#*stark

[r-truth]

[thefirstknife]

Hot take but I'm enjoying the new matchmaking in Control and anyone who says otherwise is an elitist, I'm gonna die on this hill

I am a huge proponent of skill based matchmaking and hated when they announced its removal (in Arrivals). Crucible matchmaking was miserable for me from then until now, so I'm on board with this absolutely.

Today's TWAB also had some interesting statistics about the first week of skill based matchmaking being in Control:

In the first week of Season of Plunder, 140,000 more hours of Control had been played than in the first week of Season of the Haunted, and we had around an 11% increase in the total number of players playing Control. 

This is self evident, but clearly people play more Crucible (and they play more of it) when they aren't absolutely miserable in it. If Crucible is not geared towards the average player, the player pool will be too low and that is not sustainable for a healthy pvp experience. Average players are by far the biggest population of players.

Overall, our average matchmaking times went up by an average of 5 to 10 seconds. That's a good indication that the matching is generally working but isn't showing our worst cases—the lower population segments (extreme low and high skill). 

For the highest skill band, less than 0.1% of the population, matchmaking times average around 90 seconds during high population times, spiking to just over 200 seconds at low population times. For the lowest skill band, we see matchmaking times between 120 seconds at best and 240 seconds at worst. 

Obviously this increased matchmaking time, but the increase is negligible on average. It gets "high" only for 0.1% of the population on either end of the spectrum which, as frustrating as that may be for the 0.1% of the players, it's not something that should dictate how the other 99.9% play. At worst, the matchmaking time was 4 minutes, for the lowest skill bracket. This is far from a huge disaster people like to make it out to be (I've played games where matchmaking could be 20 minutes on average).

The skill differences we see in Control matches are pretty stark. Without SBMM, only 10% of matches had 600 or less skill difference between the highest and lowest players. With SBMM on, we see that 80% of games have that separation or less.

If you ever think you're making things up or elitists gaslight you, they are wrong. This isn't the first time they showed how much difference there is between skill. Games are now provably and evidently more uniform in terms of who you play with and who you play against. It should be extremely rare to get into a lobby with someone vastly above you or below you in skill. Which is how it should be. Huge skill difference between players in a single lobby has always felt bad in either direction for me: I don't like being stomped and I don't like stomping others. I would rather sit in menus matchmaking for 2 minutes instead of loading into a match that ends just as quickly and that makes me feel miserable.

If your games seem more balanced, it's because they are. If they felt horribly balanced before, it's because they were.

Mercy games are down 4%. Not as much as we had hoped, but it has been shrinking a little day by day. 

Also interesting! They added some extra info about this which is also cool to explore, but basically there is less mercy games and they expect that to go lower still.

As far as score and kill differences, we see a similar set of incremental improvements. Games where the best player had 30+ kills more than the worst player went from 9% of games to 2%. Games where the best player had only 10 to 19 more kills than the worst player went from 35% of games to 55%. 

Another good piece of info that makes me feel less like I've just been insane for 2 years and angry about elitists trying to convince me that I am insane. Clearly I am not (or rather, I am not insane about this at least). I was sick and tired of games like this. Where two people in the lobby on each team are duking it out and I'm basically an NPC on the field with 3 kills because I die as soon as I spawn so the top players can have 57 kills.

We have seen one worrying trend in the data: the percentage of players quitting before the end of the match has risen from 8% to 12% in the last week. This is especially bad with matches designed to be balanced with 12 equally skilled players. We are still investigating to see if this is localized to a specific cohort or playstyle, or if this is a natural player reaction to a new system. This percentage  may reduce over time. Stay tuned!  

Finally, this piece of info. Bungie is obviously still investigating this and the most logical reason for this situation is now that connection based matchmaking is gone, people may be getting disconnected or may be leaving if their match is laggy.

However, my first thought (and one of Bungie's thoughts!) was that people are leaving games because they don't want to bother playing if they can't stomp new lights in Control. I genuinely think this and I will continue to believe that is the primary reason for leavers, due to my extensive experience with other competitive pvp games and modes, until Bungie proves me otherwise. People who are used to getting everything they want and stomping over lower skilled players get VERY upset when that is taken from them and when they have to play against people of their own skill level and be faced with the reality that maybe they just aren't that good and were just shooting fish in a barrel. These people tend to be the most salty leavers I have ever seen in any video game. I do honestly believe this accounts for most people leaving matches.

Got a bit long, but your ask was a nice opportunity to dive into some of this from the TWAB! Hopefully things get better and better as we go forward.

[shit-mcu-stans-write]

so idk if you’ve seen spiderman nwh yet but this submission contains a p big spoiler but i saw this and am just in awe of how wrong this is

(as if andrew garfield spider-man wouldn’t IMMEDIATELY kick stark in the balls kdlskfnfl. tobey’s would too!! sometimes i wonder if im even watching the same movie as some of the ppl who get these takes djskdbdn)

---

first of all, didn't we establish in no way home that stark doesn't exist in tobey and andrew's universes? for one thing, neither of them knew what the avengers was, and for another, they (including the villains) didn't recognize stark tech (suit and arc reactor). so like. how would andrew know to address him as mr stark

second, let's go over ages. raimi's spider-man came out in 2002 and peter turned 18 at the end of it, so he was born in 1984. similarly, since tasm came out in 2012 and peter was 17, he would've been born in 1995. no way home takes place in 2024, making tm's peter 40 and ag's peter 29 (although because of the snap, th's peter is 16 instead of 21, which means that tm and ag may be 35 and 24 respectively - we're not quite sure how the spell worked)

in any case, disregarding their ages, they don't need to be adopted by stark (of all people!!!!!)

[worstrper]

illbringthechaosmagic​:

Wanda stopped dead in the hall, taking a deep breath in. She should have known that it wasn’t going to be so easy, that they would end up having some form of conversation about the fact that she was injured.

“My leg,” she replied, turning around to face him. “Just got into a little fight was all. Nothing serious.” That might have been another white lie but she wasn’t about to let him worry about her.

“What are you still doing up anyways? I thought everyone would have been asleep.”

“Oh, you haven’t heard?”

Tony’s mouth ticks up, and despite the small, Pepper-esque voice in the back of his mind that claims self-preservation, he sets his smoothie down and hops off the stool by the kitchen counter.

“The lack of sleep’s about a quarter of the reason I go to therapy.” A moment, as he makes a face. “Honestly, maybe an eighth. I don’t really keep track. That’s what the therapist’s for.”

He doesn’t approach her, but he does lean against the entrance to the hall, arms crossed over his chest.

“Better to get that looked at now before it heals weird, you know. I got punched by the big guy once and my jaw still clicks when I yawn.

“Doesn’t even have to be by me. You could ask Friday to give it a scan in your room.”

[danganronpaprideicons]

Demigirl and Demiboy Ryota (via @bastart13) icons for anon! I hope you like how these turned out! Please reblog if you use one of these!

-Mod Rantaro

[cavetigrim]

OOC:: even if kipling didn’t intend it, a lot of his characters take on a lot more nuance simply because they don’t alway say “nice things” even if they’re supposed to be good people.Raksha and Bagheera and tbh most of mowgli’s allies are good, loyal characters, but living in the jungle has made them ableist af. And, tbh, if the text skirted around the issue of how khan’s disability directly affects how other jungle inhabitants see him (you know, the way Serkis’ movie does), it would make both Khan and the world Kipling created far more one-dimensional than they are.

Even good people suck sometimes. Good writing reflects that.

[r-truth]