What are the Pros and Cons of Automation Testing?
Pros of automation testing:
Effective collaboration is established by developers: Collaboration between developers can be made more effective through the tactical use of automated testing platforms. When a suite of computerized tests are put in place, developers can focus and work on other key testing activities
Increased efficiency: Developer productivity can be increased by automating tasks. For example, the results of your automated tests can be automatically executed and monitored by configuring your continuous integration (CI) system. This shows that there is an increase in efficiency toward scaling the testing and development process.
Enhanced scalability: Automated testing can be easily scaled to accommodate evolving testing requirements and growing software projects. Whether it’s adapting to changes in the application, integrating with other tools or adding new test cases, automated testing frameworks offer the scalability and functionality to meet the varied requirements of the software development process.
Leveraging speed and efficiency: There can be many test cases that can be easily executed by the automated testing company and that too in just a few seconds or minutes. This will in turn ensure rapid feedback loops, so that the issues can be identified and rectified promptly by developers. This will in turn help in optimizing the process of software development life cycle.
Cons of automation testing:
Manual testing cannot be replaced completely: There will be many scenarios in the testing and development realm, wherein automated testing cannot be completely replaced by the manual testing. This is because exploratory testing, ad hoc testing and user acceptance testing that are manual testing techniques play a crucial role in the software development and testing process.
The issue with maintenance overhead: Regular updates are required by the automated test scripts platform in order to make them effective and relevant.
The cost of setting up automated test environments are quite high: The initial costs to set up an automation testing environment are quite high and hence expecting Return on Investment in the early stages of testing and development would be futile.
The issue with false positives / negatives: False positives or negatives can be produced by the automated testing platform, which, in turn, leads to inaccurate test results.
