Hey there, really liked the demo. This is just my opinion, but I found it really strange how everyone was so accepting of MC, you know a soldier who not so long ago fought on front lines, killed your knights, and you killed theirs, child of your enemy... Instead of thinking about them as of poor thing, shouldn't you think of them as potential danger? After all, it was not so uncommon to send your child to marry your enemy just to assassinate them and get rid of a leader. No suspicion at all?
Two factors are at play here: for one MC was not really that involved in the rebellion. They fought for their House only in the last two battles, and even then in the last one they was in the rear. All of this to say that they were on the field only because their House was desperate, otherwise they would have been left at home, ready to be married to some Irish heir when the rebellion was over.
Also, the ROs... well they don't exactly know MC fought against them, since MC really wasn't supposed to be on the field.
Even if MC was a danger to Arthur and wanted to assassinate him, what gain would they obtain by that? Everyone would know it was them, a new sovereign would be chosen and the Houses would, in turn for the betrayal, be stripped of the freedom they have left thanks to the peace treaty.