Do you agree with people when they say that Dany has no right to Iron throne?
Sorry, I haven’t reply to another question. I will give you my straight answer. No, I don’t agree with that concept because I feel for whom have studying the show in an obsessed way they totally have forgotten that people don’t “deserve” things just because they are good or noble.
If that would be the case probably in our world good people wouldn’t suffering or fighting for gain something on their favor.
If we equate suffering with “they deserve good things” they are totally forgetting how reality works. Often the people who accomplish something over the years fighting for it are the ones who owns something rather expecting miracles happen happen to you because you are good or you have suffered enough. Also in my perception is that the IT must Be conquest to have a right over it but I truly preferre Dany to survive rather that obtain a old iron chair.
Now if your question is about “rights” like legally rights? Hereby? Maybe you are referring to that. There is some nuance missing between book and show in which in the books we don’t know if Jon’s right to the throne is legal perse Since Aerys disowned Rhaegar and made Viserys his heir and he made Dany his heir so it’s a little more complex on that front.
On the show speaking she would be right behind Jon in terms of hereby. A thing that can provoke certain conflict but with a very easy solution by married each other.