finite. It is all divided; wherever the infinite is and there is not an infinity of chances of loss against that of gain, there is no time to hesitate, you must give all...”
- Blaise Pascal
Atheism
“Is man merely a mistake of God's? Or God merely a mistake of man?” ― Friedrich Nietzsche
see also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_atheist_philosophers
Nihilism
See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Thacker
“A nihilist is a man who judges of the world as it is that it ought not to be, and of the world as it ought to be that it does not exist. According to this view, our existence (action, suffering, willing, feeling) has no meaning: the pathos of 'in vain' is the nihilists' pathos — at the same time, as pathos, an inconsistency on the part of the nihilists.”
— Friedrich Nietzsche,
translated: come watch TV
MetaphysRicks Part 1
Much like our own, the Rick and Morty universe can be cold, indifferent and unintelligible. At times, it can also be deceiving. In those cases, Rick and Morty asks the first question of philosophy. How do we know what’s real and what isn’t?
Renee Descartes was a philosopher who thought that all knowledge started with this question. He figured that we couldn’t learn the true nature of the universe until we knew that things really were as they appeared to be. So, as a thought experiment, Descartes created a malevolent demon that could play with his perceptions. This demon could project the whole world, creating an illusion that could fool all the senses. As in a dream, this projected world would be indistinguishable from reality. In such a world, how could Descartes tell what was really real?
His answer was to propose that no matter our senses, some things could in fact be known through logic. Most famously he declared “cogito ergo sum”, I think, therefore I am. In a more convoluted manner, Descartes also reasoned that there was a perfect and good God who wouldn’t let demons mess with people anyways.
Rick and Morty provides its own set of answers to this question. In the episode “Total Rickall” it is not the senses of the characters that are altered, but their memories. A telepathic space parasite takes up residence in the Smith house. It multiplies by implanting false recollections in its hosts. Soon a gaggle of fake family friends and relatives are populating the place. Each character is the embodiment of memories that seem completely genuine. My personal favorite is cousin Vinny from Jersey who’s catch phrase is “I’m walking here”
Like Descartes demon, the parasites present the same problem. What's the difference between real and imagined, between conjured and concrete?
Despite being the oldest question of western philosophy, this debate still comes up in college dorm rooms, youth hostels, and presumably the Rick and Morty writers room. In the R+M universe, the fake characters prove to be those with no bad memories associated with them. As a sort of opposite to Descartes, anything wholly good can't possibly be real.
The episode ends with a massacre as the real Smith clan quickly purges the parasites. All the memories that seem too good to be true, their avatars are killed.
Except the Smiths make one mistake. Proving that David Hume was right, they find that there is no hard and fast rule for what is authentic and what isn’t. In a crazy unknowable universe, Mr Poopy Butthole might just be the real deal
Stoicisim
“If you are distressed by anything external, the pain is not due to the thing itself, but to your estimate of it; and this you have the power to revoke at any moment.” ― Marcus Aurelius, Meditations
episode: close rick-counters of the rick kind
see also: Seneca the Younger
Radical Freedom and a Life Well Lived
“You beat cancer and then you went back to work at the carpet store?“
- Rick Sanchez, S2E02
If Rick and Morty has one theme, it might be the idea that the human mind was not made to grasp the whole of reality. In the face of a vast and uncaring multiverse, R+M’s characters flail clumsily, bicker, or else abandon reason and composure altogether (ie. worshipping giant heads from space). Even simple attempts at comprehending a mere sliver of existence can leave the characters stunned and disoriented. Take the game “Roy” from the episode “Mortynight Run”.
As Morty plays this game, he takes on the life, the entire life of a boy named Roy. When he puts on the virtual reality helmet, Morty sees Roy as a child with his mother. He lives in Roy as he attends school, becomes a star athlete, marries his high school sweetheart. In this amazing one-minute vignette, we see Roy continue into his 30s with a kid, forced to give up his dreams and instead take a job at the family carpet store. As Roy gets older, he is diagnosed with cancer but survives with a loving family. After recupering, he returns to work where one day at the age of 55 he slips off a tall ladder, breaks his hip, and dies. The game ends. Morty takes off his helmet, no longer ‘Roy’ but some hazy version of himself, trying to contain a lifetime of memories.
“You beat cancer and then you went back to work at the carpet store?”, Rick admonishes him.
The seeming ease with which people go back to work at the carpet store was also criticized by Jean Paul Sartre. In the post WWII era, millions of Roys sprung up across Europe and America, each living in their own private carpet store prisons. Sartre (and Simone De Beavoir) accused such Roys of having bad faith. Like Sartre’s café waiter, Morty’s Roy let society define his actions for him. He conformed to expectations, thus denying his real, inherent freedom.
Rick, of course, does not share this problem. He is unfettered by conventions or norms of any kind. He is the being-for-itself. When Rick plays “Roy”, he exercises his radical freedom, taking Roy off the grid. “Holy shit, this guy doesn’t have a social security number for Roy!”, the alien bystanders marvel.
In the existentialist sense, Rick is truly free. With his nearly unlimited intellect and abilities, Rick is uniquely capable of achieving a life where he can do and say whatever he wants to. And yet, as with other radical thinkers, Rick’s freedom fails to bring him real happiness. The line between existential freedom and nihilism can be a thin one. Wub a lub a dub dub indeed.
Why R + M + P?
For a second, let's forget about how funny this show is. Let's put aside the joy we feel at seeing its outlandish stories and visuals. Let's ignore the fantastic voice work and characters development. Instead let's focus on what makes Rick and Morty special, on the reasons this blog exists. Above all, I want to talk about how R + M can make you think. Skillfully buried in the show's set pieces and throwaway gags are deep and meaningful ideas about life and reality. Seriously. Basically all of the big philosophical questions get asked at some point in the show. Why are we here? Does life have meaning? In a potentially infinite multiverse, can morality exist? Are we really free? Is what we see and feel real? Even just brushing up against these ideas would be impressive for a 30 minute cartoon. But there's more to it. The show fully commits to following through on these questions. Premises are actually lived in. implications, no matter how staggering are taken seriously. To quote birthmoviesdeath.com "it's just fucking bold. It's like futurama gone all the way". Here are just a few of the shows themes that I hope to get into - Rick Sanchez as existentialist hero - see episode Mortynight Run - The multiverse and its implications - see basically all episodes (especially Rixty Minutes and Close Encounters of the Rick Kind) - Metaphysics Rick and Morty style - see episodes M. Night Shaym-Aliens! And Total Rickall
Antinatalism
“Each one of us was harmed by being brought into existence. That harm is not negligible, because the quality of even the best lives is very bad—and considerably worse than most people recognize it to be.”
― David Benatar, Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming Into Existence
“Existence is pain to a Meeseeks“
See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Schopenhauer