Explore the fantasy worlds, books, and artwork of R.L. Douglas, including the immersive Globiuz and Stratius series, and its expanding lore.
I’ve been thinking a lot about what it actually means to limit AI—not in the sci‑fi sense, but in the very real, very practical sense of keeping humans at the center of the systems we build.
AI is getting faster, more capable, more confident. But it’s also missing the things we take for granted in ourselves: hesitation, moral intuition, the ability to learn from lived experience instead of pure optimization.
So the question isn’t “How do we stop AI from becoming too smart?” It’s “How do we make sure it doesn’t outrun the parts of humanity that matter?”
In my latest piece, I talk about why we need real boundaries: hardware limits, transparent public servers, adaptive laws, and models that embrace uncertainty instead of pretending they’re always right.
Not because AI is dangerous by default— but because unbounded systems drift. And if we don’t shape the limits now, we might end up living inside someone else’s logic.
Anyway, I’m curious how others feel about this. Where do you think the line should be?