Assessment Task One: Conceptual Mapping
First of all, what is a map? I see a map as a form of communication that allows for someone to find direction or follow a particular path when using it. With this in mind, I responded strongly to the focus of communication. And how on a conceptual level, we communicate our ideas, and what these ideas mean to other people. My map, is therefore a visual progress of my insight into ‘communication.’
On a basic note, one would consider verbal communication, language. Yet as we think deeper, observe, one can denote the significance of hand gestures, posture, a smile, body language and already our thoughts begin to expand. Much like the work of Guy Debord, associated with PsychoGeography (“the study of the precise laws and specific effects of the geographical environment, consciously organised or not, on the emotions and behaviour of individuals”). Also in relation to the Situationist International movement, who used mapping to visually reflect peoples relationship with their environment.
Erik Brunetti, also influenced by the Situationist International movement, integrates an element of risk into his work that are heavily politically motivated. His work Lost (Black Female) is a collection of ‘lost’ cat and dog flyers gathered for over a decade whilst writing graffiti. This work maps his location, and again uses the flyers as a means to communicate- in this case loss, desperation and love. As this is the basis of my influence, I have used these original Situationist International related images as the background for my conceptual map.
Visually influenced by Rauchenberg, the incorporation of objects as well as images and mixed media allows for me to identify the conceptual significance of objects in relation to ‘communication.’ This ability to communicate and connect is inherent in us all. I feel this can be represented in the visual simplicity, yet unassumingly complex relationship with an object. And as I explore these objects, discern why we choose to associate with some more than others.
Let me go through some examples. A bag perhaps, why does this person choose to wear this? Why is this feminine? Why is it useful? Why is it comfortable?
Or a water bottle, as something we need. Yet what does it represent or ‘communicate’? Anxiety, stress, drought, relief, nourishment, beauty, plastic, petroleum…
With reference to Joseph Koseth, in particular his work One and Three Chairs the inclusion of images of objects as well descriptions of these objects is also evident in my map. In Koseth’s work, the description, image and the actual chair each present ways of interpreting an object. In essence, one must consider why we can relate these three entirely different things, the object, image and description, as each being related to ‘a chair.’
Alleviated by this concept, the map recognises the significance of humans and their ability to communicate in this complex way. Much like the use of communication within Kruger’s graphic design like images, particularly her use of words, as well as Boranga’s sculptures with mouths, the map considers communication and it’s significant relationship with the human form.
The final outline of the figure over the collage, infers a crime scene. Metaphorically referencing the collaboration of evidence in order to find the solution. As artists, we must be the detectives. It is the collaboration of all these images and ideas that make up this image of ‘communication’, and in doing so, create my conceptual map.
Research Referencing-
http://urbanculturalstudies.wordpress.com/2012/03/22/urban-voices-the-situationists-psychogeography-and-drift/
http://lizlangstaff.blogspot.com.au/2011/11/situationists-international.html
http://mappingweirdstuff.wordpress.com/2009/06/14/mapping-weird-stuff-psychogeography/