
seen from United Kingdom
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from United States
What if students had some input into how schools are run?
This idea scares the crap out of so many adults. Just like the proposal to lower the voting age in Oregon to 16. State Rep Fahey chortled at the idea during a town hall meeting a couple years ago. (I think chortle is the right word, not quite a scoff, but not any kind of sound of appreciation either.)
Today my 15-year-old asked me if kids in high school can vote in the school board election [she has been keeping as much of a distance as possible from this whole project as possible!]. “Yes, of course,” I replied. “As long as they are 18 and registered to vote.” I told her about my idea to have the board representatives from each high school have a vote.
After a few minutes of pondering she had her own proposal: “I think all kids in high school should be able to vote. It’s not like voting for president - the schools are for students, and the decisions made impact the students.”
“Let’s put together a subcommittee to study the impacts of that,” I said.
Bahahaha! Not really. I would never say that. I hope I never say that.
A Very INformative Forum at Camas Ridge - don’t let status quo continue to reign at 4j!
It has been pointed out to me that it is not responsible to drop “local politicos don’t know formative assessment from a hole in the ground” without any context. It’s not professional, not polite, etc. So here it is:
Last week, while sitting around a first grade-size table in grown-up sized chairs, feeling cute, in a simply wonderful classroom at a local elementary school, there was a question from the audience (paraphrasing): “Children are spending 15 days a year doing testing. How many days do you think are appropriate?”
The moderator, the always lovely and diplomatic Maya Rabasa, said, (paraphrasing again): “I think the purpose of the question is not to argue over the accuracy of the number 15, but to hear from the candidates your ideas about what is and isn’t appropriate in terms of student assessment.”
Each candidate had one minute to respond. I went first, so I held on to the FM unit mike for a few seconds thinking about how much I really do think is ok. “Two days,” I said. “Every three years. Maximum.”
I am sorry to say I don’t remember Martina’s response because I was not able to “stay in the moment” because I was having a little internal panic / impostor syndrome attack. (Like, “Wow that was so decisive, do I have the authority to say that? Can I just make something like that up? How come no one is asking me to cite my source?”) But then it occurred to me: I know my stuff. I can absolutely speak with authority about these things. Not gonna say that that’s the last word and if elected that would be the first thing I would implement without any input from anyone, but ... yeah. I am an expert on this.
Phew. OK, so I came back in time to hear Jim Torrey going on for his one minute trying to sound like some kind of anti-testing radical! He’s never been a fan he says of Smarter Balanced (who knew?!) and would like to limit the amount of testing (whaaaaa?). But my favorite part was him talking about how he would like to see us move away from summative testing to more “informative” testing. Because the summative testing doesn’t tell the teacher what’s going on until the following fall when it’s too late (sort of true) and the “informative” testing INFORMS the teacher about what the student knows and doesn’t know etc. Mary Walston followed suit with her non-answer about how testing should be limited but some standardized tests are necessary and (my favorite) “Anyway, it’s the law, it’s not like we can just ‘opt out’ of it. ...although parents can opt out for their own kids.”
This was an important moment for me in this campaign. These people not only do not know about the issues surrounding testing, they have never, NOT ONCE asked us (the expert team at CAPE) for more information about it. We have appeared before them countless times over the last several years, as supplicants to the pantheon of emotionless board members, using our 3 minutes to BEG them to take some kind of stand (a stand for our children one might say) against this regime of educational violence against our students. They have ignored us and dismissed us over and over again.
So, yeah, I am the expert on this one, and yes, I do want to get on this board because, YES! It only makes sense that a SCHOOL board should have AT LEAST one teacher/educator on it.
If your plan is for one year plant rice. If your plan is for ten years plant trees. If your plan is for one hundred years educate children.
Confucius
The high school paper asked “why should high school 18-year-olds vote for you? (Love their style, so direct!) And why indeed? they’re out! So I broke out this quote and told them the school board election that happens in your senior year isn’t really about you, it’s not about me. It’s about the future. And this particular election is about a future free of this status quo that we’re mired in!
When someone asks you if you support legislation & policy to reduce class size....