Attempting to fill the gap...failed
As we further validate our proposition, the gaps we need to fill...were some sort of an illusion. We continued to interview and asked about their daily lives as farmers, what crops they grow and stuff. These information we gathered were enough for us to conclude what functions we need to include to our product. It went wrong because we did not really grasp the problem they have at that point. We are still on the preliminary stages, or “knowing each other” stage. We continued to put function that may or may not be needed to them. If you look at it, It sounds like we were the one deciding what problems they were suffering as how this validation process develops. Looking back, validation of our product should focus on the costumers and not the product. As what I’ve learned on class that a product exist when there’s a costumer and not the other way around. We could’ve further inquire their specific struggles as a farmer and not just as a person. We could’ve ask more about their technical difficulties and what problems that needs to addressed immediately. These action may lead us to better understanding their hardships and passion as a farmer.










