neither mark nor matthew have any drama when read out of order.
mark first is so down to earth, it hits close to a work of 20th century absurdism, reminding me most of camus' stranger. this allows matthew's revision to shine as the glitzy hollywood sequel it is, having a totally different sense of humor and tragic pathos, losing none of its sophistication as a magical text.
far from merely being rhetorical, the delivery is highly sarcastic. nobody understands jesus.
reading matthew first, it seems like a fairy tale. you have no rooting in jesus' humanity. reading mark second, it feels like something's missing.












