I’m Not Lost, Just on my Way
When I began this course almost four months ago, I had a limited understanding of nature interpretation. I truly believe this course has profoundly changed my outlook on life. As a minor example, I used to get an icky feeling near cemetery’s and felt that they were simply places of sombreness. However, after our lab at the Guelph Cemetery, my perspective on this aspect of death was suddenly given light. As another example, after our musical lab with James Gordon, I was inspired to write lyrics of my own. In fact, just two weeks ago I registered for my first guitar lesson, and am already able to play a few chords. I believe that I was “gifted a spark” in many ways throughout this course; not just in nature.
Upon entering this course, I had expectations to learn about effective nature interpretation. These expectations were exceeded, as I was not only given instructions on how to effectively interpret, but was also given the opportunity to practice interpreting to my peers. My presentations throughout this course provided me with a greater understanding of my preferred interpretive techniques, and my own opinions and beliefs. Below I have broken them down into the categories of personal ethics, beliefs and responsibilities. However, the information in these sections are not confined to one category, and in fact have much overlap.
In terms of my personal morals and standards, I believe that honesty is pivotal. Being honest in the stories shared, being genuine in my excitement, and being truthful in my opinions are all essential for a developing nature interpreter. Another standard that should be valued as a developing interpreter is safety. I believe that interpreters should ensure that their activities are relatively safe; the content in discussion is appropriate; and that the participants do not feel forced to participate in any activities.
Csikszentmihalyi’s Characteristics of Flow, discussed earlier this semester is relevant here, as interpreters must maintain flow, where the participants are neither anxious nor bored. As a developing nature interpreter, I intend on making the audience fully aware of the dangers of my presentation, but do not want to scare the participants. At the beginning of the semester, Chris mentioned that interpreters should avoid discussing personal fears, such as that of bugs or deep water. This should be avoided because revealing these negative thoughts may affect the opinions of the audience, cause fear, or worst of all, take away a potential spark.
In addition, an important personal ethic of mine involves respect. Analogous to the Golden Rule in world religions, which states “do to others what you want them to do to you”, I believe interpreters should treat audience members in the same way they would like to be treated (Islamic Networks Group). For instance, when the audience is asked to give input and share their ideas, their contributions should be respectfully considered and acknowledged, just as I would want.
A photograph of the Golden Rule in world religions (Islam Networks Group).
As a developing interpreter, I bring a variety of beliefs to the ways in which I interpret. I believe it is important to give people both time and space to process information, and to have few to zero expectations going into the interpretive walk. This will allow for a less structured program, encourage free flowing ideas and support unexpected detours. I also believe that it is perfectly okay to say “I am not entirely sure” in response to a question. Accepting that we can never know the answers to all the questions in life is truly liberating, and exhibits our human condition.
I also believe that preparation is important, but only to a certain extent. From my experience, usually the less rehearsed presentations flow more naturally, and the unexpected detours resonate most with the audience.
As both a 21-year old University of Guelph student and as a developing nature interpreter, I am aware of various responsibilities I have because of both moral and academic obligations. These responsibilities can be both easy and challenging to fulfill. An important responsibility of mine is conducting myself in a professional manner. The gift of professionalism presented by Beck & Cable, is helpful in proving to the audience that the guide is equipped and knowledgeable (Beck & Cable, 2011). I believe I have an important responsibility to ensure that the information I present is accurate and from reliable sources. Ensuring that information is accurate is morally just and imperative.
As a final responsibility, I believe that I have a duty to “leave no trace”, and to be a steward of the land. By interpreting nature following a “leave no trace” policy, may enlighten others about the significance of leaving the environment as it was originally, and may spark some interest in conservation.
The Spectrum of Environmental Ideologies
Environmental ideology is a way people think about the natural world to justify their actions towards it. An individual’s environmental ideology is a product of their values, attitudes, and actions towards the environment (Morgan, 2011). One practical way to order environmental ideologies is on a spectrum that represents a range of beliefs and human relationships with the natural world (Morgan, 2011).
A photograph of the spectrum of environmental ideologies. Retrieved from: https://prezi.com/bpas6kvdke5c/spectrum-of-environmental-ideologies/
Left: Human-centered AND Right: Nature –centered
On the left side of the spectrum, which is anthropocentric, the natural world and all its resources exist solely for human use. These resources are to be exploited and not be restrained or limited in any capacity. The left middle section, has a focus on conservationism, where resources are to be conserved for human use and enjoyment (Morgan, 2011).
On the middle right, these ideologies are more radical and move to a deeper questioning of the root causes of anti-environmental attitudes and behaviour, such as domination and exploitation. They are interested in animal rights and land-based ethics. On the far right, transformative ideologies are the focus. Here, nonhuman entities (plants, birds, invertebrates) have value that goes beyond utilitarian, scientific, aesthetic, or religious worth to possessing intrinsic value. On this side of the spectrum, humans are considered part of a biotic community (Morgan, 2011).
My ideologies resemble those close to the middle right section of this spectrum. I believe that environmental exploitation needs to be evaluated and limited for only essential resources. This ultimately positions me on a more nature-centered side, where I believe that it is our duty to protect nature. This spectrum is an accurate indicator of where I stand with my opinions on the environment, which consequently influences the way I interpret to my audience. These ideologies also affirm my moral responsibilities to leave no trace, and be a steward of the land. Where do you lie on the spectrum? And how does your environmental ideology affect your methods as a developing interpreter?
An image representing an anthropogenic lifestyle covering an ecocentric lifestyle. Retrieved from: https://permaculturenews.org/2017/04/12/people-really-care-environment/
Interpretation can be accomplished in many forms, such as through music, art, writing and much more. I have many years of experience film making, public speaking and as a member of the debate society. Through these experiences, I have gained many interpersonal skills, public speaking skills and have an aptitude to think on the spot. I believe that speaking out loud to an audience is an interpretive approach that best suits my interests, skills and experiences.
In order to select suitable approaches for interpretation, I had to reflect on what worked well for me during my Jane’s walk presentation. Interacting with the audience by asking questions, made me less nervous as a presenter, as well as gave me an idea of how engaged my audience was, allowing me to gauge whether I should elaborate further or to move on to another point. In terms of Beck and Cable’s gifts, I would like to approach interpretation in the future with a focus on giving the gift of wholeness, because I enjoy larger concept webs and the connectivity of information (Beck & Cable, 2011). I value this gift, because I believe it is important to discuss regional and global wholes, to bring the context of our discussion to other regions and to different scales.
Self as World and World as Self: The Eureka Effect of Interconnectedness. Retrieved from: https://fractalenlightenment.com/36352/issues/self-as-world-and-world-as-self-the-eureka-effect-of-interconnectedness
A final, yet critical, suitable approach for future interpretation would be to ensure that the locations I am interpreting interest me, and that I am passionate about the topic of discussion. This will make it easier to interpret with enthusiasm, which will in turn capture more interest.
Conclusively, I believe all that was mentioned above effectively synthesizes my beliefs, insights, ethics, personality and opinions that I have developed over the duration of this course. This course taught me more about myself than I anticipated, and has also highlighted some areas to improve on as an interpreter. Although I still have much to learn, practice and experience, I am not lost in my path as an emerging interpreter, but simply on my way.
An image of an open road, to demonstrate that I am on my way as a developing interpreter. Retrieved from: https://www.mikkolagerstedt.com/blog/2013/6/19/on-my-way
Beck, L., & Cable, T. T. (2011). The Gifts of Interpretation. Urbana, IL: Sagamore Publishing.
Islamic Networks Group (n.d). First Principles of Religion: Treat Others As You Would Like To Be Treated (The Golden Rule). Retrieved from: https://ing.org/first-principles-religion-the-golden-rule/
Morgan, N (2011, September 9). Environmental Writing. Retrieved from: https://writingeco.wordpress.com/2011/09/09/chapter-2-a-spectrum-of-environmental-ideologies/