about cordiallyhqs
back in april, some scorned member was making the rounds, trying to get people to rilled up against cordiallyhqs. from the screenshots that was shared at the time by sarah @pridefullthorpe, almost everyone agreed that there was nothing there, except an angry member who had been combative in their talks with the admin and members. and while it seemed to have faded into oblivion, sarah didn't let it go.
since april i've received many anons about the group and i simply wasn't online to see them. a current member of the group has also been dming me with what they claimed is proofs of the admin's bad behavior.
one of these is the claim that the group ai. i cannot stress enough how dangerous ai is and how we should avoid it when we can, meaning for non-essentials things. the group has use ai to generate manips of ships and some members have admitted to use it to help with phrasing or general knowledge of the time period. there was a very heated discussion about it in the cordiallyhqs group chat that i have been sent by a member. i have talked with the admin about this and did told her that it seemed like some feelings were not as validated as others but that is something that happens in large group. the admin did give out many tools to help with wordings and knowledge of the time period and said more than once that if someone has low muse, to ask for an hiatus instead of using ai or other writing tools. so to say that the group encourage the use of ai for writing is false and twisting the admin's words.
sarah also claimed that the admin was in the group under another name and their proofs was that the member in question was in the same group 4 years ago. the group in question is one i do remember as having some popularity back then. it means nothing that 2 people were in the same group in the past. but it seems interesting that the person sarah suspects to be the admin another name is someone that has problems with sarah to begin with.
i think it's also very telling of the admin's character that she never once asked me who the person i was talking to were. the admin knew right from the start of our conversation that i had been sent things and never did she asked to see any of them or asked any information about them. the admin was not engaging in some witch hunt in her own group despite knowing that there was some people engaging in that kind of behaviour. i do believe that one member was within the group only to gather dirt on the admin, they have voiced many times how they dislike the way things are handled and how wrong they think the admin is being while siding with sarah.
the other rpt/rph getting anons that are accusing the admin of things, know they are coming from either sarah or lorna. i have seen the screenshots they claim show the admin divising members and favoring some and none of it is true. the only thing i see are two people being combative and not fitting in with the group, by their own faults.
that video/screenshot going around that supposedly shows the admin telling a member that they won't change a fc because the other person is their friend is also fake. i have seen a lot of screenshots of danii having conversations with others, often conversations that were very accusatory toward the admin and i can confidently say that she doesn't write or speak like that at all. the group has been made aware of the problematic fcs and asked members to change them.
let me make this very clear, sarah and lorna have both been engaging in a bullying and harassment campaign for months. members of the group have been receiving hateful anons, even on their personal blogs. everything in the tags is coming from them.