I made this comic during the Abbott era, but it still speaks to the basic idea of why beating up on Aussies on Centrelink appeals to Libs.

Andulka
The Bowery Presents
occasionally subtle
Color Me Curious

titsay
$LAYYYTER
Cosimo Galluzzi
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
No title available
🪼
EXPECTATIONS

bliss lane
Xuebing Du
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
noise dept.
sheepfilms
The Stonewall Inn
No title available
Noah Kahan

oozey mess

seen from Canada

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from United States

seen from Russia

seen from TĂĽrkiye
seen from Indonesia
seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Singapore

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Gabon
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
@sympathyfortheplebs
I made this comic during the Abbott era, but it still speaks to the basic idea of why beating up on Aussies on Centrelink appeals to Libs.
That men do not learn very much from the lessons of history is the most important of all the lessons of history.
Aldous Huxley (via philosophybits)
Next time the mainstream media sneeringly dismiss the SNP and Plaid Cymru as those "nationalists", it's worth remembering that both parties voted 100% AGAINST air strikes in Syria. Just saying...
At least I know that my local MP voted against air strikes.
Words fail me about the result of the vote. Shame on them. Disgusting.
The selective kindness of rich, under-taxed people is an unacceptable response to systemic inequality.
Desmond Cole, “Good riddance to the tax-fleeing rich.” (via batarde)
Desmond Cole, words of wisdom
(via garconniere)
What Corbyn said vs what the media reports.
Get a rat and put it in a cage and give it two water bottles. One is just water, and one is water laced with either heroin or cocaine. If you do that, the rat will almost always prefer the drugged water and almost always kill itself very quickly, right, within a couple of weeks. So there you go. It’s our theory of addiction. Bruce comes along in the ’70s and said, “Well, hang on a minute. We’re putting the rat in an empty cage. It’s got nothing to do. Let’s try this a little bit differently.” So Bruce built Rat Park, and Rat Park is like heaven for rats. Everything your rat about town could want, it’s got in Rat Park. It’s got lovely food. It’s got sex. It’s got loads of other rats to be friends with. It’s got loads of colored balls. Everything your rat could want. And they’ve got both the water bottles. They’ve got the drugged water and the normal water. But here’s the fascinating thing. In Rat Park, they don’t like the drugged water. They hardly use any of it. None of them ever overdose. None of them ever use in a way that looks like compulsion or addiction. There’s a really interesting human example I’ll tell you about in a minute, but what Bruce says is that shows that both the right-wing and left-wing theories of addiction are wrong. So the right-wing theory is it’s a moral failing, you’re a hedonist, you party too hard. The left-wing theory is it takes you over, your brain is hijacked. Bruce says it’s not your morality, it’s not your brain; it’s your cage. Addiction is largely an adaptation to your environment. We’ve created a society where significant numbers of our fellow citizens cannot bear to be present in their lives without being drugged, right? We’ve created a hyper-consumerist, hyper-individualist, isolated world that is, for a lot of people, much more like that first cage than it is like the bonded, connected cages that we need. The opposite of addiction is not sobriety. The opposite of addiction is connection. And our whole society, the engine of our society, is geared towards making us connect with things. If you are not a good consumer capitalist citizen, if you’re spending your time bonding with the people around you and not buying stuff—in fact, we are trained from a very young age to focus our hopes and our dreams and our ambitions on things we can buy and consume. And drug addiction is really a subset of that.
Johann Hari, Does Capitalism Drive Drug Addiction? (via albinwonderland)
“How typical of a Tory, to think that something that doesn't generate huge wads of cash can't possibly be worthwhile.”
“ There's nothing this Government would love more than for artists and writers all over the country, to throw up their hands and say, "Well ok, I give up." It wants to squeeze the will to live from us, just like it wants to squeeze the lifeblood out of the poor, the disabled, and the vulnerable. Don't let them do it. You have the tools to resist! “
Great article! (also featured in the current issue of The Chapess zine from Synchronise Witches )
The crisis in civic agency is causing exponential damage. While most people believe that issues like human rights atrocities, widespread inequality, and ecological devastation are serious and deserve immediate attention, the average person does not believe they can do anything about them. We’ve lost incalculable energy, talent, and resources on solving complex problems because of the frustration, fatigue, and complacency that come from feeling overwhelmed and helpless.
Why We Need a Civic Imagination | Civicist (via anxiaostudio)
David Graeber: On the Phenomenon of Bullshit Jobs
Noah Surprise (there then), Private Eye
Tumblr struggles with ageism, probably because it can’t be oversimplified into “the good guys vs the oppressors.” Racism is a complex phenomenon, but most of the time we can still simplify it as “white oppressors vs POC oppressed.” Ageism spills out into all the directions - the young, the old and sometimes even the middle aged are all oppressed in various ways and it becomes even more complex when it interacts with misogyny, racism, homophobia, etc. So when you’re trying to encapsulate ageism into a snappy graphic, it just doesn’t work and I think because of that ageism gets interpreted as a “lesser” form of oppression, like it’s just not as important as racism or misogyny.
After the emergency budget was announced last week, a lot of people picked up on the fact that young people would be hit hardest. The right to housing benefit is gone, the right to education maintenance grants is gone and the minimum wage will not apply to under 25s. Meanwhile, children will be affected by changes to household benefit caps and tax credits. This will mean more children growing up in poverty, more young people forced to stay in abusive homes for longer, more young people with no educational route out of poverty and more young people who find that hard work by itself is not enough.
But if you point to the idea that young people are an oppressed group in their own right (even without taking race/gender/orientation into account), people kinda shrug and there isn’t the level of outrage you’d expect. Even plenty of young people themselves just seem resigned to it. In fact, many of the mainstream media outlets generally didn’t even pick up on this angle last week, with Robert Peston going so far to describe this as a “red” budget.
What people seem to miss is that oppression of young people links into just about every other social problem. It’s the reason nobody listened to children in Rochdale who came forward about sexual exploitation and it’s the reason that thousands of adults are only now coming forward about sexual abuse they suffered in childhood. It’s there in the fact that young people are overwhelmingly left-wing and yet the last 50 years of politics has been the story of right-wing governments judging young people and determining that Britain is “broken.” It’s there in the fact we encourage young people to want material success and then judge them for wanting an iPhone. It’s there in the fact that we are dismissive of young people who talk about their experiences of racism, sexism and homophobia. By ignoring ageism against young people, we reinforce every other kind of oppression.
But of course this is complicated by the fact that we also oppress older adults on the basis of their age. Many of today’s pensioners have spent decades paying into the welfare system only to learn that they must sell their houses to afford social care. We constantly talk of the ageing population as a “ticking timebomb,” reinforcing the idea that older adults are a burden and a problem we would prefer to be without. We tell older adults they will have to work longer to be comfortable in retirement, but simultaneously resent them for taking jobs away from younger people. And then we’re surprised when people dehumanise and abuse them. By de-valuing older adults, we reinforce every other kind of oppression.
So if you’re thinking you can just deal with politics by looking at the parties and the policies and leaving all the bigger societal stuff to one side, you’re underestimating how entrenched all this shit is. What unites young people and older adults? It’s their lack of economic power. They are less likely to work, more likely to need support and they have less spending power. It is because they are considered less valuable to a system that rates people on economic usefulness that we feel comfortable in ignoring them. And because young people can’t or won’t vote and older adults are generally fixed in their voting behaviours, politicians generally aren’t interested either.
I suppose my point here for anyone who is interested in social justice or oppression is that we need to wake the fuck up about ageism. Yes, it’s difficult to get thousands of notes on a topic where there are multiple oppressed groups. Yes, it’s hard to separate ageism out from misogyny and racism sometimes. But ageism is killing people just like those other problems are. We can’t shrug our shoulders and leave it just because you have to look a little harder to notice it’s there.
The more you know
I was about to start a big rant about how people feel they can influence politics in this country (or not). But then I decided rather than ranting at people, I could just ask them.
Here’s a survey for people living in Britain about how they feel about politics.Â
It would be brilliant if you could share this, reblog it, etc so I can get as wide an array of answers as possible. Honestly, I can’t pretend that I have a noble purpose for doing this, like an essay to write or something like that. I’m just interested in how people feel and what might actually help people feel that their political views actually count.