2021\2024

seen from Malaysia
seen from Belarus
seen from France
seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Belarus
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Italy

seen from Spain
seen from Mauritius
seen from China
seen from China
seen from Italy
seen from France
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
2021\2024
Oslo chair by Angell, Wyller & Aarseth for Bernhardt Design
Euronymous Drinking 🦇💀 . . . . . . . . . . #euronymous #euronymousmayhem #mayhem #theblackcircle #oysteinaarseth #aarseth #mayhemband #helvete #dark #theblackcircle #thetruemayhem #blackmetal #metal #rock #oscuro #metalero #ritual #satanic #øystein #rockstar #venom #bathory #scream https://www.instagram.com/p/CQAU6WUBHjb/?utm_medium=tumblr
cybertext shifts the focus from the traditional threesome of author/sender, text/message, and reader/receiver to the cybernetic intercourse between the various part(icipant)s in the textual machine
- Aarseth (1997)
09.02.16, Aarseth
Aarseth compares the differences between a reader of traditional literature and a reader of cybertext. His comparisons were pretty spot on, because it shows the differences between traditional literature and cybertext. He also talks about cybertext can be mistaken for something less useful by the critics, but makes a pretty great argument for it. On page 3, he says "cybertext is a machine for the production of variety of expression." This is an easy way to explain that cybertext is no less important and thought-provoking just because it does not fit traditoonal standards. I think his idea of helping people understand by giving them a chance to experience cybertext is also a really smart idea. The only problem then would be: how do we ensure that everyone who experiences cybertext is able to experience it in a way that makes it easy to understand as a concept?