Firms sign up to tourism programme for guests with extra needs An online programme is to help tourism industry workers cater for people with extra needs, such as the elderly…
seen from China
seen from Kyrgyzstan

seen from Malaysia

seen from Kyrgyzstan

seen from Netherlands
seen from Iraq

seen from United States
seen from India
seen from Israel
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from France
seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye
seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
Firms sign up to tourism programme for guests with extra needs An online programme is to help tourism industry workers cater for people with extra needs, such as the elderly…
A clarification of my accessibility policy re:Trigger Warnings
I will add trigger warnings where appropriate, unless I have reason to believe it would be seen as disrespectful to a person I respect.
If the post is about a marginalization I share, I will not reblog it if I suspect that adequately using trigger warnings would be disrespectful.
If it is about one I do not have, and I'm thinking specifically of race here, if PoC don't think it needs trigger warnings, I'm not going to, as a white person, be putting trigger warnings on their experiences, unless I am specifically asked toby PoC. And, because I do not experience racism, because I am privileged by racism, I am obligated to oppose it (in this case, by signal-boosting). So I don't have the option that I have for my own marginalizations to simply not reblog things.
Oppressive bullshit like cis women claiming that trans women are rapists can still get trigger warned for, because I'm not going to defer to my oppressor's judgement as to whether or not a trigger warning is respectful. This doesn't apply in discussions of things where I am the oppressor. Specifically, anti-ableism is not a weapon to be used for white people to silence PoC with, and I will not use it as one.