so i think this op blocked me so im replying like this because people don't wanna have meaningful discussions no more 😭
1. "transmen" in that connotation (aka without space) is a terf thing
2. "female homosexuality" implies females. and scientifically?? like animals??? we're talking about queer attraction here. a lot of trans women and intersex women don't consider themselves "females" and using this definition to define lesbianism is completely wrong, as it's been defined as "queer attraction to women" or simply "attraction to women" for decades. why are you using science to define queer attraction?? that's a little odd.
3. we didn't start using the "nonman" definition until lesbian separatism, which INCLUDED bisexual women. despite your definition of bi lesbian being "two nonman genders," that's not correct and bisexuals can and do have attraction to men
4. why are you focusing on my point on "female homosexuality" when i said nonman was racist and dehumanizes black people, it is not and NEVER WAS transphobic to call trans men lesbian, as they (me included) do it on their own accord. it isn't misgendering them because they are still men. if your main argument is misgendering men, it's completely wrong because lesbians who are men are still men
5. even if you don't like men, you shouldn't let that dictate whether men can be lesbians. being a misandrist doesn't do anything materially for women and lesbians and it's not revolutionary nor helpful. excluding men from lesbianism isn't activism either, it's just unnecessary and needless exclusion.
