#benophie!!

[legionnaireslover]

Wimbledon 2026 - cuteness overload!!

Sophie and BC attended this year's Wimbledon!

I see Sophie is wearing a dress she has worn before - at James Rhodes' wedding celebration a few years ago.

[legionnaireslover]

Aren't They Lovely!

They look so relaxed with each other. So happy. It's wonderful.

Of course we can expect some more BS from people like @aeltrileaf and @beyer_chri50076.

They just hate it when REALITY smacks their narrative in the face! They'll call Sophie names and insult her work. They'll claim BC's sick looking and faking his love for Sophie. They'll say she's ruined his career.

And everything they say are lies and delusional thinking.

I just love it when BC and Sophie just pop up together looking so radiant. It obviously drives the Haters crazy!

[legionnaireslover]

View this post on Instagram

He is so gracious and humble that he takes the extra time to thank all his colleagues at SunnyMarch even though this is an acting award for him! Lovely, lovely man who is on a roll professionally and personally (with his lovely wife and family)! Congrats to him!

[legionnaireslover]

So, just how many people are in on this so-called “sham”????

This is an excerpt of an interview that appeared on today’s (Nov. 1/2017) CBS News site -

“As Elbow were working on their new album, "Little Fictions," Garvey met his new bride, Rachael Stirling, at actor Benedict Cumberbatch's wedding.

"Benedict invited me to his wedding, and there was only him that I knew there, but I bought a really nice suit thinking, 'I might meet somebody at the wedding,' and I did. I met Rachael," he said.”

And I guess the question to Haters is this - if this whole thing is FAKE, then how come so many people (including this latest comment from Garvey, but it is a long and growing list) have confirmed that indeed BC did marry Sophie? As well, there is another long, long list of people from far and wide who have confirmed (not guessed, rumoured or imagined, mind you but CONFIRMED) that they have seen his child(ren). People like Tilda S., Scott D., Amanda A., Mark G., Sue V., Mads M., Tom H., Louise B., etc. all have talked about either his wedding or his children from personal experiences. And this doesn’t even count the larger number of reputable journalists who have mentioned his family or directly quoted him talking about his wife and family. Are they all liars?

I not even mentioning the hundreds of tweets from regular people who have seen Sophie and Ben together doing normal, everyday things (sometimes as a couple and sometimes with their children). Sure some of these might be fakes but not all of them. And according to the hater everyone, every last single one, of these tweets that mention Sophie, Ben and/or their two children, are FAKE, FAKE, FAKE!!!

So, is that mention by Garvey “FAKE” as well? Was he just talking to a CBS reporter today and in the middle of an interview decided “Hey, I think I’ll just toss in a lie about going to Cumberbatch’s wedding so his gullible fans will continue to think he is married!”

Sounds ridiculous right? But the Haters are trying to sell that, believe it or not!

It doesn’t matter that all these folks are well-known people (who have reputations of their own to protect). If they mention anything about Sophie or Ben’s family, the Haters expect everyone to believe that it is a fabrication and whoever is being quoted is just following “sham protocol” and lying to cover up that BC’s marriage and family are faked because Disney/Marvel isn’t ready to announce the “split”!

Please don’t ask me to explain exactly WHY anyone would do this... because I can’t. I just simply can’t. But I am sure one of the Septic/Haters can - it probably will have something to do with astral charts, some “top secret” Panama Papers article that was all set to expose Eeeevil Sophie™ but then just mysteriously didn’t get published, or some “blackmail/human trafficking/drug ring” mafia connection... you know, “fuckery”!!!

[legionnaireslover]

QUESTION OF THE DAY: So, is Thoroughlyskeptic just uneducated or is she is just so stupid that she can’t count?

Found this on T-skeptic’s blog today...

“https://www.theguardian.com/music/2015/oct/31/guy-garvey-interview-solo-album-elbow

http://archive.is/6SadO

“Eight months” dated in October”

And I guess the “Eight months” in quotes is supposedly her way of questioning the recent quotes from Garvey that he met Rachel at BC and Sophie’s wedding February 15, 2015.

You see the interview from the Guardian that she “referenced” is dated October 31/15 and says -

“It’s eight months since Garvey got together with Rachael Stirling, Diana Rigg’s daughter, and a fine actor in her own right. Yes, he says, things are working out very nicely, thank you. That’s why he’s spending so much time in London. You sense he still can’t believe his luck, and sounds positively giddy about his “sweetheart”.

So T-skeptic is trying (I suppose) to prove that the wedding is FAKE because according to her, Garvey couldn’t have met Stirling “eight months” ago from that interview.

She probably counted the months “past” as February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September and October (which totals 9 months) so to her it looked like they met in March to make it the stated 8 months past of the interview (and of course that would mean that their meeting at BC’s wedding would be a lie).

Trouble is, allowing for a couple of weeks of drag time between the actual interview and the publication, it turns out that the February wedding time line of “eight months” for Stirling and Garvey meeting is completely spot on - as stated in that interview!

You see the problem here is that T-skeptic CAN’T COUNT!!!

Because even elementary school children know that you don’t count the initial month when counting time PAST! Counting the month of February as the first month is like saying an infant is 1 year old on the day it was born. You are only 1 year old AFTER the full first year is past.

So when you meet someone on February 15th you count that you have known them one month on MARCH 15th, two months on APRIL 15th, three months on MAY 15th, four months on JUNE 15th, five months on JULY 15th, six months on AUGUST 15th, seven months on SEPTEMBER 15th and (drum roll please) EIGHT MONTHS ON OCTOBER 15th!!!!!

So there is no conflict whatsoever with Garvey’s October 31/15 statement that he met Stirling eight months prior, with the recent interview in which he states that he met her at Benedict Cumberbatch’s WEDDING on February 15/15.

Honestly someone should take pity on T-skeptic and send her a mathematics primer! Isn’t she the septic who couldn’t do simple math about some other issue as well??? It had something to do with ADDING didn’t it???? Maybe someone remembers it exactly because I just have the vaguest memory of it and can’t remember the specifics. But then there have been SO MANY lies and stupidity that have come out of the Septics’ mouths one can’t be expected to remember them all, I suppose!!!

[legionnaireslover]

They want you to believe in lies...

The Haters are always trying their best to get other fans to believe in their delusions, their lies. Take for example the lie that Sophie isn’t around. This is something they keep spouting constantly (except when she is seen and then they accuse her of “famewhoring” and “seeking out the camera”). They want you to believe that she invisible from Ben’s life. Everytime BC is mentioned in a tweet or a sighting if Sophie isn’t mentioned as well (which is rare because she isn’t a celebrity - she is someone who married a celebrity) the Haters claim she isn’t there. They have, of course, been burned on this because sometimes they get hold of a sighting and immediately go ape-shit about “Where’s Sophie?” “Where’s the wife?” “Why isn’t she there?” And then comes the inevitable claim that is she was truly married to him there would be evidence that she was with him and this PROVES his marriage is a FAKE!!! But then sometimes suddenly people post a pic/video that shows she was there, which always leaves the Haters sputtering about how much of a famewhore she is and how fake her smile was and how ugly her dress is, etc. (yeah, they are THAT immature!). The latest example was at the Q&A session for TCiT. They ranted on and on about why wasn’t she supporting him that night, and how come she wasn’t in any of the photos! And then it turns out there were 2 (yes, TWO) pics of her with him that night! One was a shot of them coming out of the actual building and the other was a fan vid showing them crossing the street together. Hah!

The other example of this comes from this past August when the Wilderness Festival was on. At first the photos all just showed BC at the festival with other performers and of course the haters jumped on it with remarks of how wonderful he looked (because he has dumped Sophie) and how it is great to see to see him without her and how this was again evidence that he was truly separated from her grip. And of course, there then came all the video evidence that she was there!!! All along - there supporting his performance, there enjoying all the festivities right there beside him all along! Well, the big-mouth haters had a LOT of backtracking to do what with all the pro-Cumberbatch statements before they knew of the pictorial proof that Sophie was with BC throughout the festival! Some just got bitter and said they were done with him (because he looked like he was accepting his marriage!). Some (like the Annashitter crew) tried to say it WASN’T her FOR SURE because the pix were BLURRY! And until it was 100% clear and verifiably her they were just going with it wasn’t her! How convenient for them! That way even though there were multiple pictures from multiple people and multiple angles, nothing short of a crystal clear video in HD would be accepted by them so they could go on with their lying and just tell people that it wasn’t true that she was seen with him at that time.

The mountain of evidence to the contrary never was talked about and never given any weight. Each piece of evidence was dismissed on its own and the lie was maintained.

I guess the Wilderness Festival event is coming back to me now because of the presence of a new BTS video put out by the Wilderness people themselves about Letters Live and... yup, you guessed it - Sophie is clearly seen on the video supporting Ben in his performance, cheering him on and standing near him when he was being interviewed on camera.

But the haters still keep on lying and acting like there will always be a lot of doubt that she was there. They state this as a fact and use it to further their agenda of hate towards Ben and Sophie. And they can spread this lie of theirs, along with all their other lies to try and hook unsuspecting people into their bizarre world where Ben and Sophie’s marriage and family are doubted.

Shameful and disgusting but this is the world the Haters live in.

[legionnaireslover]

Oh, Haters... Here’s one more person you can add to your “On Team Sophie’s Payroll” conspiracy list!

Aparently The Sun Inn in Hulverstone (Ben’s favourite pub) just won the “Beer and Buses Award” as the top voted pub on the Isle of Wight! Here’s the link to the story -

www.iwcp.co.uk/news/news/benedict-cumberbatchs-favourite-isle-of-wight-pub-wins-beer-and-buses-award-317374.aspx

And there’s a comment from one of the co-owners (after some other poster made a snarky remark about BC not being a “regular”)...

by Vicky Hartley

4th December 2017, at 17 29

It doesn't say he is a regular however he spent a lovely afternoon in the pub a few weeks ago with friends and family.

“With friends and family”... more “nanfiction”???? Or just maybe the owner of the pub has actually seen BC and his family in her pub???? Hmm, who’s telling the truth???

No contest!!! I’m going to go with the person who actually lives in the UK, on the IOW, and NOT some butthurt, loser wankers who just can’t get over the fact that their “fav” married someone they didn’t “approve” of!!!