#constitutionofindia

[framefeatures]

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Frame Features (@framefeatures1)

[jitendraharde]

[25/11, 8:13 am] JitendraDas Harde: ⚡#MeatEatersViolate_LawOfGod जीव हत्या महापाप काटा कूटी जो करै, ते पाखंड को भेष। निश्चय राम न जानहीं, कहैं कबीर संदेस।। कबीर परमेश्वर ने कहा है कि जो पशु को मारकर उसकी देह काटा करते हैं वह सब पाखंडी हैं। परमात्मा के विधान को नहीं जानते। [28/11, 9:02 am] JitendraDas Harde: #meateatersviolate_lawofgod #constitutionofindia #indianconstitution #constitution_of_supremegod https://www.instagram.com/p/CWzlORhoN06/?utm_medium=tumblr

[jitendraharde]

⚡#MeatEatersViolate_LawOfGod जीव हत्या महापाप काटा कूटी जो करै, ते पाखंड को भेष। निश्चय राम न जानहीं, कहैं कबीर संदेस।। कबीर परमेश्वर ने कहा है कि जो पशु को मारकर उसकी देह काटा करते हैं वह सब पाखंडी हैं। परमात्मा के विधान को नहीं जानते। #meateatersviolate_lawofgod #constitutionofindia #indianconstitution #constitution_of_supremegod https://www.instagram.com/p/CWzgPljI3V9/?utm_medium=tumblr

[insightfultake]

Serving the Chair, Not the Constitution: High Court’s Scathing Rebuke of UP Police

Can a police force remain impartial when careers depend on political loyalty? A sharp Allahabad High Court ruling raises troubling questions about governance.

[shoneekapoor-blog]

Daughter-In-Law vs Parents-in-Law Property Disputes Not Within Exclusive Jurisdiction Of Family Court: Delhi High Court

Can a daughter-in-law stop eviction by calling every property dispute a “shared household” issue? Delhi High Court has now made an important clarification that may impact many families facing long-running property battles.

PROPERTY DISPUTES NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court has ruled that ownership disputes between in-laws and a daughter-in-law over a self-acquired property cannot automatically be treated as matrimonial disputes just because the parties are related through marriage.

Justice Amit Sharma observed that property ownership rights exist independently from marital relationships and such disputes can be decided by ordinary civil courts instead of Family Courts.

The matter started after a mother-in-law filed a suit seeking mandatory and permanent injunction against her son and daughter-in-law regarding a property which she claimed was her self-acquired property. She told the court that the couple were only licensees staying on the second floor of the house and sought directions for them to vacate the premises.

Read Also: Atul Subhash vs Judge Aman vs Twisha Sharma: Is Justice Different For Men And Women?

The daughter-in-law challenged the maintainability of the case before the civil court. She argued that since the dispute arose from a matrimonial relationship, the matter should be heard only by the Family Court under Sections 7 and 8 of the Family Courts Act, 1984.

She also claimed that the property was her “shared household” under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act.

However, the High Court rejected this argument and relied upon the earlier Division Bench judgment in Geeta Anand v. Tanya Arjun. The Court clarified that the real test is whether the dispute directly arises from the marital relationship itself.

Read Also: Why India Needs Gender-Neutral Domestic Violence Laws? The Legal Gap Nobody Wants To Discuss

“The right of respondent №1 (mother-in-law) to seek mandatory and permanent injunction cannot be stated to be ‘circumstances arising out of a marital relationship’… It is, in fact, her proprietary rights over the subject property,” the Court observed.

The Court further clarified that the mother-in-law was asserting her ownership rights and not seeking relief because of matrimonial discord.

“Her right to seek such reliefs, as noted hereinbefore, arises out of her claim of ownership over the subject property, and exists independent of ‘circumstances arising out of a marital relationship’,” it observed.

Read Also: Real Court Judgments Where Men Were Falsely Accused In India

The High Court finally upheld the trial court’s order dismissing the daughter-in-law’s application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and refused to transfer the case to the Family Court.

The judgment is likely to become important in several ongoing disputes where elderly parents and in-laws claim that self-acquired properties are being dragged into prolonged matrimonial litigation despite ownership documents being in their favour.

Read Also: Why I Believe 498A IPC / Section 85 BNS Needs Structural Reform To Prevent Misuse

The ruling also reinforces that merely using terms like “shared household” cannot automatically convert every ownership dispute into a family court matter when independent proprietary rights are involved.

Explanatory Table Of Laws & Sections Mentioned In The Case

Case Details

Key Takeaways

Delhi High Court clearly held that self-acquired property disputes between in-laws and daughter-in-law are not automatically matrimonial disputes.

The Court clarified that ownership rights exist independently from marriage and must be decided by ordinary civil courts.

Simply calling a house a “shared household” does not automatically block the true owner from seeking legal remedies.

The judgment protects elderly parents and families from being forced into prolonged Family Court litigation over properties legally owned by them.

The Court stressed that the real test is the “cause of action” — if the dispute is about ownership and possession, civil courts will continue to have jurisdiction.

Click Here to Download Judgment — A J @ L v. K S & Anr. 2026_DHC_ 4527

This Could Change Your Case-Get FREE Legal Advice-Click Here!

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the Indian courts and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of “ShoneeKapoor.com” or its affiliates. This article is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content provided is not legal advice, and viewers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel. Viewer discretion is advised.

Protect your rights with informed legal strategy and dedicated support in sensitive family and custody disputes. For expert guidance and strong representation, get in touch today.

Visit: ShoneeKapoor.com

Contact No.: [phone]

Email ID: [email protected]

[businessmarketerbm]

[phone]

Today, we honor the chief architect of the Indian Constitution, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, on his birth anniversary. 🇮🇳

He was a visionary leader, a social reformer, and a guiding light who dedicated his life to justice, equality, and the empowerment of every citizen. His legacy continues to inspire us to shape minds and strengthen dreams through education and perseverance. ✨

Let us pay tribute to the man who laid the foundation of a modern, inclusive India. Happy Ambedkar Jayanti! 🙏

🌐 www.businessmarketer.in

[swarnprasthapublicschool]

🇮🇳 𝐓𝐫𝐢𝐛𝐮𝐭𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐁. 𝐑. 𝐀𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐝𝐤𝐚𝐫 𝐨𝐧 𝐀𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐝𝐤𝐚𝐫 𝐉𝐚𝐲𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐢

Remembering the visionary who gave us a Constitution that unites the nation and empowers every citizen. His legacy continues to inspire equality, knowledge, and progress.

[phone] | www.swarnprastha.com

[graminbatmya]

आदिवासींचे संविधान, पाचवी अनुसूची काय आहे? अनुसूचित क्षेत्रे, आदिवासी हक्क आणि संपूर्ण माहिती

What is the Fifth Schedule? नमस्कार मित्रांनो! मी एक सामान्य नागरिक आहे, ज्याला संविधान समजून घेण्यात खूप रस आहे. तुम्ही शाळेत किंवा महाविद्यालयात “पाचव्या अनुसूची”बद्दल ऐकले असेल. पण ती नेमकी काय आहे? ती इतकी महत्त्वाची का आहे? आणि तिचा तुमच्या जीवनाशी काय संबंध आहे? याचा मुख्य उद्देश “पाणी, जंगल आणि जमीन” यांचे संरक्षण करणे हा आहे. अनेकजण याला “आदिवासींचे संविधान” म्हणतात! पाचवी अनुसूची म्हणजे…

आदिवासींचे संविधान, पाचवी अनुसूची काय आहे? अनुसूचित क्षेत्रे, आदिवासी हक्क आणि संपूर्ण माहिती