Internal Working Model - The Continuity Hypothesis
Support For Bowlby's InternalWorking Model
Black and Schutte carried out an investigation in 2006 including 205 young adults.
They composed an adult attachment interview in which they measured the feelings about current and previous adult relationships.
They presented the participants with a list of adjectives that described childhood relationships with both parents.
They asked participants for a description of childhood events, such as birthdays and christmas, that illustrated relationships with parents.
This produced rich, qualitative data.
They found a link between the types of childhood and adult relationships.
Those who recalled positive and loving relationships with their mothers were more trusting and more likely to open up to their partners and seek comfort from them.
The who recalled positive relationships with their fathers were more likely to rely on their partners.
There were issues with the validity of information.
Evidence Against The Internal Working Model
Zimmerman carried out a longitudinal study of 44 children.
The attachment type of each child was initially assessed between 12-18 months of age to see how they responded to separation and strangers.
They were reassessed at 16 years old using interviews focusing on relationships with parents.
Zimmerman recorded life events such as parental divorce and deaths within the children's families as they were growing up.
Zimmerman found that childhood attachment type was not a good predictor of attachments in adolescence.
The impact of serious life events, such as parental divorce, was more important.
The study suggests that continuity may only apply when serious life events do not have an impact on the child.
Zimmerman found issues in the fact that the signs of attachment may not always be trustworthy.