Looking for spirits, Part 2: gods lost in translation and time
I had a thought the other day, that maybe trying to match our gnostic observations to an established deity’s name/profile isn’t the way to go. The spirits of this world aren’t some sort of magic bingo card.
Least of all it seems expedient trying to check boxes based on descriptions that are several generations old and have been distorted by cultural and religious influences. It’s basically inevitably setting ourselves up for ascribing traits to deities in the same way that fandoms ascribe traits to canon characters. Eventually they’re unrecognizable fanon versions of themselves because of an inexplicable need to stick to established names instead of daring to describe something new. Could you imagine shoving all newly discovered species of butterfly into a box with the already established ones, just because they all have common traits such as wings and emerging from caterpillars? If that sounds like a reductive thing to do to the physical world, why are people so keen on doing it to the metaphysical?
Not to mention that for every deity that is remembered and worshipped by modern heathens, there are countless that have been forgotten about. It's simply not sufficient to reduce the intense animistic complexity of the world to a few preserved accounts of local deities from the Scandinavian countries.
Maybe it’s time to sweep out the old dust and open our minds to a fresh start. The pagan ancestors also started somewhere, after all. Someone, somewhere, first came up with the name “Odin”, and all the names for the rest of the pantheon we remember today. Isn’t heathenry also about exploring the realms of the spiritual unknown? Isn’t it supposed to be immanent? Then why linger in the past? If we just limit ourselves to fossil records, we are blinding ourselves to the present and might as well start calling the Edda our bible.













