Test
Checking that this still works.

Product Placement

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
we're not kids anymore.

Janaina Medeiros
Keni
No title available
AnasAbdin
d e v o n
will byers stan first human second
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

shark vs the universe
art blog(derogatory)

No title available

No title available

JVL

titsay
wallacepolsom
styofa doing anything

Love Begins
No title available
seen from Italy

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from Singapore
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Türkiye
seen from Argentina

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany
seen from Ukraine
@rickhiebert
Test
Checking that this still works.
The -30- Post
Back in history, foreign correspondents used to send their stories by telegraph.
They had a little thing they used to do. To assure their editors there wasn't any problems on their end, they would end by typing and sending -30-.
When i used to write for The Ubyssey, I used to end what i wrote with -30- .My editors were baffled until I eplained.
So this, barring the unforseen, is my last post on my The Vile Rag blog. Today is Sept 22, 2018.If something comes up, I'll refile it at the very end again. Yes, I do hope to write a post on The Ubyssey Today, but I have yet to hear from them ,for permission to come and see them, as I write. If that happens--{It hasn’t as of Oct 15] I’ve already created a blog post that I can update and finish later if needs be.
One last thing. I'm doubful that I will ever get a chance to write a "dead tree" book. So, if that's true, I'll never get to inscribe a book of mine that someone has bought.
Lindsey Lewis is a local novelist, who wrote a book called "From Darkness To Light"
In a used copy of this book, she had incscribed it to a lady like this:
(Lady's name book was inscribed for)
You Are Lovely
May You Live Happily Ever After
Lindsey.
Sweet. Maybe it wouldn't have worled for a hardboiled "newsman” like me, bur something similar would have done the trick.
-30-
[If you’re looking for the post on Linda Frum, it is the very next two posts.]
Linda Frum, reporting...
[ You may say that this post is out of chronological order. Well yes, but Tumblr puts all the posts in one batch, reverse order, newest to first. By putting it at or near the top, Frum's personal FB friends will be more easily able to read it. Dreaming in Technicolour, Frum herself will see it and it will bring back a happy memory for her. ]
In the 80s and early 90s, in Canada's student press, Toronto author Linda Frum was what English newspapers used to call a "Nine Days Wonder". That phrase was used to talk about a news story that broke, and was big news for about a week, and then went on for the net few days of the net week. I'd say that sort of idea applied in Frum's case.
Linda Frum, being of a small c conservative bent, in her last year at McGill University in Montreal in 1983, followed the lead of conservative students across the U.S. who started conservative student newspapers. Frum's paper went up against the ardently liberal McGill Daily, and was written about there, in that paper, and in the Montreal Gazzette, with a Gazette picture of her handing out her newspaper.
Frum graduated. In the summer of 1986, she wrote the cover story for Peter Worthington's short lived glossy magazine Influence. Frum posed for a cover photo and wrote the cover story, in which she outlned the issues she had had with the McGill university admnistration when she published her newspaper.
Canadian University Press, the national student press organization, printed a House Organ in which it shared correspondence, news stories and other items it thought of interest to student papers across Canada. Frum's Influence story was splashed all over that fall 1986 House Organ.
Frum was given a contract by Key Porter Books to write a book guide to Candian universities, to be published in the fall of 1987.
Around the same time as the House Organ, in the fall of 1986 CUP's internal newsletter This Week and More had a note from CUP National Bureau Chief Melinda Wittstock. She wrote that student journalists across Canada had been "accosted" by Frum in her travels researching the book. Please call her. She's thinking of doing a story.
The late fall of 1986. The front door of the Ubyssey's office in SUB 241K opens.I recognize Frum straight away,
"I' m writing a book guide to Canadian universities. Can someone help me?"
"Sure."
So she sat down and briefly interviwed me for her book. I walked her outside our door so we could talk privately.
"Do you know that you are a heroine of mine?" Frum looks amazed.
She was coming back to UBC the following day. I arrange to come early, before the interview she has scheduled.with a UBC official.
I interview her for a Ubyssey story. You can tell it was held for a while, as I have her as being "23" in my story. and she turned 24 before it ran.
A photographer has arrived. He walks us towards Frum's appointment so he can take a picture. She is in good time for her appointmant.
We look for a place for the picture. "I say "Maybe you could sit on that pile of dirt there...."
Frum looks back at me, sees that I am smiling and therefore kidding, and breaks out laughing. We find a park bench for her.
I finish walking her to her appointment and we say friendly goodbyes.
I had made a "long distance friend" who was very kind to me, from a distance, during my Unyssey years. I'd occasionally call Frum on the phone to chat.
Fast forward to the fall of 1990.
After the book had come out, a filmmaker had thought that a "video guide to Canadian universities might be a good idea.
They recruited Frum for the project. Linda Frujm's Video Guide To Canadian Universities.
One of the first places they went was UBC. Frum visited The Ubyssey's office to surprise me.
I didn't know of this. Frum and her videio camera operator had arrived to find that I had gone home sick.
Making lemons into lemonade. Frum set up the camera and talked to other Ubyssey staffers who were there. She phoned my house and left a message as I was in transit.
When Linda Frum's Video Guide to Canadian Universities came out in the fall of 1991, The Ubyssey was the only student paper mentioned in the video. Although it is not named in the video, it's obviously The Ubyssey.
The section talking about The Ubyssey specifically starts with a "tracking shot " of The Ubyssey office.
Frum, offsceen, narrates:
"Almost as absurd as the way these people talk are the archaic politics of UBC's student newspaper..."
It cuts to a shot of Ubyssey staffer Matthew Subotnick. He's sitting on a couch in between editors Martin Chester and Rebecca Bishop.
Frum, offscreen, asks Matthew: "You say that this [The Ubyssey] is a collective. How does that work exactly?"
Matthew points to Bishop and Chester beside him and exultantly says:
"These guys have no power!"
"Rick, you...., " I can hear my old Ubyssey friends saying, "Why didn't you mention this to us?"
Well I am now, sorry. At the time, I was working on two stories on the release of Frum's video. One I wrote for a national audience, and one for a UBC audience. I didn't want the stories to be "spiked" and get flak from my friends. Sorry again.
My national story ran n at least eight papers across the country. So it was useful to them. Only a couple Ontario papers noticed that the video had come out and reported on it aside from me.
But any miffed Ubyssey friends might recall that I "buried the lede" a little in my "national" story.
My first sentence there was "At the University of Toronto 'nobody cares if you live or die' "
Sorry Linda, but it is probably my favorite introduction to any story that I wrote during my many years as student journalist. It is certainly arresting.
Why in this blog? Well, I was indirectly the cause of Linda Fum becoming a little passing part of Ubyssey history. Frum walked to center stage, did a little curtsey for he audience, and walked off again.
But all this resulted in the nicest thing ever to happen to me when I was a Ubyssey staffer.
Back in 1990, I called Frum to say "Sorry I missed. you" I also talked to my Ubyssey friends about Frum's whirlwind visit.
I talked to Ubyssey editor Nadene Rehnby, an old friend.
Without my prompting them in any way, they both said exactly the same thing to me. Rehnby referring to Frum and Frum referring to Rehnby.
They said, each on their own, this.
"You know Rick, when we talked, she had some *really* nice things to say about you."
Linda Frum in 1990. (When I knew her...)
“...students forgot why they hated us....”
1995 Co-ordinating editor Siobhan Roantree had one good reason why UBC students had voted to ressurect The Ubyssey.
She told reporter Tom Hawthorn. for his article on The Ubyssey for The Greater Vancouver Book, this:
"We were away for so long that students forgot why they hated us so much."
Warning: Newspaper at Play (featuring “Patty Hearst” )
The Magic Blue Editor’s Dress. Did you have it around during your own years at The Ubyssey?
Anyways....people at The Ubyssey used to have the money, editorial space and inclination to overtly try to have fun with what they were doing.
For example, in 1964-65, future Prime Minister Kim Campbell was a darling on campus as the first year student’s representtative on the AMS council. She was always getting covered in the paper, had her picture taken, and such.
In March 1965, she turned 18. In the March 11, 1965 issue there was a photo of a male student holding up to her a giant sign saying “18 Now you’re...”with a picture of the silhouette of a back panther that they used to use to show that a film was “RESTRICTED” and only those 18 an above could go see it. Fortunately it was a big sign that the possibly naked guy holding the sign right in front of him was showing to Miss Campbell...
Campbell took life with the ‘geers’, UBC’s Engineering students, in stride, As part of her AMS responsibilites, she had an office. She quipped to a Ubyssey reporter that she had “an open door policy” because the ‘geers had swiped the door to her AMS office.
The Ubyssey played along with another prank by the ‘geers. In February 1963, several abstract statues of nude seeming figures appeared on campus.
Late that month a picket appeared beside the statues. “Ralph the mystery picket” was protesting with signs around the statues complaining that they were indecent. “Ralph” and some friends put clothes on the statues.
In September 1963, eight brand new statues mysteriously appeared on campus. Some of the statues were near or next to the genuine ones that UBC had put out in the spring.
On Ctober 2, the engineers struck. Several dozen of them took crowbars and sledgehammers to the brand new statues, not, please note, the old ones. Photos of the destruction were run in the Ubyssey.
The Ubyssey revealed that it had been a glorious prank and the paper had been in on it. Students and faculty had been talking about the newer statues for weeks, but, The Ubyssey reported “no one had bothered to find out if they were real.”
The paper added that the statues “were fakes put on the campus by the engineering students to prove that UBC didn’t know junk from art.”
The Ubyssey also used to cover the T-Cup football game in the spring. Surely, this tradition is long gone...Female students in the Nursing and the Family and Nutritional Sciences faculties would suit up and play a game on a big field.
The ‘geer’s love of shells of old Volkswagen Beetle cars, was usually covered by The Ubyssey. Such as the amazing places they would be put, such as on the top of Buchnan Tower, the student residence, or hanging from the Lion’s Gate Bridge.
The Ubyssey scored big in 1975. The Engineering Undergraduate Society used to have a newpaper called The Red Rag. The Red Rag was typeset at College Printers, the same place where The Ubyssey was also typset and printed. [My very first year at the paper, we did “contra deals” with restauraunts. The Ubyssey will trade an ad in the paper for the restaurant feeding a table of Ubyssey staffers on production night. We’d eat and then carry on to Collge Printers where we’d “put the paper to bed “.]
So, 1975. The Ubyssey staff gathered at College Printers. They noticed that a special edition of The Red Rag was laid out on “flats” to be put out soon during “Engineering Week” So, they got out a typewriter, hand drew some cartoons and had some new “headlines” ypeset and all of a sudden, The Red Rag had become Maoist.
The Red Rag was published before the next Ubyssey. While students laughed at the Red Rag complaining that the UBC administration was “revanchist” The Ubyssey primly had a story wondering who had done the foul deed.
From the 1920s to 1940s, the Ubyssey had regular humour columns, Eric Nicol got his start at The Ubyssey before becoming a famous Canadian humorist. In 1947, Nicol had a prank played on him by fellow Ubyssey staffer Les Bewley--the latter would become a judge and then a ideologically conservative Vancouver Sun columnist.
During my own time at The Ubyssey, I did a story on one of Nicol’s later books. I’d heard of the prank and asked Nicol about it for a sidebar story.
Bewley, Nicol told me, took a donations can and collected money. When he had enough money, Bewley went downtown to Birks and had a plaque made. It was erected in Brock Hall As of the 1990s, the plaque was still up and I took a photo of it for The Ubyssey, which it ran with this story.
Nicol remembered that UBC professor G.G. Sedgewick was persuaded to officiate at the grand unveiling of the plaque, which read : “In Loving Memory of JABEZ (Eric P. Nicol) beloved campus humorist who for a full decade gave to his fellow man the precious gift of laughter.”
Sedgewick was not impressed.
Nicol remembered: “It was a very small gathering., around lunchtime, and Sedgewich was fed up with the whole thing too, and figured that it was some kind of a lark. All he could do was tear the cloth off the plaque, mutter a few obscenites, and stride off back to his classes.”
The Ubyssey has always had a sense of humour about itself.
For example, when The Ubyssey’s offices were much more of a place to hang out and get to know people than it seems to be these days. They would have year end dinners.
There. staffers would get joke “awards” that gently teased them in good humour. Over the years, I got and kept several of them..
Here is one I got:
I can’t forget The Magic Blue Editor’s Dress.
At the very top of this post, you’ll see a photo of an innocent Ubyssey staffer who had been dared to try on the dress, went to the bathroom and came back wearing it.
He had to know that a camera was witing for his return.
Anyways, several swarthy guys were featured in various staff recruitment ads over the years wearing the MBED. It has to be long gone, and current Ubyssey staff probably have no idea that it ever existed. Just like the framed photo of Enver Hoxha that we had to use to illustrate a news story one night.
Cub reporter Tom Wayman (yes, *the* Tom Wayman) found SFU in 1963, as it was being built. A series of “gag’ photos followed Wayman on his quest over the next two weeks on his quest to find “Simon Fraser Academy” or SFA” as the waggish Ubyssey dubbed it.
The series ended with a composite faked picture of future SFU chancellor-to-be Gordon Shrum isitting at a desk in an otherwise empty clearing.
“Shrum” is quoted as saying: “This, all this is mine. All this is SFA” (Hint: not “Simon Fraser Academy)
The Ubyssey still likes to do parodies of print media today. During my own years there, it parodied The Completely Straight (Georgia Straight), The Vancouver Stunned (Vancouver Sun) The Gripe and Wail (Globe and Mail) and The Provincial Enquirer (Province).
I’ll finish with an old Ubyssey tradition that it doesn’t have the space for any more, the “joke story”.
It read as if it could be plausible...until you read the “turn” of the story on another page. In my time, there were two phone lines in SUB 241K, with two different phone numbers. One year, we did a “joke story” that students were going to get an extra GST cheque. We gave a phone number for getting information about the cheque and it was the second number, which we never printed in the paper. We got calls for two months on that line after the “GST” “joke story ran. I know. I fielded lots of them.
Of course, the kicker was to read the “turn” of the story.. When The Ubyseey went on to quote The Queen, Moammar Quadaffi and The Pope all saying ridiculous things, the penny was supposed to drop.
The story that ran on page one of the Nov. 26 1974 Ubyssey succeded spectacularly. People neded to “read the turn” and think about it. But they didn’t.
A journalist should have smelled a rat. First, the story is the bottom one of the page instead of trumpeting a scoop.
Here is a hyperlink to that paper as saved on the UBC Library’s online PDF files:
http://www.library.ubc.ca/archives/pdfs/ubyssey/UBYSSEY_1974_11_26.back
Heiress Patty Hearst, older readers may recall, had been kidnapped in February by the Sybionese Liberation Army. After participating in a bank robbery, the FBI was avidly looking for Hearst.
Then The Ubyssey was naughty. It reported that Hearst had come to campus for a couple of hours and given an impromptu speech to ‘students in “Totem Park cafeteria”.
A murky photo of a long haired woman--shot from the back and cradling a shotgun in one arm--ran withe the story. A Ubyssey staffer of course.
A cassette recording of “Hearst’s” speech reportedly mysteriously appeared in a Ubyssey mailbox. in it she says “The dark majesty of proletarian oneness could not be shaken loose.”
The “story” goes on to note that “Hearst” got a standing ovation for her speech. However, the “turn” of the story quotes the UBC “Food service director as being asked why cafeteria workers hadn’t noticed “Hearst” in the cafeteria. And some other people being silly. A tip off that it is “fake news” as the term is today.
So there you go. Two days later, two letters in The Ubyssey had fun with the story. One letter says “I happen to know personally that Patty Hearst is dead....So stop looking for her. Sign me ‘anonymous’ Patty Hearst Windsor, Ontario.”
One last piece of Ubyssey lore about this “joke story”. In my day, there were huge plywood desks in SUB241K. One had a big gash in one side. I was told that it was where an angry news cameraman, part of a crew that had driven up from KOMO TV in Seattle, had kicked it.
The Ubyssey in recent years (And hopefully today)
My Ubyssey colleagues back in the day might have said “Economics is king”
I guess that advertsing in a student newspaper is a bit of a “boutique purchase” these days, particularly after the recessions of the 2000s dried up the money somewhat.
The Ubyssey now publishes once a week in a“dead tree” edition. The dead tree papers seem small to me--given that it is once a week--, for what it’s worth. I would love to be wrong.
The Ubyssey has to be careful with its money.
If I get to talk to currebt Ubyssey staffers, and ask them questions and field what they may want to comment to me. It will go here....
Resurrection
[The brochure that helped The Ubyssey to win the early 1995 referendum, during the AMS elections, that brought the paper back to life.]
In the 1995 AMS elections, The Ubyssey persuaded UBC students to bring the paper back to life; starting in the fall of 1995.
The photo at the top of this post is of a leaflet the paper handed out, and posted ion campus. I came onto campus, as I had graduated, and got one for my files.
This poster/leaflet addresses various questions that Ubysmals thought that student voters had before the Rererendum.
1. Why does The Ubyssey need $5 per student (Now adjusted annually for inflation.)
A. It cost money for various epenses to put out a newspaper....to campaign in a referendum, legal fees....
Comments from me:
1. Seeing as though people could, and do, pick up copies of The Ubyssey for free, it’s only right that they pay for it.
2. Ad revenue would drop to the point where The Ubyssey only publishes a “dead tree” paper once a week. The Gateway, at the University of Alberta doesn’t publish “dead tree’ papers any more.
2. Aren’t you just the same people as last year?
A. “Nope” The Ubyssey taff estimated that only 10 per cent of possible staff would be returning from the past. They also emphasized that most of the experienced people had come from other student newspapers.
3, “I heard that members of clubs can’t work on the paper. True?
A. Categorically false The “conflict of interest parts of the proposed bylaws “banned” people from covering their own clubs. As far as I knpw, it was on;y in place to prevent it from being a problem if it arose. Hasn’t happened...
4. It asked about refunds of individual student subsidies.
A. The Ubyssey promised that it was working on a refund procedure.
Comment: this addresses what I will call “The Jason Saunderson problem” (please see earlier posts). You’ll recall that he whined in the media that he hated The Ubyssey and didn’t want to pay for it. It wasn’t right.
Cheap so-and so. He was happy to 1) pick up free Ubysseys and 2) have the paper print his many letters.
If you take a free paper, you should “pay the freight.”
The referendum question safely passed. The first edition of the post-referendum paper was in Sept. 1995.
Scott Hayward, Co-ordinating Editor in 1996-97 said in the special 90th anniversary supplement that it wasn’t guaranteed that The Ubyssey would both meet the 10 per cent of all tudents voting in the referendum, and then getting more yes votes than no. Hayward noted that most AMS referendums failed for this reason.
“Ironically, the people who helped the most in ensuring the necassary turnout” reports the supplement, was the engineering students. “We went out to the engineers because they were a big organized group... We went out and talked to them and drank beer with them.” Hayward said, in the supplement.
5,500 students voted in the referendum and it passed with 67 percent of the vote.
The Ubyssey agreed to make into the SUB basement in 2001 in order to get back into SUB. After a few years of no natural light, The Ubssey is in the new “student union” building The Nest.
So, The Ubyssey was resurrected
“Get In The Ring” with The Ubyssey, Siobhan and Bill at CiTR
So, Ubyssey editor-elect and AMS President Bill Dobie had a debate about The Ubyssey on the CiTR debate program “Get In the Ring” in August 1994.
Yours truly waded into the “Pier Six Waterfront Pier Bar Brawl at the start when i asked a couple questions of Dobie. You can tell it’s me when Dobie mournfully says “Hello Rick....”
Siobhan starts laughing and the CiTR host says something like “do you know him?’
Success! I saved it as a YouTube video....audio part starts about 20 seconds in. Whole thing lasts for about 14 minutes. You can hear this for yourself.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ml10WFxmUZI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ml10WFxmUZI
The Great Lost Ubyssey Parody
The Ubyssey, in its last issue of 1994 before publication was suspended for just over a year, had *two* parody inserts.
You’re all familiar with The Ubyssey's parody of itself, The Ufeces.
But I would bet the mortgage money, your kids' lunch money and the money to pay for the electricity to keep your grandma's iron lung running that you have not heard of the second.
Nobody has, as it was printed in the same size and format as the ad inserts that The Ubyssey runs. UBC Libraries probably thought it was an ad insert and never kept it. So it was lost to history. Until now.
"British Columbia Distorts" parodied British Colunbia Report, the conservative newsmagazine published in the late 1980s and 1990s.
It was a sly 8 page dig directed mostly at Rick Hiebert, the author of this blog. I had started freelacing a lot for "B.C. Report" as they nicknamed it in their newsroom, particularly during the 1993-94 school year. Occasionally I would cover the same story for British Columbia Report *and* The Ubyssey. At the same time. Guess my Ubyssey colleagues noticed.
The Ubyssey staff was better at keeping secrets than CIA agents. I didn't hear a thing. Perhaps that's just as well. In retrospect I wouldn't have wanted to be tempted to participate in the parody.
Hopefully, I'll ne able to save a cover photo of the Distorts parody But if it doesn’t work, I've saved a photo on the public-may-view section of my Facebook page.
This is the hyperlink:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10155395983375947&set=a.10151364886455947&type=3&theater Back to the parody. I noticed it when stacks of it were next to boxes of The Ubyssey.I thought it was neat and funny in parts. A bit ham handed in others.
My favourite part is where they "did" a story on The Ubyssey in question and answer form. Editor Steve Chow was asked incredibly leading questions and his "answers" were recorded as "No" or "That's not true" and answers like that.
For years, British Columbia Report had full page "house ads" for the book "Act of Faith", particularly when they couldn't sell two full page ads in an issue. Act of Faith, full of articles on the beginning and rise of the Reform Party Of Canada had been published by a book arm of British Columbia Report..
Here's a hyperlink to a reference to the book:
http://www.bookcrossing.com/journal/9729773/
So, The Ubyssey spoofed the book in an ad as Party on, Preston! with various AMS figures that Ubyssey staffers didn't like endorsing the book.
I took my new colleagues at British Columbia Report copies of the parody next time I went to their newsroom. They laughed and seemed to think it was funny. These people could laugh at their own foibles. Unlike my old colleagues at The Ubyssey who seemed to have been weaned on a pickle. Dour and humourless, occasionally.
This introduces in my mind, the question "How did you get along so well with people at The Ubyssey, seeing as though you aren't progressive?" Well, we had a common goal, putting out a paper, and people being people of good will can go far. Thinking that you yourself are *not* all that and a bag of chips helps too.
Two memos from the AMS
Interesting things happened while UBC students were in exams. For Ubyssey staffers too
All this happened During May 3 and 4, 1994. These memos, which I photocopied and replaced were put on The Ubyssey office door while Ubysmals were in exams.
You'll recall that the AMS is looking for an editor in chief for The Ubyssey with dictatorial powers.
I think, based on these memos, they couldn't find a suitable Quisling.
First on May 3, there was this from Janice Boyle, the AMS Vice-president. It's about the "Jason Saunderson case".
Recall that Samuelson has a grudge against The Ubyssey (Posts passim).
Boyle now informs The Ubyssey that the AMS has a "dispute" with Saunderson "over the natutre of comments about him in The Ubyssey".
Comment: The Ubssey ran everthing he gave us as letters AFAIK. The only thing they did was to put catty titles on his letters as headlines. Keep in mind that he rails against the paper for 10 colunb inches, say. All The Ubyssey as a whole can say back is say an inch long.
This will be unnerving to Ubysmals. Boyle writes "in order to defend The Ubyssey successfuly. The Ubyssey needs the co-operation of The Ubyssey editors who were involved with the paper at the time the comments were published."
"....To date we have not recieved a response' Without full co-operation from the editors of The Ubyssey who were involved at the time. the AMS may have to settle unnecessatily...”
Comments: 1. The AMS wants paper staff to track down people who may have graduated and moved away?
2 During exams?
3. Do we want a student government leaning on students to track down other students who might have felt a need to be anonymous, etc. ?
Boyle continues ",,,,Please coantact our General Manager before May 27th if you have any information as to where these past editors and staff can be contacted...."
The AMS is acting in bad faiith because they ask The Ubyssey to do these things before May 27 This means that, given the locks will be changed the next day they effectively have *24 hours* to go into their office where contact information may be, to track everyone down.
The AMS wanted The Ubyssey to fail, and then use that as an excuse to do what the mext Memo talks about.
Memo 2.
The next memo is dated May 4 1994 and was also posted on the door of SUB 241K (The Ubyssey's office).
It is from and signed by Tim Lo the AMS Director of Administration.
It begins "I have asked that the lock to Room 241 K be changed. " Lo says that a computer and printer work $3,000 have been stolen. Also, The Ubyssey's typesetting software has gone missing,.
New keys will be issued "when the new editor-in-chief has been selected."
(So co-operate with the new AMS hired editor or you lose your office. Which is what happened.)
Stolen things? Don't know anything about that....Don't think the AMS ever caught anybody. If there was a theft. They would have prosecuted and told the media....
The AMS tries for an editor-in-chief
Evidently, the AMS (UBC's student goverment/ council was still unhappy with the Ubyssey in April 1993. And they waited until the students who they harped about were in exams to do something about it.
"It's the annual Ubyssey debacle", AMS president Bill Dobie eplained to The Vancouver Sun in their April 13, 1994 paper.
What was the issue was The Ufeces, the Ubyssey's parody of itself that appeared in the last issue of the year. (There were two...please see my upcoming post The Great Lost Ubyssey Parody).
Dobie told the Sun that he was worried that "The problem is that you can tell when it's a sppof issue and when it's not.'
He added that of course the AMS could take a joke, but The Ufeces had "focused" the concerns of AMS council memners with the paper..
This story "had legs" as the Province and even The Globe And Mail would wind up reporting on this as well.
In the Sun edtor-elect Sarah O'donnell said "This is the death of freedom of the press." she said "By choosing their own editors, they're choosing what kind of news we'll report."
"...But ultimately the paper has to understand---whether they like it or not--is thir publisher and they are not an autonomous group that can do whetever it wants." , Bill Dobie added. after his early comment....
The AMS, according to The Globe and Mail, had put out a release saying The Ubyssey 'finally crossed the line betwen political criticism and personal insult..."
In The Province AMS member Leah Costello defended the AMS' move to appoint an editor that woulld be "someone who will be directly accountable and responsible for what goes into that paper.
I think that the Province reporter used the old reporter’s rule of "Shut up and let your source talk."
Costello was quoted as sying next "If I look in the past seven issues of the paper. they have not once mentioned my policies. All the've mentioned are my looks and put pictures of me in the paper. That's not thought provoking."
On the evening of April 13 1994 the AMS voted that a sub-committee OF AMS members would hire an editor in chief.
AMS president Bill Dobie told the Sun that an appointed editor-in-chief would improve the paper's quality, but editor-elect Sarah O'Donnell was skeptical. "Any person on campus can become a Ubyssey staff member. But not every student can be part of a selections commitee. And people on a selections committe don't knw what is takes to put out a paper," O'Donnell told the Sun.
Storm clouds blow in
On Sept. 24 1993, Alex Strachan of The Vancouver Sun reported on the first new fall issue of The Ubyssey..
He was kind and mentioned me, by name, as a returning staffer from the previous year. But all was not quiet in Dodge
Although the AMS publications board. (Mentioned in the last post) had progressed enough for Ubyssey news editor Graham Cook to be worried about it, at the end of the year, it would be the AMS that would shut down The Ubyssey directly.
But for now, I will relate what Cook was worried about in the fall of 1993.
"It's not business as usual." Cook told the Sun, "We'd be lying if we didn't say that we think about the effect a particularly contoversial story might have before we print it. The most subtle and insidious firm of censorship is self-censorship--when journalistts take it on themselves because they're worried about people looking over their shoulder.
Scott Heyward--a member of AMS council-- said that The Ubyssey being temporarily shut down over the summer was necessary for financial and editorial reasons. He cited the Not-Illegal if... editorial and the sex issue as factors.. (I've discussed both in this blog).
Heyward was a member of the new board,,,,but practically it wouldn't work and the AMS would just go nuclear and shut The Ubyysey down in the spring.
Cook added at the end of the story that the best solution for The Ubyssey was to go for "autonomy", and it had been discussed 8 or 9 times' since the start of the 80s.
The Ubyssey would have to have UBC students vote in autonomy in 1995 to come back to life. But it happened.
If anyone would slam The Ubyssey...
British Columbia Report, the newsmagazine that published from the late 80s through most of the 90s, was ideologically conservative in the way it approached its journalism.
I should know, I would eventaully go on staff there and work there happily.
News stories nd columns in British Colmbia Report would occasionally criticize The Ubyssey. As I was a Ubyssey alum, my Report editor and I agreed that I should not report on The Ubyssey for the magazine.
In the June 21, 1993 issue of the magaine, reporter Ellen Saenger reported fairly on the curent fuss about The Ubyssey.
She reported, in passing on Foran's "it's not illegal...' Icident and that year's sex issue, which i've mentioned bafore on this blog
Furhermore, she wrote, the AMS had asked for a new constitution for the paper. Staffers obliged, But the AMS balked at the proposed constition.
AMS Vice PresidentJanice Boyle was upset, in the story, that no one person was in charge. The entire staff collective could outvote editors in making decisions and Boyle worried that this could lead to fianacial and editorial irresponsibility..
On May 19, the AMS voted to establish a publications board that would govern all student publiactions. Members of the board were to include two members of each student publication, two members os the AMS council and three members of the communty, one of whom was to be a working member of the media The boards propsed guidelines said that stffaers were to be "objective and impartial observers when reposrting news"
Graham Cook was to be a news editor in 1993-94. He points out in the story that whle the new publications board could do things immediately, like firiing an editor, appealing the board's decisions could be subject to AMS delays.
Saenger's story is admirably even-handed, although the story subhead reported"The UBC student government shuts its pornographic student newspaper'.
So what happened? The publications board was set up--I have my doubts that it was set up properly,. When The Ubyssey was shut down the following spring, the AMS took direct charge of what happened itself.
Pow!
I’d better mention Pow.
Pow was a special issue of The Ubyssey that appeared one issue in every four from 1992 to 1994.
Brain Truscott reported in the Vancouver Courier, shortly after the special edition was launched, that an artcle in the first ediation of Pow, Asians and Indo-Canadians made up 40 perecent of the 28,000 students at UBC. “But a 1991 media survey found that 25 consecuting issues of The Ubyssey failed to show one photograph of Asians or Indo-Canadians. Few were interviewed.”
Pow was aimed to address this and attracted many from these groups to the paper.
Frances Foran, a Ubyssey editor, told the Courier that Pow hadn’t caused a schism in the paper. Bur, from what I observed at the time, people tended to write for one paper or the other. Not a hard and fast rule, but that’s what tended to happen.
Jason Saunderson refuted
The last of the callers to the March 12, 1993 Bill Good radio call in show to comment on the paper was Ubyssey critic Jason Saunderson.
Saunderson was a member of the campus Young Conservatives (or Young Tories as most called them.) (Quick thing....Female Mystery Caller, referring to Saunderson, called him a young Conservative" Would you have done that?)
Anyways, when Saunderson gets on the air he makes an argument about freedom of association.
He said. "Students are forced to support this paper through their student fees and I felt that was wrong."
Comments: 1) I've looked at online PDF files of The Ubyssey and it seems that the paper was often printing a letter from Saunerson, usually assailing The Ubyssey in some way.
Saunderson, as you'll read in a bit, was doing a petition drive to get an AMS referendum on whether The Ubyssey's funding should be taken away.1. Jason, Isn't it nice of The Ubyssey to print all your letters to drum up support for your petition? 2) Obviously you had to pick up and read free issues of The Ubyssey that you are not willing to pay for through your student fees. You're welcome.
Saunderson then goes on to talk about his petition to force a AMS referendum on Ubyssey funding. 984 students, on a campus of well over 20,000 students signed his petition. He admitted to the radio audience that his petition failed by 16 signatures.
But Saunderson soldiers on saying that the unrest on campus is unequalled and "there is no support for this newspaper".
Comment; Which is why you did not get at least 1,000 signatures. People went “Meh”
Saunderson: "I think it's illegitimate and they have no concern.
Bill Good asks why Saunderson and his friends are upset with The Ubyssey.
"It's consistently politically biased. They have a stranglehol dwith the structure--my understanding of their sructure of their editorial board. They decide whether or not your work gets published. And If you publish two articles you become a voting member."
Practically. Ubyssey editors could not ban anything that someone was determined to get in the paper if they had the support of other staffers. In March 1989, I got a lauding review of a Barry Goldwater autobiography in The Ubyssey.
If you could write news, and not just op-eds, you could get news of interest to conservative students into the paper.
I did it too many times to count.
I could interview whoever I wanted to. Pursue whatever stories I liked.
Oh and it was not "two stories" but three contributions in some way on an issue or issues of the paper. Had Saunderson done three of these contributions, he could have been a voting staff member too.
But it's easier to bitch and moan that put your shoulder to the wheel.
Progressives have a saying: "Who shows up wins." Very true for The Ubyssey in my day. Saunderson never showed up, therefore he culd not win.
Saunderson had a wrong understanding of how a collective organization like The Ubyssey ran. Everone had a say and we all decided things by vote, deocratically. Saunderson continues:
"Thet've got a stranghold from the editors down. Not just the views of wht I would call the left-wing group who controls the newspaper and I believe is a matter of freedom of association. there's no choice for me whether I should fund it."
That’s why we had security guards with shotguns stationed at the front door of SUB 241K to wing conservatives who wanted to work for the paper. Not.
Saunderson hangs up.
Bill Good seems to have had enough with Saunderson. He says (paraphrase) If The Ubyssey were a right-wing paper, who you like it better? Would freedom of association be a problem then?
i wish Saunderson had come into the office. Had I met him, I would have explained to him, politely where he was talking out of his hat.
An editor could have said: "We discriminate against conservatives? Rick! (waves me over) Q.E.D. ! "
The “Mystery Female Caller”
Bill Good, on his March 12, 1993 CKNW, after Foran and van Isschot left, had a caller phone in who I will dub "The Mystery Female Caller (MFC) She opens by saying: she is " ...a sad and disgusted Unyssey taffer"
She adds "These people are on their way out and won't be around next year. and a lot of us who will be around next year are look at what happened this year are shaking our heads.'
Bill Good asks "What happened/"
"On two counts, the paper came very close to being shut down and we had a Young Conservative circulate a petition calling for The Ubyssey's fuding to be cut off. He came up 29 odd signatures short of the...."
Bill Good interrupts then she goes on.
"...The paper came very close having a referendum on whether or not we should have our subsidy cut off from the students."
Comment: 20 odd implies between 20 and 30. Jason saunderson (next post) will say 16.
Second comment on "almost stut down twice" a) I was in the Ubyssey office almost every day and although the AMS was Not incredibly. happy with us, nothing like that had happened....yet as of the time of the broadcast. b) British Columbia Report, the conservative newsmagaine, wasn't a big fan of The Ubyssey. In June, they would send reporter Ellen Saenger to campus to do a story on the fuss with The Ubyssey. Had The Ubyssey "almost been shut down twice,” Saenger would have reported this. But she does not.
Bill Good asks "Are you backing the paper in what they out in the paper/"
"No, I think the paper downplayed it. We completely covered it up, We didn't fulfill our role as the student media covering that giant issue as far as I'm concerned."
Coments: 1) I covered what up? I've replayed the tape several times and I don't follow..
2) MFC seems to vary between "The Ubyssey (2nd person) and "we" (first prtson). Make of that what you will....
Observations thus far while CKNW goes on a commercial break.
1. Granted it has been 25 years. but I don't recognize MFC's voice
2. MFC offers no identifying details, so I can guess who she is. Not that she is a "plant" but that makes me wonder.
About being a plant. There was enough details floating around about The Ubyssey that you could try. Bill Good, bless him, could be fooled.
After the commercial break, Mystery Female Caller is brought back.
Good asks "How would you describe The Ubyssey?"
MFC replies "A student paper is supposed to provide an alernative to explore issues that aren't discussed in the mainstream. we're supposed to be the students the inustices in society and how the students can change them and there is room for putting in controversial material that no one else would so we should. However some of tha material that came out this year...some of us we're really embarrassed about and disgusted. We did run hate literature in the Valentine issue. Something that ifit had been against a woman instaed of a man, I think that probably there would have been major legal action."
Pictures or it didn't happen?
Okay, go to the Feb.12, 1993 issue of The Ubyssey; I wouldn’t advise it at all....
You'll notice that it is an "ad ghetto" page and the author is "Beast" Filler cribbed from a "rough trade" magazine of some kind for gays?
From what I recall. there was no visit from the RCMP, no letters from a lawyer. If anyone had been approached, he would have probably declined to proceed on Charter grounds.
So MFC was perhaps fearful or only pretending to be. Nothing happened about that article specifically as far as I know.
As you might pick up, critics of The Ubyssey tried to hang “controversal” items around the paper's neck like the dead albatross in the fanous poem. In alluding to this article, when they say that there were some things in the article...they are not being accurate.
Are they thinking 'Oh I can just say whatever...'?" no one in Good's audience has seen it. They will never check.
Bill Good now interrupts and notes that a mainstream paper had called The Ubyssey "a smutty campus publication". I think I know who and in what context.)
Mystery Female Caller continues:
"I think mayne in that particular issue we did make a really big mistake, and why I'm really angry because i think the editorial collective this year is ultimately responsible enen though it;s staffers too. We should have been there on that production night and made sure it didn't happen, What I would like to ask if where we are left, the future staffers. None of the figures are very relaible. We print 15,000 issues. It looks like the pickups are 4,000.
I picked up every Ubyssey from a box when it came out. Most were picked up. An outsider "plant" could guess 4,000 but they would have been wrong. Had i noticed that there were stacks of unread Ubysseys, being an ethical journalist, I would have said something to Ellen Saenger when she wrote her story in June as an FYI. Ask both the Ubyssey and its critics how many people read it.
MFC adds: "We lost $5,000 in ad revenue so far and they're still coming in."
I didn't hear it when I came in The Ubyssey office and it was my default hang out place when I came to UBC.
MFC continues: "The AMS is getting angry letters ll the time. They are at a point where they are conidering cutting ties with us in a divorce agreement. There's no way The Ubyssey could survive without its subsidy. It's a really scary situation.. The Ubyssey is in deep trouble."
Small point Why not "We are in deep trouble."
I'll be posting on Ellen Saenger's June 21 1993 British Columbia Report story on this.
Bill Good asks the Mystery Female Caller if The Ubyssey should be worried about attacking the AMS, the UBC administration and such.
She says "We shouldn't under normal circumstances... But in this year....Now there are good and bad years, there are better and worse papers. And last year {this year just ending] and this year, there were inexperienced editors. This [coming} year, there will brobably be very inexperienced editors,"
At the time of Good's broadcast, the editorial elections for the following year had not happened yet. They were on yes/no paper ballots for each person. She does say "Probably", but how does she know who will be picked and how unexperienced they are?
A "plant" calling from the outside may say something like that
The MFC continues: "We're in a situation where student opinion is so much against us because of bad papers and bad news judgement that we are in danger of being shut down because this is a real threat.and we could be shut down really easily."
Well, any unease wouldn't last. In the 2008 Ubyssey history From The Penthouse To the Basement, 1006-97 editor Scott Hayward credited Engineering students for getting out the vote in the 1995 AMS referendum to bring The Ubyssey back to life. The Ubyssey's "side" won handily. But...i'll get to that in another post.
One last peculiar thing with the MFC. The *very* next caller to make it on the air was Ubyssey critic at the time Jason Saunderson (my net post).
Seeing as thought tens of callers had called in on other topics on the same broadcast, I wouldn't be suprised if you smelled a rat.
This is how it could have gone. Mystery Female Caller knows Saunderson. has been primed by him to be a "disgrunted staffer". This is why some of what MFC says may not be eactly. right. The current editors don't know what they are doing. Next year's editors, who haven't been elected yet, won't know what they are doing. Things like that.
MFC and Saunderson call at the same time. Maybe, they are in the same house with two different phone lineas.
They happen to go 1-2 in the order. Now, as CKNW has hundreds of thousands of listeners in Vancouver and on the Island., How likely is that to happen?