Move over, other reading plans, I am now all about Broke of the Shannon and the War of 1812, edited by Tim Voelcker. I love Captain Broke, but this book is covering so much more?! From Andrew Lambert’s contribution to the book ("Sideshow? British Grand Strategy and the War of 1812″):
In 1813, British strategists had few options. They had to maintain the naval and economic blockades, to deny the American cruisers and privateers access to the sea, and ruin the American treasury; but limited military manpower meant that anything beyond holding the Canadian frontier, the dominant military effort, and Admiral Cockburn’s brilliant, small-scale, high-tempo raiding on the Chesapeake was simply impossible. Too many troops were tied down in West Indies garrisons, ostensibly against the improbable risk of an American attack, but in reality to calm the nerves of politically powerful planters, fearful of slave uprisings.
The political weight of the West Indies remained strong: the Ministry depended on the planters’ votes, and their profits, remitted in specie, to retain political power and fund the European war until Napoleon had been defeated. Strategy to fight America was bound by chains of sugar and gold to the defence of West Indian commercial and territorial power. [...] The British would not risk the sugar islands for some fleeting advantage on the mainland.
wowowow everyone is evil in this conflict!!! there are no good guys here!!! It’s all blood money from enslaved people all the way down!!! ...I mean, yes I was aware of this (even Nelson had connections to West Indies slavery), but to the extent that it was really protecting enslavers in the West Indies that made the British pull their punches in the War of 1812, and not the Napoleonic Wars, damn.