I'll respond to the specific parts that I was called out in but for the original post you can click here. It's under a different username but I'm sure you're all familiar with the popular Cablepool blog cablexdeadpool
As you admitted, you are biased, and I think that bias has given you a skewed view of my blog. I am not anti-Cable. For years I have consistently talked shit about him, mainly because I am an old school X-Men fan and ranting about the Summer's family is a subsequent hobby many of us develop despite our love for them, but I like the ship. Shit talking about these characters is something I do, and I've been far worse to Spiderman despite your assumptions. My comments on Cable have always been that he's an annoying killjoy but I have spent many hours arguing that Spiderman is a self-centered asshole who sells babies to the devil; I popularly have argued that against the Deadpool editor.
I have stated that a relationship with Cable is abusive just as I have stated that a relationship with Spiderman is abusive. Cable is controlling and manipulative and their relationship seems to be based on daddy issues. Spiderman is self-centered, judgmental, ableist, and Deadpool objectifies him (sexually, yes, but mostly as a hero who should not have any faults)
Other things I often state: I only like problematic ships and my ideal partner for Deadpool would be Copycat which I have said even long before the movie was in production
This blog is unequivocally Spideypool heavy but that's not because of a personal preference, it's simply that I post every new fan work daily and in recent years Spideypool is more popular. I've been able to post a lot more Cablepool which I've been excited about but in a perfect world I would be able to post a lot more fanart of him with Taskmaster, Wolverine, Captain America, even Sauron. Not to say that I don't love Spideypool, the fan comics are always very funny and I enjoy them a lot.
The original essay was very much in response to homophobic messages I was getting when I started this blog. Instead of answering each message I made one post I could link to and over time the homophobia died down but the post continued to be popular because it was informative so I retrofitted it to be more so but it definitely holds remnants of its original intention.
That being said, my argument was never that if you don't believe Deadpool is pansexual you are a homophobe, although I do argue that if you think Deadpool is completely straight you at least have some internalized homophobia.
As for me purporting that Deadpool can only be read as pansexual, that isn't true. When I was originally asked what is sexual orientation was I picked pansexual because we know he loves women, we know he loves men, and we know he's capable of loving a space hippo so pansexual seemed the most fitting although omnisexual would have worked as well. I have no problem with people identifying him as bisexual because the definitions of all of these terms are being redefined by many communities and if you are definition of bisexuality includes loving space hippo's falls under bisexuality, then he is also clearly bisexual.
I have also acknowledged and try to mention as much as possible that in canon Deadpool does not identify as anything besides "not straight" which I think is exceedingly important. Deadpool rejecting labels is the best editorial decision, in my opinion, and fans to interpret him as pansexual or bisexual can just as easily identify with him. He is still queer representation.
Your post disappoints me because I've been excited by all the new Cablepool material and that a lot of Spideypool fans have been expanding their repertoire and you seem to be instigating a rekindling of this fandom argument that appeared to be waning; that being, Spideypool makes no sense and whoever doesn't love Cablepool obviously hasn't read the comics which reeks of the "fake fangirl" rhetoric